We broke down in Scotland while on holiday
RAC patrol advised not to drive the car as suspected turbo failure or timing chain failure.
Diagnostic codes and symptoms pointed to turbo failure
Car engine was still turning over, there was oil in the oil place etc.
30 days later and the car finally got recovered to our garage in England (which was a huge battle, terrible customer service and communication, and it went missing along the way)
It arrived with massive scratches on one side
Flat battery
Hydrolocked engine needing full replacement due to catastrophic failure
No oil
One mile increase on the odometer
Laypersons who have knowledge of the model have suggested that this is consistent with the car having been driven following turbo failure. (Failure causes oil to sit in cylinders, turning the engine over or driving causes oil to be sucked into engine and killing it)
it’s our position that the car needed significant but affordable (£3k) repairs but due to the negligent recovery process whereupon they didn’t even know where the car was and it went through at least 3 sub contractors, those repairs have been magnified into a car that now needs full engine replacement and is not economically viable to repair.
RAC has ‘investigated’ and said that no, because the technical team have looked at the original diagnostics and spoken to original patrol and said it already had catastrophic engine failure, that the engine was cutting out (it wasn’t and I have a video) and that it was the timing chain. They are closing the complaint and we have to go to ombudsman.
there are no timing chain fault codes
it was not hydrolocked before they took custody
they have ignored the battery, scratches, and odometer change.
does anyone have any advice or has anyone been in a similar situation?