Thanks for posting. I have only skim read it, but it seems excellent.
For adopters, this is particularly important when
a) contributing to assessments and
b) giving feedback on anything social workers have written:
LANGUAGE THAT TRIGGERS PROTECTION
Use: necessary, required, essential, must have, without which [harm/impact]. Avoid: would be helpful, might benefit, could consider, desirable. The difference is not semantic - it determines which legal duties apply.
This is another very important aspect:
SIBLING SAFEGUARDING - CRITICAL PRINCIPLE
Where support for one sibling is essential to protect the welfare of another, this creates an enhanced duty to assess and provide services. Sibling-on-sibling harm must be treated with the same seriousness as any other safeguarding concern.
And I like this comment:
THE FAMILY'S ROLE
The family's role is to PARENT. They should not be left to case-manage multiple services. That is what the Reg 16(4) coordinator is for. Taking this burden off the family is central to helping adoptions succeed.
It is completely unclear who is supposed to do the coordinating if several services are involved. In our case, it is certainly me.