Sorry to start a sort of thread about a thread, but can you help me work out something please?
There is a thread over in chat about wording re gifts in a christening invite. Cue the normal MN opinion that mentioning gifts - esp cash - is very "grabby". I posted that when DD was christened we were clear that we didn't expect presents but we were seeking to build up DD's child trust fund and donations would be gratefully received. I said that as DD is adopted we weren't able to start her CTF at birth as with DS's and we wanted to make up this disparity. My point was (probably poorly expressed) there are surely certain circumstances when "usual " etiquette doesn't apply. But I was told I was just using DD's adoption as an excuse for being grabby.
Anyway, I know I shouldn't let it get to me - it's a bit late now anyway! - and perhaps I'm just feeling a bit more sensitive following all the crap here lately about us rotten adopters in cahoots with the evil baby snatchers. But we were - and still are - concerned to ensure that there are as few disparities between our birth child and our adopted child as possible, and at that time the difference in CTF was something we thought we actually do something about. And we also thought that our family and friends would mostly be happy to help in this respect - or at least not be offended (DD had a mixture of presents / money and presents / money).
Anyway, please don't bother telling me if you think I'm grabby
, my question is whether you have also done things that would normally be seen as not the Done Thing, particularly in order to try to level the playing field for your adopted child/ren?
Thanks