Hi everyone,
As above, I wondered if someone would be kind enough to spell out the difference between reader and principal lecturer? I assume that reader focuses on research whereas PL is more of a management role? Are they both of a level in terms of seniority? I have looked at a few adverts and it is actually quite hard to tell the difference as criteria and salary seem broadly similar as far as I can tell!
I am research-focused and would like to stay where I am and pursue promotion to reader but my university has a very poor record re. internal promotions so I am now reluctantly looking to move. I am currently an SL. I have seen a couple of roles at PL in my area but nothing at reader and not sure why and whether I should apply for PL instead.
As per username, am in social sciences. And at a post-92 institution as that may have a bearing also.
Any thoughts on the above would be very helpful, thanks!