Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

£35k tax free for working 20 hours a week....

775 replies

BitchyWitchy · 22/10/2010 23:42

In response to the 'Benefits' thread, I thought I would post this...

We took the decision to reduce DHs hours a few months back as we realised we are better off with him working part time than full time and this is what we get WEEKLY (4 DCs):

Wages (20 hours per week) £209
Housing Benefit £188 (leaving £7 for us to pay)
Council tax benefit £19 (leaving £3 for us to pay
Tax Credits £196
Working tax credits £13
Child benefit £60.50

Thats over £35K tax free! DH's fulltime wage was £34k before tax.

Also get free prescriptions and dental care, discounted kids activities and leisure centre membership. DH is home 5 days a week and I am loving having him around to help out with the DCs and doing stuff with them which he could not do when he worked 50 hours a week! 3 DC are at school so we get quality time with the youngest.

We are also doing free OU degree courses so we can get better paid jobs in a few years.

Wish to bloody god we did this earlier when we were BOTH stressed out working fulltime and brought in LESS that what we get now after childcare.

We shall enjoy this until 2013 I can tell you! I don't give a monkey's what anyone thinks of us. DH is still working after all and who would really continue working fulltime knowing they get all this? It may not be right but while it's on offer, should we refuse it?

OP posts:
MassiveKnob · 26/10/2010 13:28

Seems so, bodycolder

Tootles - Thank you Smile

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:29

We pay 40% tax on our income and I would love to think that in this climet should our lives become difficult, there will be some sort of help out there for me as well sicne I HAVE BEEN PAYING TAXES.

MassiveKnob · 26/10/2010 13:32
  1. "For a short time". 3 years and 72 grand? That is just one family.
  1. "I don't call this benefit cheat or immorality" - I do. Deliberately giving up half your job to claim off the state because you feel like it. IMMORAL and CHEATING.

And you have not discussed WHERE this money is coming from, because, although you called me THICK, I feel YOU are the densest person on the planet at the moment.

MassiveKnob · 26/10/2010 13:35

I would also be interesting to know the Bullshit the OP's dh has given to the benefit people about how he has given up half of his income??????????????????????

I do hope he told the truth, although somehow I suspect not Hmm

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:38

Please payt attention and read the OP post where it's said "few months back we too the decision to reduce DH hours".

MassiveKnob get off this thread if you want to have a fight or go and take on other people.

FOR FUCK SAKE READ THE ORIGINAL THREAD AND THINK THICKO!!"!

bodycolder · 26/10/2010 13:38

In 1999/2000 my dp had to give up work to look after ds and I as I was on dialysis and life became unmanageable for us.When we approached SS they gave us virtually 0 as he had left his job voluntarily and the lady we met with suggested we could sell our house which had some equity and so we did!

Tootlesmummy · 26/10/2010 13:38

Again, the whole point is their lives did not become difficult, they couldn't be bothered to work and thought they would take the easy route.

If everyone thinks like this then the country is in even more trouble than it is just now, the country does not have the money to pay this out to people who can't be bothered to work!

Unbelieveable.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 13:39

That seems odd wayoftheworld, I know lots of people who either do not claim or do not keep their child benefit. I thought the current thinking was the people should not claim money they do not need.

bodycolder · 26/10/2010 13:40

I think this is cheating the system though as the Ops dh had a full time reasonably paid job and gave that up to live off the state he didn't lose his job/redy=undancy/ill health etc but CHOSE the easy way out.The welfare system is not for picking and choosing a lifestyle it is for people in serious need who have no other choice

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:41

bodycolder it is not just you that has had that experience. Unfortunalty there is money to be claimed if you need help, but as the benefit system is soo complicated no body seems to know where to go for help.

In so many situations I have heard stories of people saying "only if I knew this at the time, we would not have struggled as much" and that is the reason why this conversation should happen here on MN to bring in shared info.

MaMoTTaT · 26/10/2010 13:42

True with the HB and CTB - although a LOT of people on "full benefits" (ie not working at all) have t top up their housing benefit out of their other benefits.

I used to have to top up £60 a month, but I got lucky with this house and found a LL that would accept housing benefit who also had a rent that was at the LHA threshold.

The "better off" calculations that they do when ou're on benefits always mildly amuse me.

They show you that you'd get X amount of wokring tax credit, plus your salary, plus 80% (soon to be 70%) of your childcare paid for.

But fail to point out that you'll lose your free school meals (I know I really feel it when it's school holidays and have to feed them lunch as well as breakfast and dinner - so obviously would be the same if you're making/paying for their lunches at school), you'll lose some of your housing benefit, you have to top up the childcare costs, you have to get to work.

They say "oh look you'll be £100 a week better off working X hours a week"

But the reality is that the working poor aren't £100 a week "better off" than when they were on benefits as they fail to factor in the extra costs.

