DS is 4 and cannot remember a time when he didn't live with me. I have drip fed him bits of his life story. He also has a photo album exclusively covering his time in foster care which we sometimes talk through. He doesn't ask many questions though, and doesn't seem very interested. His life story book came very late, more than two years after the adoption order. I got some changes made to it - there were factual inaccuracies and the meatier parts were worded as if for an adult. But in spite of the changes I'd say it's still pitched to at least 8+, and without going into detail, I don't like it and it isn't fit for purpose.
I've read Joy Rees's book and I'm all set to redo the life story book from scratch using the format she proposes, which I am completely sold on.
I feel I can do a decent job on this. However I've got three niggles. If anyone has experience with any of these I'd love to know how you dealt with them.
The first (easiest) one is the format. I know life story books are typically loose leaf. I am not much of a scrapbooker and was actually thinking of doing something a bit more permanent looking like a photo book. I realise this stops it being continued but is rather a point in time. I think I'd be okay with this but interested in what others have done.
Secondly there is a huge gap in information around introductions and specifically no photos apart from the few I took of ds on his own. A group photo was taken by the SW but due to staff changes and two years passing nobody, and I've checked, knows where it is. I am still in occasional phone contact with FC although we haven't seen each other since intros. She would love for us to go and see her, which I am tempted to do. We won't be able to relive introductions but it would give us a chance to take some photos and put the FC back in DS's memory. It might seem a bit contrived now but years down the line it could be something worth looking back on and may just plug the gap. Good idea or bad idea?
And finally, I'd be especially interested to hear from anyone whose DC has a sibling that remained with the birth family and how this is presented in the life story book, or indeed how you've discussed it. We all know the narrative of the parent(s) who couldn't care for DC or couldn't keep DC safe and this is all finalised by the wise old judge. How do you present that story when another wise old judge two years later says the exact opposite about parenting a younger sibling? I've only touched on this very briefly with ds and he thinks it is some kind of pretend play. I can only imagine as he gets older and understands more this could be a sticking point as it seems so illogical.