Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Mistakes in recently published fiction books

209 replies

Danascully2 · 23/11/2025 16:52

Has anyone else noticed poor proofreading in published books recently? I'm not talking about the finer details of colon vs semi colon etc but words in the wrong order, or in one case the same sentence twice in a paragraph (I'm confident it was an error rather than some sort of artistic choice). My 8 year old could have spotted them. I understand it's tricky to proofread a whole book but I presume it is somebody's job to do just that (editor?).
Or have mistakes always slipped through occasionally and it's just chance that I've had quite a few recently?

OP posts:
SmugglersHaunt · 25/11/2025 07:55

MyThreeWords · 25/11/2025 07:09

Can you put me out of my misery? I'm not seeing the error here.

(EDITED TO ADD: ... apart from the shockingly bad taste!)

Edited

Read the first line of the white text

BellissimoGecko · 25/11/2025 08:15

One of the reasons that there are errors in books is the shocking rate some publishers pay. I heard from an editor colleague the other day that a publisher had offered them £650 to edit a book of 350k words (not sure what kind of book, but that is massive. The average book is about 90k words).

That’s about 122 hours of work. For £650. So the hourly rate would be well below the NMW. She turned down the book, but I’m sure that someone new and desperate will take it on.

YourMotherSortsSocksInHell · 25/11/2025 08:15

@SlightTickle

But it’s not as though it’s Kevin Costner riding from Dover to Sherwood Forest via Hadrian’s Wall, or a major plotline involving someone running a successful mole catching business in Ireland.

Are there no moles in Ireland? I didn't know that. Did the snakes eat them all and that's why St Patrick drove them out

Mistakes in recently published fiction books

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

BellissimoGecko · 25/11/2025 08:16

AdjustingVideoFrameRate · 25/11/2025 02:45

To be fair the better small publishers do too (although the proofreader will often be freelance). Small publishers publish fewer books, so it’s more noticeable if one of their books has errors, and their reputation suffers.

Proofreaders are all freelance, even for the Big 5. I haven’t heard of an in-house proofreader for years.

Yes, small publishers do employ proofreaders but their rates are often insulting.

BellissimoGecko · 25/11/2025 08:19

SmugglersHaunt · 24/11/2025 19:10

It’s been going on for a while - this is the cover (the cover!!) of a book published about 20 years ago

Covers are often only proofread by in-house staff, not be a proofreader.

Also, it’s hard to see missing/extra letters that are long and thin - j, l, t, etc.

Colinfromaccounts · 25/11/2025 10:50

AdjustingVideoFrameRate · 25/11/2025 02:45

To be fair the better small publishers do too (although the proofreader will often be freelance). Small publishers publish fewer books, so it’s more noticeable if one of their books has errors, and their reputation suffers.

Literally every small publisher in the world uses proofreaders.

Porridgeandwhiskey · 25/11/2025 11:40

SlightTickle · 24/11/2025 12:36

I do think that some of what some posters are viewing as errors is just artistic licence. Richard Osman’s We Solve Murders has a Cork vineyard in the wrong location, but I don’t think that’s an error, any more than the Whitby motorway or the Tunbridge Wells Waitrose are, or the fact that there’s no popular Irish breakfast tv show — it’s just invented to suit the story.

What about Ireland AM? That’s quite popular.
There’s a vineyard in Kinsale…could that have been the one he was talking about?

Must read the book!😁

Suzyloo · 25/11/2025 12:35

I read a thriller in which the main character was in Trafalgar Square on Christmas Day surrounded by red buses. London buses don't run on Christmas Day.

Then there was a ridiculous historical novel in which a woman got on a boat in "London harbour" and ended up in Paris - technically possible, but it's not the way boats typically cross the Channel, and it took her no time at all. And she kept moving house but always had the same neighbours.

But law-related mistakes annoy me the most, because I used to be a lawyer. "Courthouse" in UK (or at least English) books is just wrong - no-one really says "I've just arrived at the courthouse". They might say "I've arrived at court" or "I'm standing outside the Crown Court" or "the court building" or just "the court" but not "courthouse". And in one very popular book, the characters were trying to challenge a wrongful conviction, and they found a barrister to take the case pro bono, which was fine, but she said she'd need to review the transcripts of the trial and they just appeared like magic. In real life, transcripts cost a fortune, and no young barrister acting pro bono would pay hundreds or thousands of pounds for the transcripts as well as reviewing them and drafting appeal documents.

RescueMeFromThisSilliness · 25/11/2025 16:13

SlightTickle · 24/11/2025 14:17

But that’s not an error. Some publishers will revise everything into US spellings and idioms for the US edition, and that may in some cases have been the basis for the Kindle edition, and sometimes some UK publishers will use US spellings and expressions for the sake of US sales. So Sally from Surbiton trips over the curb of the sidewalk because the laces of her sneakers come undone, falls and rips a hole in her pantyhose.

And that, needless to say, would be the point at which I'd hurl the cursed paperback in the bin.

HoppityBun · 25/11/2025 16:24

iSage · 24/11/2025 08:07

That reminds me of one of the Jennings books, where Jennings has written a short story about a detective, containing the lines: "As he looked round the room, his eye fell on a piece of paper. He bent down and picked it up." Darbishire is quick to point out the double-meaning.

I loved Jennings and Derbyshire. I still use the term “supersonic earsight” in the hope that another fan will recognise it.

EmpressaurusKitty · 25/11/2025 16:45

RescueMeFromThisSilliness · 25/11/2025 16:13

And that, needless to say, would be the point at which I'd hurl the cursed paperback in the bin.

Me too.

EmpressaurusKitty · 25/11/2025 16:50

HoppityBun · 25/11/2025 16:24

I loved Jennings and Derbyshire. I still use the term “supersonic earsight” in the hope that another fan will recognise it.

I love them too.

In the same chapter, there was the bit about ‘uninformed policemen’ & Darbishire wanted to know what they hadn’t been informed about, not realising it was a typo for uniformed.

saltandlineker · 25/11/2025 22:56

Fasterthan40 · 24/11/2025 09:47

I was very pleased that the new Robert Galbraith only had a couple that stood out to me. “Weak leak” instead of “weak link” being the more egregious. I went off Adele Parks over the last decade and part of that was the sheer volume of proof reading errors in her books. It was so annoying that I gave up on books. The wrong use of words seems quite common in lots of books now too.

I spotted 3 grammatical or spelling errors and I missed the one you found in the latest Strike. I flagged them all on my kindle so I might revisit the book to see if any have been corrected.

Fasterthan40 · 26/11/2025 06:39

saltandlineker · 25/11/2025 22:56

I spotted 3 grammatical or spelling errors and I missed the one you found in the latest Strike. I flagged them all on my kindle so I might revisit the book to see if any have been corrected.

I try hard not to notice tbh as I want to enjoy the book but that one sprung out at me (hardback not kindle so yours may have been corrected).
Just remembered an even more egregious error in an American crime novel I read on holiday this year. Evil and intricate murderous plotting by a teen who resented having been born with foetal alcohol syndrome. So he resolved to punish his parents for partying too hard. I wondered if I had completely misunderstood the condition but concluded it was the author’s absolute lack of research and not my lack of knowledge.

HierarchyOfMugs · 26/11/2025 10:41

This is neither fiction nor a book, but I think it's relevant to this thread anyway. Fairly typical error in a Times online article. There's something like this most days. Sloppy.

Mistakes in recently published fiction books
cheapskatemum · 26/11/2025 11:37

Pharazon · 24/11/2025 09:17

@brushingboots I think a lot of these completely egregious errors are common when you have authors who write about places they are not from. American-written novels set in the UK are typically full of anachronisms and cultural and geographic errors, and I suspect British authors setting their novels abroad also make exactly the same kind of errors, however we generally won’t notice unless we are very familiar with the foreign setting.

It even happens in fantasy where authors will build an entire worldscape rooted in Medieval Europe and then have their characters breakfast on blueberry pancakes.

I quite often notice that books set in the UK in the 50s, 60s & 70s & even the 40s, have people, for example working class families, ubiquitously drinking wine with their dinner. I don’t think my family was different to many others. I remember Blue Nun and Mateus Rosé being a very special, rare treat from the late 70s onwards.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 26/11/2025 11:46

Danascully2 · 23/11/2025 17:31

Ah that's a whole other area of mistakes, I was thinking more of the 'typo' sort of issue (but quite obvious ones).
On those lines I was a bit frustrated recently about a book which overall I enjoyed but which had a long section based around someone getting a sleeper train from King's Cross to Yorkshire. I might be wrong but as quite a regular train user I am fairly sure there are no sleeper trains to Yorkshire (apart from anything else it only takes a train about 2 hours from kings cross to York....).

Yes oak tree leaves in snow would be annoying although I might easily have missed that. It's always fun looking out for the inappropriately lush foliage on the bake off Christmas specials which must be filmed in the summer but I understand they can't do much about that on TV! (Sorry for the spoiler for anyone who hadn't noticed).

