Page 13 | Katie Price pregnant at 47 with new husband

Playingvideogames · 19/02/2026 07:41

BeeHive909 · 18/02/2026 23:42

She needs help and fast, this isn’t normal. She isn’t pregnant. She said in an interview in 2023 that she needs a surrogate as she has no eggs. But yet every guy she’s been with recently she’s been pregnant and had a miscarriage. We all know it’s not true. Her loved ones and family are failing her. She needs rehab and food. She can’t let go of the fact she’s washed up now and not as famous as she used to be.

She’s beyond help. Rehab/therapy can’t solve everything, if it could then we would have far fewer mentally ill people. She’s a nasty person and this has been compounded by fame, drugs and narcissism. There is no hope for her.

NormasArse · 19/02/2026 07:47

DyslexicPoster · 18/02/2026 16:14

I doubt it's true. She is a million miles from the type of person I am, but she doesn't deserve all the hate. Sure she has made mistakes and the driving stuff is inexcusable. But she is a great mum to Harvey. As a mum to a disabled child I don't think it's fair to jump on the 'no she isnt' bandwagon is easy where there is no idea what it's like for her.

I watched her TV program of her looking for his post 18 setting and thought I wouldn't want to come against her. She isn't perfect. But she isn't Satan either. If she is ( which I doubt) then whatever happens she will love the child. Woman who don't love their kids, let their partners beat, abuse and kill their kids get less stick than Katie. Why? I bet Shannon Matthews mum doesn't get half this hatred.

I watched that programme and felt some solidarity, as a mum of a disabled child.

Then she was prosecuted for animal neglect, so she can fuck off with her fly on the wall, curated TV lifestyle. It’s all fake, she’s a horror.

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 07:57

Her instagram page is nasty. No mention of a baby

how has she gotten married again? ?? 🤣

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 07:59

She’s obviously not a good mum. I don’t know why people always say that

based on what? One bloody documentary about Harvey years ago and every says she’s Mother Earth

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 08:02

She made a
tv show couple of years ago which documented her ivf journey. The conclusion was she can’t conceive naturally or with her own eggs

that was totally different husband. He’s now left her. She’s been through a couple of boyfriends since then and has remarried!

she needs therapy

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 08:05

Remember about a year ago, she posted something about having had twins. They turned out to be dolls

Neveranynamesleft · 19/02/2026 08:11

It isn't going to end well, thats for sure.

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 08:38

ShawnaMacallister · 19/02/2026 07:37

I AM TALKING ABOUT HER YOUNGER TWO CHILDREN WHO WERE REMOVED BY THE COURT AFTER YEARS OF SOCIAL WORK INVOLVEMENT

You do realise it costs the public purse a huge amount to protect children from neglectful and abusive parents? The average cost to the local authority (and therefore to the public) of care proceedings is £120000. Plus the parents get legal aid and the child via their guardian. Prior to that you've got costs associated with social work involvement and after care proceedings concluded also. Katie Price's neglect of her children has cost the taxpayer upwards of £200k (and that's a conservative estimate).

Show quote history

Council collects more than that from me

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 19/02/2026 08:50

She’s a disaster no question. He’s shady. They kind of deserve each other but for the sake of humanity she should be sterilised.

’having his baby’ I think is probably her attempt to hint that she intends to have his baby and is not (thankfully, hopefully) actually up the duff.

Sartre · 19/02/2026 08:53

It won’t be true, didn’t she troll everyone with a new ‘baby’ once and it turned out to be a doll? She needs constant attention. It’s difficult for her to achieve now she’s nearing 50 so she has to get increasingly more outrageous. Even if she had a miraculous baby at 47, it would be removed like her other children.

blubberball · 19/02/2026 09:07

I don't understand people who say Oh but she's a wonderful mother. Is she? I just see an irresponsible druggie who drives whilst banned and flips cars, neglects and kills pets, financially irresponsible, let her house go to ruin, has a new man in the kid's lives every other day and cares more about going off on more holidays and getting more cosmetic surgeries. She constantly leaves her kids with other people to look after, and they get taken away from her because she doesn't look after them. Instead of protecting her son, she parades him on social media and uses him for content. I don't understand in what world is she a good mother?

For some reason, she's not been locked up for any of her offences

TheToteBagLady · 19/02/2026 11:22

@blubberball I don’t think anybody says that 😂

DyslexicPoster · 19/02/2026 11:45

She is engaged and proactive in Harvey's education and placements. She has has a good understanding and patience with him. In that respect she musters up strength that not everyone with a complex needs child can due to exhaustion etc. In that respect she is a good mum. Like most mums she isn't 100% perfect 100% of the time but she doesn't lack love and passion for them. Just because your a train wreck or addict doesn't automatically exclude a deep love of your kids. Her heart is in the right place. Her MH prevents her meeting her potential to match her love to the way she parents. I don't think it's because she doesn't care to sort out her life. It's because she doesn't have the stability to get there.