I know I'll be in roughly the same financial position as I am now when I start working, not that it's going to stop me finding work, but I can imagine for some who don't understand the self esttem/bettering yourself that comes from working, the added stress of working just doesn't seem worthwhile.

The system is all f*cked up (and I say that as someone "in" the system right now).

They kick you back out to work, and then leave you to it. There's no sliding scale. There's no way of taking that 12hr a week job to get your foot back on the ladder and improve future job propsects, you're dropped in the poo while they reassess your tax credits, your housing benefit, etc.

I'll confess I'm terrified about how I'll cope financially in the "gap" between ringing up to cancel current claims and the news ones sorted out - I've even gone to the extent of getting a credit card (tucked safely away so I don't get tempted to use it for other stuff) to make sure I've got something to tide me over.

I'm worried about childcare, and at the age of just turned 10 am already preparing DS1 to be spending potentially whole days at home in the school holidays (though he'l be 11 when it happens - forward planning and all that).

It's scary looking at jobs that come up that only pay £8-10k and wondering what will happen if they squeeze the benefit cuts even more so that the Caps and things apply to those getting WTC as well as those not working.

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:42

bodycolder would anyone had given them a medal for not choosing the easy way out?

vespasian · 26/10/2010 13:44

I have never chosen the easy way out and have always tried to make myself and my family as a low a burden on society as possible. No medal but a great deal of self respect.

MassiveKnob · 26/10/2010 13:44

way - I am entitled to stay on this thread thank you.

I have read the OP. Thank you.

I am asking if it is perfectly above board for me to pick up the phone, call the benefit people today, and explain that dh would like to have more time at home and claim benefits instead of working full time. I would explain that I have been working weelly weelly hard for a while and could do with a break. Would it be ok for them to pay me for 3 years? And you are saying, they will immediately say "yes Mrs MK, give us details of your bank account and we shall start funding you"

You talk shit. They have lied their way into this situation and nearly everyone but you can see it.

violethill · 26/10/2010 13:47

Agree with massiveknob (love the name btw, and am intelligent enough to do irony unlike some posters!!)

This really boils down to a very simple story. The welfare system was set up to support people in times of genuine need. Not as a system that could be manipulated so that people take what they want from it to support their lifestyle choices. Unfortunately it's been so badly managed that it became precisely that. It's now having to be rationalised and cut massively because it's unaffordable.

Of course the op is being massively unreasonable. However, the one sure thing is that she won't be able to continue this. I also think anyone who really believes it's a sensible decision to stop working or reduce hours just because you can play the system is being incredibly naive. Benefits simply pay for your current expenses. Clearly they sometimes pay far too much, and are a disincentive to working, but they don't provide any investment in the future. Think longer term- think housing, pension etc - doesn't look so clever now, boasting about living off the state.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 13:47

People should end up on benefits it should not be a choice. I have taken state benefits before because despite my very best efforts I had no other choice. I immediately set about trying to get off benefits and feel I have now taken from society so I need to focus on putting back into the pot.

I am shocked that others do not have this attitude.

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:48

Thank you MaMoTatt for making it clear the truth about BS.

Get out of the BS is a nightmare: it takes time for claims to be processed and stopped. And if by the time they have stopped your financial situation changes again, trying to get back into it will be another nightmare all together.

scaryteacher · 26/10/2010 13:51

Vespasian - why not Titus or Domitian?

MaMoTTaT · 26/10/2010 13:55

Ending up in the BS is horrid, trying to get out of it can be hell.

I just can't get my head around someone that chooses to end up in the system (even if the "working" part of the system) without good reason.

wayoftheworld · 26/10/2010 13:55

vespasian you have this attitude bacause you have been told that claiming benefit carries some kind of stigma with it, it is only for the vulnerables- but what this means is rather unclear. This is the reason why the system is in such a mess. There are a lot of assumptions being made.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 13:57

You through me then scary. I picked the name from a book I was reading. My dd was doing a project about the Romans in Wiltshire.

MassiveKnob · 26/10/2010 13:59

way - waiting for you to tell me that ringing the benefit folk, and telling them we fancy dropping our hours and claiming instead is perfectly legal and moral.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 13:59

No waysoftheworld you are making assumptions about me. I do think that benefits are for the vulnerable but do not think they carry a stigma. But if we all take out of the sytsem because we feel like it or cannot be bothered working the people who really need it get less.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 14:01

Benefits are like an insurance policy, we all pay in and if the worst happens we make a claim. If I set fire to my house in order to make an insurance claim it would be fraud. The OP is essentially doing the same.

vespasian · 26/10/2010 14:01

threw me not through me. If scary travelled through me that would be scary.