There's an upcoming work trip to South Africa. We have a small team, most of whom are going. I said I was willing to go if needed. Tbh, I didn't want to, because I have DD(2) and would rather not be away for her for 2 weeks. It would be a sacrifice for me. I never once said that or mentioned in any way that it would be awkward.
My boss decided to make alternative arrangements for someone else to go. I'm happy with that. However, he also reprimanded me for my lack of enthusiasm about the trip. Apparently I should look on it as a great perk of the job.
Is this fair? He's reproaching me not for something I did or failed to do, but about how I felt. Something he perceives as a perk does not feel like that to me, but somehow my feelings are "wrong".
I haven't been penalized in any formal way, and I'm not about to rush off to an employment tribunal. I just hate that my boss (usually a decent person) thinks less of me because of this.
So I'm not AIBU by stealth, some factors that may be relevant: boss doesn't have dcs, and neither does anyone else in the office, although his wife is pregnant. I could leave my DD with my exH, but I'm reluctant to do so (I have some concerns about his parenting but he has a lot of access to her due to a court order). The trip is not related to my main work duties.
My home life shouldn't interfere with my work, I fully appreciate that. I didn't ask for any special accommodation to be made for me, and it is helpful that my boss did it anyway. I should be grateful, I suppose, but damnit, I'm annoyed to be accused of having an attitude problem when I was willing to conscientiously do something that was difficult for me. So AIBU?