I'll try to keep this brief; basically DD1 (4) was diagnosed with a peanut allergy when she was 13 months. She has never had an epipen or equivalent just antihistamines. We were told that as we controlled her diet that she shouldn't need one but this would be reviewed before she started school. I must add that she only ingested some peanut once, she got hives all over but was fine otherwise, but when she had the first skin prick test her reaction was described as "quite severe". She has been tested once a year since then and the last two years her reaction was less severe so the consultant said last year that if her reaction had decreased or Stayed the same this year they would do a food challenge before she started school. I have taken her today and her reaction is worse than the previous two years though not as bad as the first year she was tested. Her new consultant (old one now retired) says her reaction is too severe to risk doing a food challenge. Fair enough, but what I don't understand is why we haven't been given an epipen? I did ask the question but couldn't get a straight answer. Is anyone able to explain the general policy on epipens? Are they only prescribed to people who have suffered anaphylaxis? I suppose what I'm struggling to comprehend is why is it too dangerous to do a food challenge under controlled conditions but it's fine for her not to have an epipen? I'm afraid we really have been given no information since she was diagnosed with the allergy and I'm really rather worried now.