I know a scan at 6wks was a lifeline to me.
I know that the thread has moved on from the title - but it needs reiterating that there are sometimes really good reasons for offering early scans.
My first pregnancy failed at 10wks. Bleeding - A&E - test - positive - probably OK - come back in the morning - scan - ERPC. 3 months of backwards and forwards with the Drs because of intermitent heavy bleeding, eventually got examined, sent for scan, admitted, another ERPC. 2 wks later rescaned, carted off to another hospital to start chemo. Ban on TTC for a year, monitored for the rest of my life.
When, much to everyone's surprise, particularly the consultant with whom we had the appointment arranged for me to get the actual date that month to start IVF, I got pregnant naturally, of course the worry was that the MP would come back again. I think the chances dropped from 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100 - and if I'd managed to be 1 in 20,000 its very easy to see how you got to 1 in 100. So, I was scanned at 6wks.
No finger nails left by then. To see that little blip of a heartbeat on the monitor was wonderful. And I was rescanned at 9wks for peace of mind. OK, it left me with 3 weeks of terror - and indeed, every wait between appointments left me thinking 'what if'....
For me, blood tests are very unreliable. My last 2 MC have been monitored quite carefully in terms of follow up - my blood tests can take 3mo to get nearly back to normal.
Nancy I think that you've hit a very raw nerve with lots of people - I know that you've changed your mind as a result of the thread, at least to some extent.