I don't think there is 100% conscious choice about her bad desisions. Plus this is her only living. Who honestly could pull off being a role model mum as a public sex worker? She has been exploited from a young girl. I just can't find the vitriol to hate her.

I'm sure she wants her kids to be stable and happy. But for whatever reason she can't match that. Lots of mums don't love their kids but live in nice houses, send their kids to private schools. Do good stable respectful jobs. Have a good respectful "front" but they inside they don't have a deep passionate love or cuddle and praise. Society says that a mum who has kids because it's the done thing but criticises, emotionally neglects them but has a nice house, job, car is better than than the mum with four kids with four dads but loves them all deeply but can't quite meet all their needs due to time, money etc. Maybe both types are selfish and feckless. Aren't we all? I'm not perfect. My hearts in the right place and 90% of the time I'm trying to give 100% My 100% might look different to more capable mum. I'm doing MY best.

I think she is trying her best. But maybe this is her giving her 110%. I'd be a mess if had the online hate she has.

Itsasecretnow · 19/02/2026 12:01

Arlanymor · 18/02/2026 17:34

Same and I’m now itching to use it IRL!

Show quote history

Me too 😄 I do hope it wasn’t a typo, but even so I’m going to find a way to use it soon. Good luck! 😂

DevilsFoot · 19/02/2026 12:08

DyslexicPoster · 19/02/2026 11:45

She is engaged and proactive in Harvey's education and placements. She has has a good understanding and patience with him. In that respect she musters up strength that not everyone with a complex needs child can due to exhaustion etc. In that respect she is a good mum. Like most mums she isn't 100% perfect 100% of the time but she doesn't lack love and passion for them. Just because your a train wreck or addict doesn't automatically exclude a deep love of your kids. Her heart is in the right place. Her MH prevents her meeting her potential to match her love to the way she parents. I don't think it's because she doesn't care to sort out her life. It's because she doesn't have the stability to get there.

I don't think there is 100% conscious choice about her bad desisions. Plus this is her only living. Who honestly could pull off being a role model mum as a public sex worker? She has been exploited from a young girl. I just can't find the vitriol to hate her.

I'm sure she wants her kids to be stable and happy. But for whatever reason she can't match that. Lots of mums don't love their kids but live in nice houses, send their kids to private schools. Do good stable respectful jobs. Have a good respectful "front" but they inside they don't have a deep passionate love or cuddle and praise. Society says that a mum who has kids because it's the done thing but criticises, emotionally neglects them but has a nice house, job, car is better than than the mum with four kids with four dads but loves them all deeply but can't quite meet all their needs due to time, money etc. Maybe both types are selfish and feckless. Aren't we all? I'm not perfect. My hearts in the right place and 90% of the time I'm trying to give 100% My 100% might look different to more capable mum. I'm doing MY best.

I think she is trying her best. But maybe this is her giving her 110%. I'd be a mess if had the online hate she has.

Look up the Fathers4Justice info on her. You are way off in your assessment of Price. Social services do not remove kids lightly.

Harvey was largely looked after by her mother and live in residences.

purpleygrey · 19/02/2026 12:15

DevilsFoot · 19/02/2026 12:08

Look up the Fathers4Justice info on her. You are way off in your assessment of Price. Social services do not remove kids lightly.

Harvey was largely looked after by her mother and live in residences.

Show quote history

yeah because F4J are well known for their fact checking and credibility 🙄

ThatCyanCat · 19/02/2026 12:18

She's awful, but I wouldn't trust F4J to give a weather report.

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 12:22

DevilsFoot · 19/02/2026 12:08

Look up the Fathers4Justice info on her. You are way off in your assessment of Price. Social services do not remove kids lightly.

Harvey was largely looked after by her mother and live in residences.

Show quote history

Sorry, I wanted to comment that that’s not entirely true, children can be removed fairly lightly whilst they conduct their investigation, particularly if they’re staying with other family members. Social work teams can be very lax, or very averse to risk.

We don’t know the circumstances surrounding Katie’s kids, but what I would say is her behaviour is very dysfunctional. I can’t imagine her sticking out through the court process to sort it out, and she hasn’t shown herself to be the most responsible in marrying this strange bloke after one week.

ShawnaMacallister · 19/02/2026 12:30

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 12:22

Sorry, I wanted to comment that that’s not entirely true, children can be removed fairly lightly whilst they conduct their investigation, particularly if they’re staying with other family members. Social work teams can be very lax, or very averse to risk.

We don’t know the circumstances surrounding Katie’s kids, but what I would say is her behaviour is very dysfunctional. I can’t imagine her sticking out through the court process to sort it out, and she hasn’t shown herself to be the most responsible in marrying this strange bloke after one week.

