Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be fuming that Tesco have put a potentially LETHAL toy back on sale!!!

35 replies

AddictedToRadley · 04/09/2010 21:07

I bought a teddy from Tesco on 10th August that was labelled as suitable from age 12 months+ for my ds aged 21 months. I gave it to him the next day and (as per usual) he put it in his mouth. I was just about to go cook his dinner but thankfully waited 5 minutes longer than normal. My ds suddenly started choking, if I'd been in the kitchen I may not have heard him as he wasn't coughing loud or anything he just couldn't breathe and his lips were going a blueish colour. I put my finger at the back of his mouth and pulled a good sized clump of fur out. Thankfully he was fine almost straight away but was very distressed. The fur had come from his new toy!! I'd bought one for a friends baby too so I checked that one and found chunks of fur came away if I just pulled at it slightly.

Obviously I was horrified at what couldve been so rang Tesco customer services. I was told that I had to take the toy back to the store for a refund. I told them I was not bothered about a refund more about the safety of other small children. These teddies were of animals. Like lions, cheetahs, monkeys, zebras etc and only cost £1 for the smaller ones or 2 for £3 for the slightly bigger ones. At this price I was so frightened they'd sell a lot more before I got to the store to fill in the complaint form and potentially put other children at risk. I was told they would issue a UK wide recall within 24 hours. Even though I didn't think this was fast enough what more could I do? I went to the store, filled in the complaint form (which took well over an hour!) and was told I'd hear back within a week (customer services said it would only be 3 days!). I didn't hear anything after 10 days so went back and was told it would be 2 weeks, after 2 weeks I was told it would be 3 weeks, yet I've still heard nothing!

Anyway, today I went in to Tesco and found these stuffed animals were back on sale! I was fuming and asked to speak to the duty manager. He said it was Tesco's policy to look into the complaint BEFORE removing any toy. I asked why and was told 'they may loose sales'!! I would've thought/hoped that a child's safety should come before profits but obviously not.

AIBU to have insisted that these soft toys were removed from sale immediately? It's only the one store out of all the stores they have but I'm so worried a child could die. If I hadn't been in the room when this happened who knows what the outcome would have been.

What more can I do to get the word out about this toy? I don't want a child to have to die before Tesco takes this seriously.

AIBU to be so bloody angry with Tesco? I was annoyed that they hadn't had the courtesy to even acknowledge my complaint before today, now I bloody fuming that they've put the toy back on sale (IF they even removed it from sale in the first place).

OP posts:
girlafraid · 04/09/2010 21:09

Call trading standards?

dinkystinky · 04/09/2010 21:11

Get in touch with your local paper and let them have the story - and let the customer services at Tesco know you're doing so. YANBU to be angry at Tesco - they're idiots.

FlyingInTheCLouds · 04/09/2010 21:12

they should have resolved it by now yanbu

solo · 04/09/2010 21:12

YANBU. Could you go somewhere else with your complaint? like trading standards? Hope your voice is heard in any case.

goingbacktowork · 04/09/2010 21:21

I had exactly the same experience with tesco own wooden hammer and peg set (where you bang the pegs to go through the table thing they sit in). The hammer flew off the handle when my child used it and caught her in the eye. Several lengthy complaint letters and calls later nothing was ever done. First being told there was nothing wrong with glue on the hammer, then being told there might be etc etc. Same as you I was only interested in the child safety not in getting cost (about £10) back which is I think the reason they thought I was complaining about it. They simply don't care about safety issues.

Ishouldprobablywax · 04/09/2010 21:21

I agree with dinkystinky 100 percent

AddictedToRadley · 04/09/2010 21:35

Goingbacktowork I nearly bought one of those last week. Was going to buy it soon for DSs birthday - definitely won't be now!! Thank you.

I was thinking of the papers but don't want my identity revealing (long story but involves hiding away from DHs ex- psycho wife and restraining orders etc) and don't think they'd be interested without the photo of horrified mummy and upset toddler!

Trading standards is a very good idea though will call them on Monday.

I just hope the power of MN stops others from buying this toy. I'll never trust an age label again. Even if it says from birth I'll be trying to destroy it before buying it for ds Grin

I'm so pleased you all seem to agree with me and don't think I'm being a neurotic mum!

OP posts:
tethersend · 04/09/2010 21:37

It might be worth telling them about this thread-pretty negative publicity already. I bet you find it spurs them into action quite quickly Wink

AddictedToRadley · 04/09/2010 21:46

Great idea tethersend will be doing that Monday along with trading standards!

OP posts:
gizzy1973 · 04/09/2010 21:51

are they the ones on a red clip hook?
these ones had suitable for 3+ on them in my local store

Suziewoos · 04/09/2010 22:02

Yes def contact TS. The big stores (and companies) amaze me. This is different I know but not long ago Sainsbury thought it would be a good idea to put honey on promotion in the baby isle - Brilliant ... if you are a first time mum and dont know about the possible risk of Botulism to under ones and you think great lets have a natural sweetener. Scarey, very scarey and all Sainsburys said was there is a small warning on the jar, what if its not read?!?

