I'm not under 50, but I'm on FTCs so keep having to apply again & again.
Don't most seniors have a "Research Esteem" statement at top, now? All the WHO panels or national commissions you're on, the keynote address you gave to Natural England annual conf, the 6 former PhD students who went on to jointly get nominated for a Nobel prize, the 25 times you reviewed for the BMJ, that article you wrote that got cited 2000 times in 1st year, the editorials you were invited to write for QJof Econ etc.
Being more junior, My CV is a hybrid style, maybe. Has a 2 column "skills" summary at top (about 1/4 of the top page). Left side is a simple phrase summary, right side is detail, no more than 3 types of attributes. This section I tailor to the specific job essential attributes. Like you might have sections that say
() Research Esteem: All the commissions & panels & history that makes strangers defer to your opinions in 2nd column
() Accomplished PI (detail about big grants you were PI on, include specific £££££ in 2nd column)
() Leader, mentor and lecturer (detail about admin roles, things that add kudos to internal Uni operation, course convening experience)
After that I have things like employment history (& duties, get the buzzwords in), my qualifications, extra skills (foreign languages) etc. Pubs start on 4th or 5th page.
I also (re)organise my publications section (it's hitting 11? pages now & spans multiple areas so it needs structure! ) by types of publications relevant to the audience or context, so 1st author in target topic at top, joint author in target topic next, then other publications in peer review, than the rest maybe.