Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Today’s Social Media Ban Announcement: Discussion

470 replies

ByeByeTikTok · 15/06/2026 06:44

I haven’t seen a thread for today’s expected ban on social media for Under 16s so thought I’d start one. If there already is one pls link and I’ll get this deleted.

What will it likely include?
What won’t it include?
How do you and your kids feel about it, especially if they’re already using it?
Will you follow it, and when?
Will people try to get round it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 09:59

TheWineoftheChicken · 15/06/2026 09:59

My daughters are 13 and 11 and don’t have any social media. I don’t think either of them will be fussed about having to wait a bit longer. In fact I think my eldest will be relieved that she has an excuse to avoid it for longer without the peer pressure.

And you are not fussy about having the government monitor your own internet usage?

TheWineoftheChicken · 15/06/2026 10:00

TrayBakesAreSweet · 15/06/2026 09:50

Not sure how I feel on a personal level. My youngest has been unable to attend school or even complete any schoolwork due to a combination of severe mental and physical health issues. He is virtually agoraphobic. Social media is how he stays in touch with the couple of friends he has left. But I agree with the ban in principle. I have had some experience of the negative impact on my now 17yo other son and have had reason to curse the day we ever gave him a phone. Thankfully he uses social media pretty sensibly these days and has other interests that keep him off it most of the time.

I don’t think WhatsApp comes under the scope of the ban so hopefully he can still keep in touch with friends?

Worldinyourhands · 15/06/2026 10:00

EasternStandard · 15/06/2026 09:49

Wouldn’t face scans be enough?

They're hugely inaccurate. My phone recently refused to believe I was over 16 and BELIEVE ME I really fucking am! 😂

Tucker567 · 15/06/2026 10:01

igotitbadforyou · 15/06/2026 06:46

I admit I’m not a parent but having seen the impact of social media on kids I think it’s a good thing.

My 8 year old niece begs me for a skincare routine, asks for retinol and the various acids, says she’s too fat, says she’s not good enough at dancing, etc etc.

That is so sad 😪

DixonD · 15/06/2026 10:01

LateDecember · 15/06/2026 06:58

So, everyone will have to prove their age and then parents will just pass the phone to the kid after verification. Sounds like a great plan.

This is exactly what I will do. But then my child uses her phone sensibly and I can trust her 🤷‍♀️

Thankfully she has little interest in SM because it’s not a novelty to her - and this is where the issues are going to crop up with others that are not allowed to have any access.

TheWineoftheChicken · 15/06/2026 10:01

BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 09:59

And you are not fussy about having the government monitor your own internet usage?

Eh? My post was about how my children will feel about the ban. I didn’t mention my own feelings.

EasternStandard · 15/06/2026 10:02

BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 09:54

The face scans will be linked to your digital ID (face scans for age are not reliable) in the same way it is to your banking app. The digital id will also be linked to you passport, social security, banking, nhs etc.

Fark

Mepop · 15/06/2026 10:02

I am a bit concerned about restrictions for 17 and 16 year olds. It is not clear from news reports but I heard they will be restricting their access too. Seems too controlling for that age group. I can see a future where they start controlling adult use too.

DixonD · 15/06/2026 10:03

OneWebsiteissue · 15/06/2026 06:53

This is my concern, the children who are on devices because the parent/s are avoiding parenting will still be without that and that really will need addressing, they aren’t suddenly going to skip out making daisy chains and actually having a childhood instead they’ll be bored and unparented just without a screen.

Edited

They’ll still have screens - it’s not impossible to get round this ID verification- an adult will just have to do it. Parents who don’t parent will happily do this.

TaddleTales · 15/06/2026 10:03

As a teacher, I'm thrilled. From Y4/5, we have parents calling up, emailing, kicking off at parents' evening about the bulling that takes place on Snapchat etc and expect us to deal with it. Also, bad language/inappropriate games which parents just roll their eyes at and blame TikTok for.

Being able to turn around and say, "It's ILLEGAL for your 10 year old to have access to those apps." will hopefully force them to start taking some responsibility for it.

TheWineoftheChicken · 15/06/2026 10:04

DixonD · 15/06/2026 10:01

This is exactly what I will do. But then my child uses her phone sensibly and I can trust her 🤷‍♀️

Thankfully she has little interest in SM because it’s not a novelty to her - and this is where the issues are going to crop up with others that are not allowed to have any access.

