Lots of threads at the moment about budgets, tax rises, changes to pensions, benefit cuts etc.
Without getting into the detail of what should be raised or cut can the UK ACTUALLY go bankrupt?
My understanding is that because we have our own currency we technically can't as we can just print more money. However this leads to it's own set of problems and is not really desirable. (Also if we can do this then why did we need an IMF bailout in the seventies?)
So if RR and KS do their budget but just tinker about with it and do nothing radical then what will happen.
I mean they might raise a bit of extra cash on some things but if they keep spending the way they are then without substantial extra cash coming in via taxes or growth, the debt will keep getting bigger.
There just seems to be lots of things all coming together to create a big 'bang' at the moment. Taxes seem to be almost maxed at or even falling. They seem to have stalled growth with some of the things they did last year (lots of threads giving the impression jobs are hard to come by just now). Costs seem to be going up and up. Last but not least the worse the situation gets the worse our interest seems to get (on bonds).
So what would happen if next month they couldn't borrow enough to make it all work. I mean isn't it a terribly risky way to run a country being reliant on having to borrow each month to pay your bills.
We all seem to think the idea of having no NHS or welfare state is unthinkable. Britain used to operate just like this. If you could pay you got a doctor, if you couldn't you didn't. If you were so poor you couldn't survive and had nobody to help you went to the workhouse (my mum was born at start of WW2 and used to talk about this).
Surely if we keep going till it blows up this is exactly what we are going back to?
There are lots of threads arguing about which benefits should be cut or which taxes should be raised but since we all seem to be agreed that RR/KS aren't capable of fixing things then what happens when it goes bang?
Do we get an IMF bailout with conditions imposed (so NHS, welfare all slashed?) or do we print more money (in which case why didn't we do this in the seventies when we got the last IMF bailout?). Presumably printing money signals huge problems in the UK which in turn makes our bonds harder to sell and more interest on them. Surely investors would just stop buying them?
Please no arguing about disabled children in the gutter or pensioners freezing to death.
Just at the highest level what actually happens?
(Thread inspired by watching podcast with someone high up in IMF who was saying debt to GDP concerning and alot of things that sounded worrying)
In the past we sold off industries and got cash inflow. We sold off gold and got cash inflow. We printed money and got cash inflow. It does seem however the world is watching the UK at the moment quite carefully and alot hinges on the budget and I don't think we have anything left to sell now do we?
So at the very top, the UK as a whole, what happens?