Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the public don't give a rat's arse about the colour of my hair....

65 replies

PinkieMinx · 03/10/2010 23:14

Have been forced encouraged to take leave until my hair colour grows out as work have introduced new rules which include a hair rule - they do not allow 'unnatural' hair colours (eg. green, blue, pink, pillar box red, magenta... you get the idea).

AIBU to think the general public would not care about my hair colour?

OP posts:
OldLadyKnowsNothing · 03/10/2010 23:45

Well, we have said, "It depends on your job". Obviously yours is one of "those" jobs. I'm sorry I feel the way I do; I'd probably get over it once you proved your competence, but to me, "wild hair" says "young, rebellious and irresponsible", not "reliable professional." :(

Sorry.

OldLadyKnowsNothing · 03/10/2010 23:46

But then a lot would depend on the style, too...

[thoughtful]

LittleMissHissyFit · 03/10/2010 23:54

how long have you held this job, and how often do you change your hair colour? To get back to work, could you not dye your hair a more natural colour?

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 08:35

I stand corrected - I really didn't think anyone would care nowadays. Am surprised though & a bit Confused

About 7 years and I change my hair at least once a year. Haven't had 'natural' hair for about 20 years. Am off job hunting Sad

OP posts:
deaddei · 04/10/2010 08:37

I know a head teacher with purple hair and a really funky cut.
She's great.

marenmj · 04/10/2010 09:20

I have violet hair and a very traditional cut (longish, curly, mostly worn braided or in buns).

It's the one bit a freedom I have being a SAHM.

I'm not looking forward to when I will have to let it go when re-entering the workforce (because inevitably I will - I most definitely will be in one of "those" jobs. I'll be lucky if they let me wear trousers!)

I don't bleach first so it's not 'vibrant' just a slight tint, but I'm sure it will be enough to get someone's dander up.

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 09:38

See that galls me - freedom of being a SAHM - I think hair colour is a personal choice, wearing uniform is not. I hate I cannot be myself out of work due to policies at work. Why can I not just wear a head scarf!? Ridiculous

OP posts:
Chil1234 · 04/10/2010 09:44

Hair colour, piercings, lavish tattoos, clothing.... I don't think it's unreasonable of an employer, trying to make a particular statement and project a particular corporate image, to insist that you look how they want you to look when they're paying for your time. There are jobs where appearance is irrelevant - yours clearly isn't one of them. Work for yourself or in a more creative role and you could decorate yourself exactly how you like.

marenmj · 04/10/2010 09:51

TBH, I really can't get angry about being required to have a 'natural' haircolour for me - since I know about it and am welcome to choose a different profession (and I will be doing as much as I can within the profession to allow the most flexibility I can).

I can see why you're frustrated about the change in rules, but I don't know if you will have a real leg to stand on wrt complaining about it unless you have been singled out and others are allowed to flout these rules but you are not iyswim.

We all temper ourselves in all sorts of ways in an office setting. Those who don't are usually seen as being unable to cope within a work environment (and are usually doing all sorts of inappropriate things - not that you are - just thinking of for instance, the person who just can't see that emailing bestiality jokes is probably not appropriate at work).

Sure it sucks, but until you (or I) am the Boss, employees have to suck it up and deal with the rules the employers wants to make. It doesn't matter how illogical they are.

ratspeaker · 04/10/2010 10:06

Did your employers state at interview that there was a dress code or state it in their contract?
If it's a new condition they are being unreasonable by changing the terms and conditions without due consultation.
Do you have a union rep that may be able to look into it?

I am totally biased on this.
I find bleached blondes with orange makeup highly off putting

LtEveDallas · 04/10/2010 10:24

I'm afraid that I wouldn't take a person in authority seriously with outlandish hair.

I am in the same boat - whilst I am still within my contract I follow the rule that "Hair, if not natural, should be unobtrusive"

I would be very careful with 'making a stand' in this way - you may not be happy to work if you cannot dye your hair, but with the job market the way it is I'm sure there will be hundreds of people that will.... is it really worth it?

I agree (word for word) with OldLadyKnowsNothing post of 23:25, sorry!

Scuttlebutter · 04/10/2010 10:39

Although I'm broadly sympathetic, I think it does depend on what job you do. There are many, many jobs with tight and restrictive uniform/appearance rules for a variety of reasons, some seemingly reasonable, others less so. As others have said, if your appearance is that much at odds with the corporate "culture" you work in, then I think you are almost certainly in the wrong job. There are plenty of workplaces where an unusual appearance may be perfectly acceptable, even welcome - the fashion and creative industries spring to mind.

Is this really an issue for trade unions? Surely there are more important workplace concerns?

I don't think I'd have wanted the news about my cancer to be given to me by someone with violet hair, no matter how clean or neat. For that type of job, it shouldn't be about you - it should be about being sober and professional, and in fact probably quite dull and forgettable. Bluntly in those circumstances, violet hair just gets in the way and can (hopefully not in your case) make you look like an attention seeking teenager, rather than a serious and committed worker.