My 13 year old has no access to social media and also no desire to have any access. She’s never once asked to have it. If she did, I would have let her have it as she’s also very sensible. So I don’t think it’s a massive ‘novelty’ to her TBH, she’s just not interested.

BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 10:04

ilovemybluesharpie · 15/06/2026 09:59

The main issue is parenting. When you see babies with phones propped in front of them so that the parent can eat in peace, you can see where it is all going wrong. Toddlers pushed around in pushchairs watching screens. Parents don't interact with their kids, they just want them to be quiet.

I would never let DD have my phone when she was a toddler. It was expensive and bought for work not for a toddler to play with.

I was at an event where all the 10-16's were sat in a row on phones, not talking to each other. It is so sad. It took 1 parent to take the phone from their child to make all of them stop and interact with each other.

DD is 18 now but has never been into Insta or Tiktok. I have brought her up to see how shallow a lot of the stuff is, and how the influencers are being paid and don't really care or believe about the products.

Girls especially need to grow up normal, not thinking that they have to have huge lips and massive eyelashes to be accepted.

When DD was at school there were girls doing TT's in the classroom during lessons. They were all pouting on Insta from 11, wearing tiny crop tops and mini skirts. Where are the parents?

I agree that mobile phones should be banned in schools and I think that Insta and TT should be banned for secondary school pupils.

But if, as pp suggest, parents could log on and hand the phone to their children, then it wouldn’t stop this. This could only be stopped if the government started regularly scanning your face whilst monitoring your usage as an ADULT.

Worldinyourhands · 15/06/2026 10:06

DixonD · 15/06/2026 10:01

This is exactly what I will do. But then my child uses her phone sensibly and I can trust her 🤷‍♀️

Thankfully she has little interest in SM because it’s not a novelty to her - and this is where the issues are going to crop up with others that are not allowed to have any access.

Exactly this.

Growing up, one of my friends wasn't allowed sweets and she used to lose her mind and stuff her face on them when she had the opportunity at friends' houses. And later would sneak them into her home and eat them in bed at night. The rest of us liked sweets too but we weren't sneaking from our secret stashes at midnight and then not telling our parents why we had a stomach ache.

Same will be the case for social media. The kids who don't have access will sneak access (or come to it at 18) and have no clue how to navigate it sensibly and will have nobody to talk to them (yes, PARENT them) through the bumps of social media.

Tucker567 · 15/06/2026 10:06

AllJoyAndNoFun · 15/06/2026 07:02

My DC are 15 and 13 now. It won't affect the 15 year old as by the time it becomes law he'll be 16. Honestly, I think it probably wont impact the 13 (then 14 year old) that much as I think it will be too ingrained in their group and I pick my battles. I also think it's obvious that there will always be parents who will verify for their kids and not care that it's illegal.

Where I think it will be really beneficial is that it will stop the universality of SM use from increasingly young ages and the presumption that everyone has it. It will be easier for parents to push back. It will benefit the kids who are not on SM yet.

(bit like smoking restrictions impacted uptake more than quitting).

I think it is a pretty accurate and balanced view of it. As a parent to 4 & 8 year olds I am pleased about it as it should be easier for me to push back.

Most parents in DC's school are very keen to keep kids away from social media but were worried they were fighting a losing battle. Hopefully this helps us all!

BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 10:06

TheWineoftheChicken · 15/06/2026 10:01

Eh? My post was about how my children will feel about the ban. I didn’t mention my own feelings.

Which is why I am asking you about how you would feel having all your internet usage monitored by government as that is what is actually being proposed here.

Worldinyourhands · 15/06/2026 10:07

TaddleTales · 15/06/2026 10:03

As a teacher, I'm thrilled. From Y4/5, we have parents calling up, emailing, kicking off at parents' evening about the bulling that takes place on Snapchat etc and expect us to deal with it. Also, bad language/inappropriate games which parents just roll their eyes at and blame TikTok for.

Being able to turn around and say, "It's ILLEGAL for your 10 year old to have access to those apps." will hopefully force them to start taking some responsibility for it.

