It was suggested that I post it here by another member to draw attention to it, so no, I didn't ask if it was reasonable.
You obviously do not have to join the Facebook group if you do not want to! Freedom of choice and all that.
It does amaze me that people aren't more angry about things like this. Women have fought so hard to have our status raised in the home and the workplace and a restaurant which reduces women to nothing more than a pair of breasts isn't going to help the cause. Freedom of choice or not, as I said earlier, I believe that the rights of a few do not take precedence over the rights of 50% of the population to be seen as something more than a set of body parts.
I honestly believe that if it was the other way around, i.e. it was men in this position, applications like this wouldn't see the light of day. At a council meeting at which I spoke a few weeks ago, a male objector stood up and talked about a new restaurant he was opening where only men whose balls were big enough could get a job. He was asked to keep it decent by the mayor yet we were referring to 'Hooters' and 'breasts' in the context of women being employed for the size of their breasts all the way through our speeches and no one found that offensive or derogatory.
However, I will retreat from this thread as I can see that this is an unpopular topic here!