It's naive to think your hair is not sending out messages - our clothing and hair carry all sorts of messages about our gender, our sexuality, our status and our power - there are whole rafts of studies on this, and every culture will have status/gender signifiers of varying types.

I actually think the idea of a headscarf is a good one - these days, most of us are increasingly seeing these being worn in a variety of settings, not just for religious reasons but also for those going through chemo - strikes me as being a sensible way forward.

PURPLESWAN · 04/10/2010 10:49

I guess there are certain jobs where you need to be taken seriously and, unfortnately, some people are just too dumb to see through what is in the surface and just listen to what you say and how you do your job.

If I were ill and my consultant had really nice violet hair which suited her I wouldnt worry - if it were one of those skanky bad condition home jobs then perhaps I would think Hmm

Ive known people with bright red hair and purple hair and have just though "oh that really suits you"

Chandon · 04/10/2010 11:42

I would not care, as a member of the public.

Neither do I care about piercings in the face etc.

But I guess in some jobs it might "distract" from your official role?????

mayorquimby · 04/10/2010 11:45

Would echoe others. It would depend on your job and the style of hair.

pressyourthumbs · 04/10/2010 12:26

I don't care whatsoever what colour people's hair is. I wouldn't think that a midwife with a lip piercing or a lawyer with a tattoo would necessarily do a worse job than one who looked just like me. What people choose to do with their own bodies doesn't reflect, to me, how professional they are.

talkingnonsense · 04/10/2010 12:54

Can you not wear a scarf or wide hairband? Or gel it back so it all looks wet/dark iyswim. Then at least you can have it how you like it at home (btw would not bother me how anyone did their hair in any job, as long as not getting in my food!).

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 16:15

No wig, hairband or scarf allowed.
I have done the same job for several years with various hair colours and it's never appeared to be an issue.
A uniform was introduced about 2 years ago and the stricter appearance rules more recently.

There's 2 comments now about being a teenager - am genuinely surprised by these opinions. No I don't think I'm young or 'crazeee' - just fancied a change, hairdresser suggested it (as she thought it would really suit me - which people say it does (to my face anyway Wink)) I thought that sounds lovely - no ulterior motive to look 'zany' or unprofessional.

OP posts:
BigOfNoorks · 04/10/2010 16:41

I would not judge you on your hair colour. I die mine frequently and as long as it was pinned up or tied back (in a profession where this is sensible) it would not bother me.

If however you were a chef and had bum length blue hair and were wearing it down I would have a problem and that would have nothing to do with the colour.

FindingMyMojo · 04/10/2010 17:03

Personally I don't care about your hair colour - it wouldn't make a difference to me at all.

However if you are dealing with the 'public' I'm afraid a lot of people will judge you, think less of you, not take you seriously, be cautious or even frightened of you etc etc because you will look 'different'.

Gosh I'm just thinking of the different ways my friend was treated with a really cool sharp spiky multi coloured (very expensive) cut, to when she had long dark brown hair. Or the difference in the way I've been treated with spiky red/auburn hair compared with long blonde hair - it's ridiculous. Hostile glares & being ignored & not acknowledged vs 'hello love what can I do for you'. You'd think times would have moved on but I doubt they have really.

Good luck with getting your way with this, but some people will treat you funny - because sadly some people are funny like that.

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 18:34

Thanks.
Def won't be changing thier minds on this one - hence being off until it grows out. Dislike feeling I am being judged on my appearance not the great job I do.
I do find it a bit sad that some members of the public would feel it is unreasonable to have unusual hair in a serious environment though. I just don't get it - but I'm me, they're them, we're all different (which is kind of my point!)

OP posts:
rapidsjohnson · 04/10/2010 18:42

I find the concept of 'natural' here really interesting.
I personally find it completely unnatural-looking when someone who is clearly quite old has raven-black or auburn or blonde hair without a streak of grey and it is obviously, obviously dyed and just looks wrong. And yet that is acceptable, presumably at least partly because it is about increasing your sexual attractiveness. In some ways I would find pink or green hair less weird-looking because it's so obviously not genuine and not trying to be; I can't help suspecting that the fact that dyeing your hair pink is about something other than making yourself look sexually attractive is part of the reason why it is so often not considered acceptable at work.

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 18:51

That's a really interesting point. Maybe they think I have an 'I don't care' attitude.

OP posts:
nagoo · 04/10/2010 19:09

I can't see how they could ban you from wearing a 'natural' wig, altough they do cost a fair whack. Who would dare to ask you? They wouldn't ban someone if they had alopecia would they?

I completely empathise about the not being allowed to be yourself thing. I tried to 'conform' after I got promoted at work to help myself up a bit, but it really depressed me 'looking like nothing'.

I find that I can get away with plum-y and bright red better than other colours, as they are getting a bit mainstream now.

PinkieMinx · 04/10/2010 19:26

You can wear a wig for medical reasons - so alopecia is a valid reason. Think they'd notice if i turned up in one TBH.

No bright red allowed, only natural reds.

I do find it utterly depressing - have been very low about it all.

OP posts: