Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Books for someone with development delay

29 replies

Linenpickle · 17/11/2025 17:10

I’m participating in a scheme where you buy Christmas gifts for kids who are sick/ill for all sorts of reasons - Post Pals. I’ve chosen to get books for a girl aged 18 who has development delay. That is all I know aside from the subject but can anyone help as to what sort of age range I should go for?

OP posts:
Carandache18 · 18/11/2025 16:14

There is a publisher called Barrington Stoke, who publish for readers with difficulties, such as dyslexia, developmental delay etc. The fornt is clear, they are always illustrated, the paper is coloured and the reading ages adjusted. So for example, you might find characters aged 16, but the book written for a reading age of 8. They have a huge, very high quality range.
Here's a link: https://collins.co.uk/pages/barrington-stoke

Discover Barrington Stoke Books | Dyslexia Friendly Books for Children

The official home of Barrington Stoke: award-winning, accessible books that inspire a love of reading. Find the perfect story for every child's ability and interest. Browse books now!

https://collins.co.uk/pages/barrington-stoke

CremeEggsForBreakfast · 19/11/2025 18:19

Christmasisaroundthecorner · 18/11/2025 08:16

That’s interesting. I guess I’m thinking that developmental delay as a descriptor is shorthand for global developmental delay, and often used about people who would previously have been described as having at least moderate to severe learning difficulties. It would be highly unlikely to be used for a child with a specific (eg dyslexia) rather than broader learning difficulty.

I think the cognitive resources needed for understanding most Roald Dahl is pretty high (barring perhaps The Twits). And also, most kids for whom Dahl would be suitable would probably already have read them by 18. Interpreting line drawings is also harder whereas colour helps.
I think Beatrix Potter might look young to an 18 year old who wants to feel grown up, and the language is not as simple as the books look, language levels in Anne of GG and Narnia also high, much as I love all of these. (I’ve taught in mainstream and special schools, and also thinking of families I know with young people with significant cognitive impairment; for various reasons relating to disability it’s pretty common to be in on a Saturday night watching something like Strictly.

So, again, if OP can’t find more info, I’d recommend perhaps annuals covering a few topics as they don’t look too young, can be enjoyed at various levels and as they are newly published the young woman is less likely to already have them.

Edited

This is such an odd take for a special needs teacher. Why would having developmental delays mean a child loses their right to interests and preferences? Because annuals really are related to very specific interests. If she doesn't watch Strictly then what use is an annual to her? Something like The Beano might just be interesting in isolation but she won't have any investment in the characters or understanding of their plot lines.

Yes, the language in Narnia and the like are trickier but isn't that the point of reading? I think I saw that this young person is reading at the age of about 5 or 6 years so while she may struggle to read it herself, I think she's more likely to enjoy hearing it read aloud than she is to enjoy a random annual on a hobby or TV programme she doesn't know.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Christmasisaroundthecorner · 19/11/2025 20:51

CremeEggsForBreakfast · 19/11/2025 18:19

This is such an odd take for a special needs teacher. Why would having developmental delays mean a child loses their right to interests and preferences? Because annuals really are related to very specific interests. If she doesn't watch Strictly then what use is an annual to her? Something like The Beano might just be interesting in isolation but she won't have any investment in the characters or understanding of their plot lines.

Yes, the language in Narnia and the like are trickier but isn't that the point of reading? I think I saw that this young person is reading at the age of about 5 or 6 years so while she may struggle to read it herself, I think she's more likely to enjoy hearing it read aloud than she is to enjoy a random annual on a hobby or TV programme she doesn't know.

I said ‘in the absence of further information’ ‘annuals covering a few topics’ might be suitable. I was thinking that if you got a few with a range of topics hopefully one or more would be of interest. Sorry that my implication there wasn’t sufficiently explicit. Of course I think that people with developmental delay have a right to their own interests and that this right should be respected! It’s just that there wasn’t any info about what these interests were.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page