I’m a scientist, currently in a chemistry-adjacent role but have worked in other sectors. In research AI and machine learning are big in some sectors - they’re allowing big leaps as links between datasets are being discovered that humans would have taken years to make, if at all. From a lab point of view, AI is starting to make inroads, but largely only as a talking point / selling point to non-sciencey managers. The big developments in labs are in full automation. Chemistry grads are already struggling to find jobs and that will make it worse, as automation takes over entry-level roles.
But you say she’s not as interested in chemistry - so my hope would be with physics and maths, that would lean her into new technologies. I’ve also seen a push into the nuclear industry, with lots of funding for research & focus on upskilling.
My eldest DC is currently doing GCSEs and is STEM-oriented. He’s considering physics, maths, computer science & I’m happy with those.
My point of view is that AI & automation is coming regardless - best to work with it, rather than against it. Instead of trying to find a career that’s “AI-proof”, find one that involves it, so you can pivot.
With physics & biology that could lead to biomechanics, for example.
Lastly, if I had a child capable of such things, I would be contemplating physics, comp Sci and either law or philosophy. I think AI ethics is a ticking time bomb that eventually will have to be addressed. There’s already an increased awareness of validation needs - eventually the question of “we can, but should we” will become impossible to ignore.