Oh dear. I don't think I want to look. It really sucks - and the amount of effort we make in first year to respond to all the things, when by the time they leave they don't even remember, is massively frustrating. But the way our School works, first year is much easier to top-down give guidance than final year, which is all small classes run by scattered people.
My news is I just heard - I didn't get Professor. Sigh. Basically, the Internal Committee were exactly right. I'm actually not too upset, but still a bit mad at the Internal Committee: it was billed as something to help us, but didn't - and several people declined to give me feedback because I'd be getting that "great" feedback - and I've also learned it also fed into the HoS's assessment - so kind of a self-fullfilling prophecy. They decided I wasn't good enough for a particular reason, advised the HoS who wrote me a letter assessing my suitability relaying this information, and lo-and-behold, that's the exact outcome of the Promotions Committee. And when they gave feedback with less than a week to the deadline, several weeks after I'd lined up high-profile international referees - it wasn't like I could back out at that point.
I think perhaps I'm not too upset as I've been expecting this for a while - basically, ever since I learned the HoS took the advice of the Internal Committee! They totally didn't tell us that was what it was for. So more frustrated with the School 'support' than the Uni process, if that makes sense? If I hadn't used the Internal Committee (as it was, in fact, optional) I might have gotten stronger support from my Head, as I know he had a much more positive attitude regarding my research than came out of the Internal Committee. Also very frustrating that the Internal Committee had some misconceptions that I corrected when I finally was able to back-think their feedback, but that wouldn't have been passed to HoS.
And also, I knew it was my research that was the weakest anyway - so all the above could have still happened, but I think the process just made it much more likely. Slightly frustrating that people can get to Prof on "research only" as research stars, with truly crap teaching (or, in some cases, complete lack of teaching), but someone like me with really good teaching and 'pretty good' research can't. I had been banking on a balancing out with the new words about respecting teaching and such, but I guess it is still very research-focussed anyway.
And, sorry for going on so long, I think I'm working out my thoughts live here.