There's no gaming ban so they'll still be on games, and on the new apps that pop up to replace the banned ones.

anothereastlondonmum · 15/06/2026 10:07

I felt quite emotional when I heard KS making the announcement. It felt like a weight being lifted and sense has prevailed. These companies have been mining all our lives for profit for too long, and shaping and moulding the world of our kids - well no more!

Yes some teens will get around it- they always will. I’m sure kids used to undo their seat belts when that was first banned. But a generation of younger kids who have not yet been exposed are now protected. Not having social media will be normalised. I’m really pleased.

relaxitsok · 15/06/2026 10:07

There are definitely tensions about privacy and the reach of state control. But on this one, if it’s between children’s mind and brain being controlled by companies who want to addict them and mine them for data - or less privacy - I will accept it.

It probably is poorly thought out. But something has to be done to try and change what is happening and I am absolutely delighted today.

Thinkbiglittleone · 15/06/2026 10:11

I am really happy with the ban, and I definitely think it is a step in the right direction.

i know parents who have been very hopeful of the ban, as once it is illegal, it will make it easier for them to take it off their child. Yes they should be able to Just say no, but they struggle to do so, this will hopefully help them.

There will always be children and parents who work around the ban and still facilitate their children using it, but if it saves a large amount of children from using it, then I think it’s worth it. If it also encourages parents to look into the damage social media is actually doing to our children, that is also a benefit.

Worldinyourhands · 15/06/2026 10:11

DixonD · 15/06/2026 10:03

They’ll still have screens - it’s not impossible to get round this ID verification- an adult will just have to do it. Parents who don’t parent will happily do this.

Parents who DO parent will happily do this too. I am a very, very involved parent. I know exactly what social media my kids have and what they do on it. A lot of it is really fun and joyful, by the way! There's a lot of great stuff on the internet and opening up the world is often very enriching. But anyway I decide what my kids have access to, not the government, so I wont' hesitate to bypass any controls. As a result my kids will continue to have open dialogue with me about the less joyful parts of social media and I'll be able to help guide and parent them through those too.

Dweeb63 · 15/06/2026 10:12

anothereastlondonmum · 15/06/2026 10:07

I felt quite emotional when I heard KS making the announcement. It felt like a weight being lifted and sense has prevailed. These companies have been mining all our lives for profit for too long, and shaping and moulding the world of our kids - well no more!

Yes some teens will get around it- they always will. I’m sure kids used to undo their seat belts when that was first banned. But a generation of younger kids who have not yet been exposed are now protected. Not having social media will be normalised. I’m really pleased.

Yeah it really fucks me off when I hear the whole “these Silicone Valley Tech Company CEOs don’t let their kids near social media” statements. And yet we see stupid enough to let them make billions off the back of ours.

TheseWordsAreMine · 15/06/2026 10:13

BrookStreamRiverlet · 15/06/2026 09:59

And you are not fussy about having the government monitor your own internet usage?

We have always been at war with eurasia.

sittingonabeach · 15/06/2026 10:13

@BrookStreamRiverlet hopefully it will make parents think more (or some parents anyway). We were lucky that when DS was little phone/social media usage was not like it is today, so he was very much the generation being entertained by colouring books, sticker books, card games etc when out and about. Hopefully, this will again become more of the norm for many families. Of course there will be families who will carry on as they are, and others who will circumvent the ban or happily watch their teens circumvent the ban, but hopefully the shift may go towards less use of social media.

Local colleges are in the process of banning phones during school hours (in lockable pouches) They are planning to get card games and other resources so pupils can have things to interact with their peers. Colleges who have already been down this road have found most students easily adapt

TaddleTales · 15/06/2026 10:14

Worldinyourhands · 15/06/2026 10:07

There's no gaming ban so they'll still be on games, and on the new apps that pop up to replace the banned ones.

Sorry - I meant games they play in the playground/classroom that are off the back of TikTok trends - not digital games.

OneHardyRobin · 15/06/2026 10:14

MrsMurphyIWish · 15/06/2026 06:57

How can it be implemented? The apps have a minimum age use current try but children still use them as they’re just registered with a different date of birth. This will still require parental input to manage - which is the current issue!

I think everyone should have to upload ID to hold SM accounts. Online behaviour would definitely improve if people knew they can be identified and children won’t be able to just open a new account with a made up DOB. It would also be much easier to control and limit access/viewing content depending on actual age.