Firstly, my hospital are (generally) great :)
Secondly, I realise it's August...
However, I feel that if an SHO and Reg feel the need to engage in alpha behaviour/loud discussion about whether a patient is fit for surgery, whilst consistently misinterpreting the facts*, they might be better doing so where aforesaid patient cannot hear them.
Also, if you have a competent patient who has had major surgery and multiple admissions over the years, but happens to be disabled (getting themselves to the hospital and having two degrees in a medical area may be a small clue), you may want to spend time explaining the proedure to them, rather than explaining in words of one syllable and baby talk what you mean by words such as 'reg' and 'decay', and then when they ask about nerve damage telling them to ask at the (unnecessary) pre-op assessment...
AIBU to expect adequate treatment outside of my main condition's area? (given local hospital is one of 6/7 centres in the country for that condition).
This has left me boiling mad, but I don't feel complaints have the desired effect.
*If the history is medically complex to the extent that you both don't understand, it might be an idea to listen to the patient when they suggest people within your hospital that you might contact...the patient could have solved your loud arguement about what good would an ECG do?