dolphin, that's your opinion, that it was nasty. You can think that, your choice, but you cannot dispute that it is fact.
I am not comparing myself to anyone, and even if I were, I most certainly not do what you tell me. You are failing to grasp the relevance, that drinking in charge of children can, and does, put them in immediate danger. I am pointing out that it is socially unacceptable to point this out, not saying that kids being around constant smoke is good. Far from it.
Perhaps it hits a nerve?
hollyweens, I think smokers are merely trying to reassure the op that she is not an unfit mother for having a fag in the garden. Smokers are well aware of the health implications of smoking, something the non smokers must forget, otherwise they wouldn't repeat themselves verbatim, stale smell, early death etc. Packets of cigarettes have gross images on them, they have not made a jot of difference. Smokers know all the facts, to reitterate it is pointless.
I can imagine a trip round a cystic fibrosis word is harrowing, but I can equally imagine so is the liver transplant unit. It won't make a difference to me or many smokers, or drinkers, because it's all relative. People take their chances. That's their choice.
My father is 70, he will never quit, he said he doesn't want another 10 or 15 years being alive but miserable without his fags. I can see what he means, he started smoking a long time ago, when doctors adveritised the bloody things in posters and at the cinema!
It's just pointless going over old ground, there is nothing new under the sun, some folk want to smoke and take the consequences, some want to drink, or be grossly obese, or take drugs. Dislike it all you like, but it's not illegal and the op is not an unfit mother.
Oh and judge away, we wouldn't expect anything less 