Profits, that is all they think about :(

Rhiannonthescribbler · 04/09/2010 22:11

This is an utter disgrace, you wouldn't need to necessarily reveal your ID for the papers would you? This needs getting out into the open beyond this thread, bloody b***ds, "lose sales" my arse, what about child safety? Angry

thederkinsdame · 04/09/2010 22:25

I work in a related trade and you should call head office. You are right in thinking they should do a product recall as there has already been a choking incident. It is likely that the fur pile is too long as for kids under 3 the fur should be really short so it can't be pulled off. I would also speak to trading standards ASAP. They are putting children's lives at risk. Did the toy have a CE mark?
Tescos should take this seriously before a kid does choke to death rather than investigating while the toy is still on sale.

AddictedToRadley · 04/09/2010 22:33

Gizzy no there was no clip on it. I went to another store and they have them too and def all say 12 months+ in fairly large print. In tiny writing inside the cardboard tag it says 'pile may be loose, brush before giving to a child'. Most people wouldn't read this as it was in teeny tiny print inside the label (folded like a greetings card iyswim).

I will try papers too then see if they can do it anonymously.

thederkinsdame I'm not allowed to speak to head office as I'm just a mere customer!! Always put me through to customer service saying it's head office but it's clearly not when they have to send the complaint to head office who are based elsewhere in the country!!!

Every little helps - yeah right!!!

OP posts:
sapphireblue · 04/09/2010 22:39

I think you need to try and take it straight to the top of tesco.........find out who the chief executive is and direct a letter of complaint to him/her.

In the meantime, definitely contact trading standards. I'm so Shock that they would continue to sell an item when they know that a baby could have died because of it.

I'm so glad your DS is ok.

gizzy1973 · 04/09/2010 22:55

different one to what we have then

hope you get somewhere with trading standards - they at least should take it seriously

lemonysweet · 04/09/2010 23:09

half of me says 'oh thats awful, call trading standards immediately'
half of me says 'its a £1 bear and they say on the label to brush it so their arses are covered'

tethersend · 04/09/2010 23:10

Arf at 'Brush it so their arses are covered' Grin

lemonysweet · 04/09/2010 23:21

oops Grin

AddictedToRadley · 05/09/2010 02:19

Am I wrong in thinking that you're not supposed to have parts that come away from a toy that's for a child under three? I wouldn't have a problem with this soft toy if it was aged 36 months+.

I do think Tesco have tried to cover their backs by putting the 'brush it' label on but then again it shouldn't really cover them otherwise toy manufacturers could put a teeny tiny warning on toys saying that small parts may become loose ie on a car the wheels could come loose. Isn't the idea of toys suitable for under 36 months that they're safe if a child puts them in their mouths? Or am I just being dense?

OP posts:
BalloonSlayer · 05/09/2010 07:45

I had a similar thing a few years back. A newborn cot toy DD had been given as a gift came apart at the seam and loads of stuffing had sprung out. She never really played with it anyway so it wouldn't have been through rough handling.

I took it back to the local store but because a) I hadn't paid for it, had no receipt and didn't want a refund and b) I had been constantly complaining to supermarkets due to food mis-labelling affecting DS1's allergies, I didn't want to go through the hassle of filling out yet more complaint forms. So I explained this to customer services and just said that the product should clearly be recalled as it was dangerous to newborns. They expressed the appropriate shock and concern and said they'd deal with it.

A couple of months later I was in the shop and saw the toys still there. I was furious and stomped to customer services. They were sympathetic but had no record of my complaint: because I hadn't filled out a form - my mistake!!

I did complain to Head Office - and I think (postnatal so hazy memory) I got a letter of apology from one of the big guys and a voucher which I returned in high dudgeon. However I may be confusing it with one of my any other tedious battles with supermarkets re their crappy food labelling (see above).

(I did say to Sainsbury's that I shan't bother with customer services if DS1 has an allergic reaction to one of their mis-labelled products again, I'll just sue them. And I just bloody might, too.)

BoffinMum · 05/09/2010 07:52

I would write to the Chief Exec by registered post myself. Mentioning Trading Standards. If nothing happened, I would ring Trading Standards, and then inform the Daily Mail about this thread.

thederkinsdame · 05/09/2010 22:00

Absolutely call Trading Standards - you may save a kids life if they are still on sale. The brushing label does not get them out of the CE laws which mean that a toy for kids under 3 has to be safe to be mouthed, as that's what babies do!

You might like to mention to Tesco bods as well that there is something called 'corporate manslaughter'. If a child dies from choking on a toy and they already knew about it, the head honchos could go to prison. That normally makes them take notice ;-)

thederkinsdame · 05/09/2010 22:01

Meant to say that there are consumer champions at the Guardian as well. I would contact them, as they are really good. I'd also contact Which and Watchdog.

AddictedToRadley · 05/09/2010 22:55

Great idea mentioning Corporate Manslaughter. That should add extra weight to my argument. Thank you VERY much!

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread