I have a friend who has 2 daughters. Her eldest has attended the local comprehensive and left with only 1 GCSE. The school is in a nice area but is back on special measures for the second time in recent years.
Friends second daughter has just started year 7 there. Friend has never read an ofsted report or read the GCSE results for the school.
My son goes to a school a few miles away which gets really good results. He is in year 8 and is mainly in top sets and I am really happy with the school and it's policies etc. DS is a quiet boy in school and doesn't have loads of friends - just a select few (mostly from primary school who have gone to same school) and is generally happy enough. He was like that at primary school too.
I am so used to listening to my friend telling me that such and such didn't send their kid to the local school and how that kid hasn't made any friends (they've only been there a week) and how she doesn't understand why people don't send their kids to the local school where all their friends are going. (most kids didn't go to the local school this year anyway!). How people think they're better than everyone else by sending their child elsewhere.
Whilst I agree that it's nice to send your child to a school where their primary friends are, it really isn't the be all and end all and isn't getting a good education something to be considered quite seriously too? I would have loved to have sent my son to the local school but I wanted him to have the best chance of an education. Am I being unreasonable?