Show quote history

Children really cannot be removed lightly. Even if you believe that social work teams can be risk averse parents also get legal representation and the child gets a guardian, if the social work team make an application to remove a child on flimsy evidence (which does happen) the guardian and parents barristers will push back and the judge won't approve it. There is also plenty of evidence that KP had social work involvement for a long time before they were actually removed. Not from F4J sources either.

this happened at least 7 months before the local authority applied to court and this was a significant time after social services got involved which from court paperwork that is public (though anon) suggests was from way back to 2020

www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12795743/amp/Katie-Prices-social-worker-breaks-cover-driving-reality-TV-stars-children-sacked-council-getting-close-ex-model.html

EdwinStarrTheBackStreetsNSoul · 19/02/2026 12:40

pouletvous · 19/02/2026 07:59

She’s obviously not a good mum. I don’t know why people always say that

based on what? One bloody documentary about Harvey years ago and every says she’s Mother Earth

Harvey only got wheeled out as an accessorie so she could turn a buck.
Good mums do not exploit their children or go on coke runs and crash the car.

whynotwhatknot · 19/02/2026 12:50

shes had help for harvey since day one may parents dont have any at all

sh treats him lik a accesory meets and greets the man is disabled its disgusting

noone can force someone to get help shes so arrogant sh dosnt think she needs it

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 13:37

ShawnaMacallister · 19/02/2026 12:30

Children really cannot be removed lightly. Even if you believe that social work teams can be risk averse parents also get legal representation and the child gets a guardian, if the social work team make an application to remove a child on flimsy evidence (which does happen) the guardian and parents barristers will push back and the judge won't approve it. There is also plenty of evidence that KP had social work involvement for a long time before they were actually removed. Not from F4J sources either.

this happened at least 7 months before the local authority applied to court and this was a significant time after social services got involved which from court paperwork that is public (though anon) suggests was from way back to 2020

www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12795743/amp/Katie-Prices-social-worker-breaks-cover-driving-reality-TV-stars-children-sacked-council-getting-close-ex-model.html

Show quote history

Well, I disagree to an extent.

A child can be removed under a section 20 without a judge’s involvement. Yes, it can later be discharged but in reality, the investigation needs to run its course first. Evidence needs to be tested and assessments need to be undertaken before the flimsy evidence can be dismissed as flimsy. A judge isn’t going to be super opposed to a family placement whilst this happens.

Not saying this is the case in Katie’s case, we don’t know, but these are my general views. Do we know why Katie’s family was involved with SS? I don’t remember reading the reason.

DevilsFoot · 19/02/2026 13:40

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 13:37

Well, I disagree to an extent.

A child can be removed under a section 20 without a judge’s involvement. Yes, it can later be discharged but in reality, the investigation needs to run its course first. Evidence needs to be tested and assessments need to be undertaken before the flimsy evidence can be dismissed as flimsy. A judge isn’t going to be super opposed to a family placement whilst this happens.

Not saying this is the case in Katie’s case, we don’t know, but these are my general views. Do we know why Katie’s family was involved with SS? I don’t remember reading the reason.

Show quote history

Every single one of her children were removed. Harvey was in residential care anyway. I think that says a lot.

ShawnaMacallister · 19/02/2026 13:50

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 13:37

Well, I disagree to an extent.

A child can be removed under a section 20 without a judge’s involvement. Yes, it can later be discharged but in reality, the investigation needs to run its course first. Evidence needs to be tested and assessments need to be undertaken before the flimsy evidence can be dismissed as flimsy. A judge isn’t going to be super opposed to a family placement whilst this happens.

Not saying this is the case in Katie’s case, we don’t know, but these are my general views. Do we know why Katie’s family was involved with SS? I don’t remember reading the reason.

Show quote history

Section 20 is not 'removal' because it requires parental consent. You're confusing two very different processes. Children can be accommodated under section 20 with parental consent that can be withdrawn at any time. It doesn't have to be 'discharged' because it's not a court order. Children are only removed by police or a court order.

Lunde · 19/02/2026 13:59

SunsetValley · 19/02/2026 12:22

Sorry, I wanted to comment that that’s not entirely true, children can be removed fairly lightly whilst they conduct their investigation, particularly if they’re staying with other family members. Social work teams can be very lax, or very averse to risk.

We don’t know the circumstances surrounding Katie’s kids, but what I would say is her behaviour is very dysfunctional. I can’t imagine her sticking out through the court process to sort it out, and she hasn’t shown herself to be the most responsible in marrying this strange bloke after one week.

Show quote history

Yes they can be very lax especially in Katie's cases - one of the social workers who was supposed to be ensuring the kids' safety was actually friends with KP and became her employee after being sacked by the council.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12786865/Katie-Prices-social-worker-SACKED.html

Katie Price's social worker SACKED after getting 'too close' to star

Katie Price's social worker has been sacked for getting 'too close' to her amid concerns she was blurring professional boundaries, MailOnline can reveal.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12786865/Katie-Prices-social-worker-SACKED.html