DH and I each work 4 months of the year in servitude to HMRC. Not quite as bad as that poster, but still too much.
I was actually thinking about medieval serfs recently, and how we find it incredible that they worked for their Lords for free, and never questioned it because it was 'natural' and 'the way things are'.
A male serf worked 150 days for free, and in return they got their house, land to work, and the same kind of state services as we get, within the context of the time: defence from invaders, the rule of law, and medical help, such as it existed.
Female serfs had to hand over some of their productivity too, in the form of woven cloth.
DH and I only work 60 days for free, but we don't get a house or land.
1.Rent on a small 2-bed house in my area (ie equivalent to what a serf would have been given) would take another 40 days of our work - 20 days each. (we choose to pay more than that for a bigger house - but I count that extra cost against the part of our income we get to keep 'for us')
2.I suppose the equivalent of land is a working environment that allows us to be productive - but it isn't the government that provides that so it doesn't come out of my taxes. Its my employer - who takes their own (justifiable) cut of my productivity in return for that. Estimate their cut is about 10%? 23 days each.
103 days each (206 days total) for tax, basic housing and the means to be able to work really doesn't compare very well with the 150 days a serf had to work for the same.
And we think the UK is past it's feudal stage. That things are better now. Not for those of us forced to work free to support those who don't want to! It's just a different type of tyranny.