That makes sense that there aren't proofreaders anymore, that would explain the typo sort of errors. I don't really know anything about the publishing process.

Was that JK Rowling in a Strike book? That really pissed me off. Huge part of the plot hinging on how she would possibly make a sleeper train to Yorkshire as if it was all the way to Aberdeen. And also "ooooohhh, noooooo, how will I find transport" - when she's sitting in a hire car. And in a later book, Strike taking the sleeper to Edinburgh at what must have been an immensely inflated price compared to flying yet whinging about being poor.

I call this billionaire writing though. It's not her fault she's so out of touch that she creates plot points around entirely the wrong things money-wise.

Danascully2 · 26/11/2025 14:07

Yes if it had been mentioned in passing it wouldn't have mattered but as you say there was a whole section revolving around the sleeper train. It was also left unexplained what Strike had done with the hire car (Though there was a mention that it was expensive...).

No spoilers about the rest of the Strike books please as I've only read the first two and am at the mercy of the reservation system at the library for when I might get the next one.

OP posts:
TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 26/11/2025 14:35

Danascully2 · 26/11/2025 14:07

Yes if it had been mentioned in passing it wouldn't have mattered but as you say there was a whole section revolving around the sleeper train. It was also left unexplained what Strike had done with the hire car (Though there was a mention that it was expensive...).

No spoilers about the rest of the Strike books please as I've only read the first two and am at the mercy of the reservation system at the library for when I might get the next one.

Haha, I will keep it limited to the bloody Edinburgh sleeper! I stopped reading because they stopped editing the books, ironically - they can hardly justify a lack of editing on a guaranteed best seller.

But I think it's Rowling going, "fuck you, no one edits JKR". Fair play if it's what she wants, but it made the latter books increasingly turgid and unreadable IMO.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 26/11/2025 14:37

Danascully2 · 26/11/2025 14:07

Yes if it had been mentioned in passing it wouldn't have mattered but as you say there was a whole section revolving around the sleeper train. It was also left unexplained what Strike had done with the hire car (Though there was a mention that it was expensive...).

No spoilers about the rest of the Strike books please as I've only read the first two and am at the mercy of the reservation system at the library for when I might get the next one.

Oh, and I figured the hire car got towed and he had to pay the fines? It just really annoyed me that she kept banging on about them being soooooo resourceful and Robin is such a good driver, but it doesn't occur to either of them to use the vehicle they're literally already in to drive to Yorkshire. Which wouldn't probably have cost more than ditching the car in the middle of London for a sleeper train that doesn't exist (I checked!).

Parsleyforme · 26/11/2025 14:43

I didn't know you could flag things up on a Kindle, that's a great feature.
It's rare that I read a book that doesn't have an error in but it's usually just one word. I do sometimes wonder if they get corrected between editions. It's easy now to send an email instead of sending a letter to the publisher/author so maybe they do more than they used to. I know books are long, but there's a lot of automatic grammar/sense software available

FuckRealityBringMeABook · 26/11/2025 15:22

I read a non-fiction book on Africa which had the Nile flowing into Lake Victoria in the very first line.

RescueMeFromThisSilliness · 26/11/2025 15:42

cheapskatemum · 26/11/2025 11:37

I quite often notice that books set in the UK in the 50s, 60s & 70s & even the 40s, have people, for example working class families, ubiquitously drinking wine with their dinner. I don’t think my family was different to many others. I remember Blue Nun and Mateus Rosé being a very special, rare treat from the late 70s onwards.

I agree, For most ordinary people, drinking at home was something they simply didn't do all year round. The housekeeping money didn't stretch to luxuries like that. They'd buy a bottle or two at Christmas and that was it. My late dad sometimes got a bottle of scotch from work, and he'd make it last all year.

HonoriaBulstrode · 26/11/2025 16:34

I quite often notice that books set in the UK in the 50s, 60s & 70s & even the 40s, have people, for example working class families, ubiquitously drinking wine with their dinner.

And characters being informal in a way that just wouldn't have happened. Even in my first job in the 1970s, the manager addressed all the women as Mrs or Miss Surname.

StripedPillowcase · 27/11/2025 10:25

@HonoriaBulstrode

And characters being informal in a way that just wouldn't have happened. Even in my first job in the 1970s, the manager addressed all the women as Mrs or Miss Surname.

My DGM referred to her friends as Mrs X and Miss Y til the day she died (in the mid 1990s).