Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What do you think of Burnham's plans re inheritance tax?

406 replies

JoyousOpalLemur · 23/06/2026 11:16

He has said in the past that he wants to abolish inheritance tax and replaced it with a social care levy on inherited assets, which will incorporate unused pensions.

I don't totally understand this if I'm honest - I think it means everyone will be dragged into the inheritance tax threshold, but it seems like a fairer tax than what currently exists, and it's there for a purpose (to fund social care).

What do you think?

https://www.independent.co.uk/money/burnham-prime-minister-money-taxes-mortgages-bonds-stamp-duty-b3001078.html

What Andy Burnham as prime minister might mean for your money

The Makerfield by-election winner has spoken out on income tax, stamp duty and more – so what might change?

https://www.independent.co.uk/money/burnham-prime-minister-money-taxes-mortgages-bonds-stamp-duty-b3001078.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
cupfinalchaos · 27/06/2026 20:48

patooties · 27/06/2026 15:14

So who should pay for your social care do your kids can inherit hundreds of thousands? Lol

We should pay for our own social care and anything left over should go to our kids as we’ve been taxed on it already!

Snoopymayhem · 27/06/2026 20:59

cupfinalchaos · 27/06/2026 20:48

We should pay for our own social care and anything left over should go to our kids as we’ve been taxed on it already!

Which is the current system but not working as it’s taking up too much of council money
Hence the 10% IHT for everyone

furimosa · 27/06/2026 21:25

anyolddinosaur · 27/06/2026 14:32

I cant keep up with all the misinformation on this thread.

The over 70s in this country now pay more in income tax than those under 30.

There was no free childcare for todays pensioners and family allowances were considerably less than universal credit. The young now get more out of the system in benefits than pensioners received at the same age. The data are published somewhere, you'll find it if you look. Todays pensioners expected to pay for those older than them, they didnt expect help with childcare or rent but they didnt expect to be funding their children too.

The irony of this post!

The over 70s paying more tax is due to the fact many under 30s are too young to pay tax & a larger population of the over 70s, demographics are different now.

Family allowance is not the same as universal credit. And family allowance in the past was universal.

Pensioners have taken more out of the system then they have paid in.

They didn’t expect help with housing costs? How come 1 in 3 homes were social housing in the past? 🤔

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

furimosa · 27/06/2026 21:26

Snoopymayhem · 27/06/2026 20:59

Which is the current system but not working as it’s taking up too much of council money
Hence the 10% IHT for everyone

In part the current system struggles because most people don’t actually end up in care homes but have care in the home which doesn’t touch housing wealth.

AlexiaH · 05/07/2026 01:28

Nahh another BS idea to control people by minimising their assets. Just attempting to dip into the pockets of people who have worked and saved and have something to leave as inheritance. You could of lived in the family home throughout your life and to think upon inheritance you then have to worry about Gov thieves giving it - now you have to pay us whatever %!! Beyond disgusting. Whatever you inherit is your “security” and again it’s an attempt on making people have as little as possible and making life harder. Yet they always moaning “too many people are depressed/ anxious/ as more”. Very obvious why

Snoopymayhem · 05/07/2026 01:33

AlexiaH · 05/07/2026 01:28

Nahh another BS idea to control people by minimising their assets. Just attempting to dip into the pockets of people who have worked and saved and have something to leave as inheritance. You could of lived in the family home throughout your life and to think upon inheritance you then have to worry about Gov thieves giving it - now you have to pay us whatever %!! Beyond disgusting. Whatever you inherit is your “security” and again it’s an attempt on making people have as little as possible and making life harder. Yet they always moaning “too many people are depressed/ anxious/ as more”. Very obvious why

Whilst I disagree with the LVT I think this one to pay for the elderly in care homes when they need it is good
Much better than self funders selling their homes and paying for themselves and paying for random strangers in the room next door that the council don’t pay enough for
Now that is pure theft !

10% from everyone with assets giving everyone security isn’t a bad idea

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread