Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor : Why did the Queen protect him & was she complicit?

324 replies

SpottyAardvark · 31/10/2025 09:34

Queen Elizabeth was very well aware of the seriousness of the allegations against Andrew, and of the testimony of his victim. She very likely knew there were more allegations against him by more victims. Yet she still protected him. She refused to take any action, other than bailing him out by paying paid out millions of pounds to settle legal claims against him by his victim.

Queen Elizabeth was part of the culture of denial & cover-up of serious crimes. Is this a serious stain on her reputation as monarch, and should there now be an enquiry into what she knew, and when, before we start putting up statues to this woman?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ginasevern · 03/11/2025 15:58

ShenandoahRiver · 02/11/2025 19:12

@ginasevern
Her own father and grandmother sold Diana down the river. Wasn't just the RF.

Very true. She didn't stand a chance. I wouldn't marry my daughter into the RF if it they possessed the last man on earth.

FluentOP · 04/11/2025 13:11

BeeWitchy · 03/11/2025 05:52

“It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. Any claim to the contrary is false and without foundation".”

That’s the statement made by Buckingham Palace 3rd December 2019.

The Queen was still alive, and still making decisions apparently. Not good ones, I fear.

Poor Virginia to be so publicly called a liar by Queen Elizabeth 2.

I’ve just watched the Australian program - 60 Minutes. Titled “could this be the end for Andrew, the former Prince?” and it is compelling. Andrew Lownie, Dai Davis, Emily Maitlis are all interviewed. The most compelling interview though is Virginia Guiffre. She was recorded back in 2019. I Believe Every Single Word She Says. Who is not compelling? Andrew.

I don’t think they come any braver than Virginia Guiffre. And I don’t think they come any more cowardly than Andrew, and also that goes for anyone in the royal family that may have known what went on and sat on their knowledge.

Edited

Agree, totally. The royal family are despicable.

HellsBellsAndCatsWhiskers · 06/11/2025 09:55

I've not followed the situation in great detail. Has he ever been found guilty of anything or is it still at the accusations stage? If the latter, then shes not really going to throw her son under the bus for accusations.

ShenandoahRiver · 06/11/2025 10:03

KC appears to think differently. TLQ paid off Virgina Guiffre to the tune of £12m.

Pedallleur · 06/11/2025 10:06

HellsBellsAndCatsWhiskers · 06/11/2025 09:55

I've not followed the situation in great detail. Has he ever been found guilty of anything or is it still at the accusations stage? If the latter, then shes not really going to throw her son under the bus for accusations.

paid out of court settlemnt ($12 million) but admitted no guilt. It was NEVER going to a case in a US Courtroom

notimagain · 06/11/2025 10:26

WaryHiker · 03/11/2025 15:11

I was referring to the second half of your sentence, not the first. He didn't make Vice Admiral on merit.

"Bright enough to fly helicopters, and have a high position in the Navy!"

As far as his service career goes whilst it's widley acknowledged he wasn"t a plesant individual at all he does seem to have jumped through all the hoops etc required to hold down as I understand it the rank of commander.

That's senior officer level but quite near the bottom, below captain (naval version thereof) and well below the various Admiral tiers.

It's promotions after leaving that that are definitely honorary, the Royal involved then usually moves up in (honorary) rank in step with the fast movers in his/her cohort who have stayed in the relevant service.

SheilaFentiman · 06/11/2025 13:30

I don't believe the amount of the out of court settlement was ever confirmed, though various newspapers have speculated. My understanding is that TLQ donated £2m to a domestic abuse charity as part of the agreement, but again, don't know if that is official.

It also seems to be quite unusual in that the NDA that went with it seems to have been time limited and didn't prevent the publication of the book.

Pepperlee · 06/11/2025 15:27

Sterlingrose · 01/11/2025 17:01

She did a fantastic job... at a job that we don't need. I'll speak ill of the dead if i want, i used to say it when she was alive and i don't think i owe her any respect, dead or not. She was just a woman like any other, just with a lot more money.

We don't need a monarchy. We didn't need the queen. We don't need Charles or any of the other hangers on. We don't need to pay millions of pounds to these people because of nothing more than an accident of birth.

And i agree with @CurlewKate . You cant demand other people respect the royals just because you do.

Do you know what changed my mind on the royals from "meh" to disgust?

Paying to go on a tour of Buckingham Palace and seeing it absolutely stuffed to the brim with treasure, and know there are plenty of other properties across the country that are also filled with their treasure, while just outside the door, a stones throw away, are children in abject poverty. It's sickening.

And then good old queenie goes and pays £12 million to a woman her gross son says he never met. Yeah. Right. Totally innocent though? Not at all complicit?

Agree with your disgust at the amount of valuables in Buckingham Palace because I feel the same disgust at the vast wealth of the Church of England and the Vatican when these are supposed to be the Christians. On a smaller scale I despise multi millionaires asking us to dig deep to help their sponsored charities. Thing is none of us would feel any benefit if all their worldly goods were flogged off.

FuckRealityBringMeABook · 06/11/2025 17:27

ginasevern · 03/11/2025 15:58

Very true. She didn't stand a chance. I wouldn't marry my daughter into the RF if it they possessed the last man on earth.

Imagine deliberately signing your kids up to live like that

RainbowBagels · 06/11/2025 18:54

FuckRealityBringMeABook · 06/11/2025 17:27

Imagine deliberately signing your kids up to live like that

I think many Aristo families, especially 40 years ago still thought they lived in the era of the Tudor court. It's all about ingratiating yourself with The Crown. Diana was a 3rd daughter too, so completely disposable for any other purpose.

SheilaFentiman · 06/11/2025 18:56

Was Diana herself against the marriage at the time, though? I never got that impression

Imaginethatifyoucan · 06/11/2025 19:02

SheilaFentiman · 06/11/2025 18:56

Was Diana herself against the marriage at the time, though? I never got that impression

Of course she wasn’t. If she had been forced into it she certainly would have said so later when she unburdened herself about every other thing. She did say she was having second thoughts in the days beforehand and her sisters said it was too late to back out, but that isn’t the same thing.

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:08

Pedallleur · 01/11/2025 09:09

They are Honorary medals and sort of come with the job. An internet search will probably tell you more. There will be a hierarchy of medals from Order of the Garter down thro various military awards.

Edited

So just badges then (not earned - just for show).

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:26

ginasevern · 01/11/2025 16:05

@SecretSantaz "I think this is in bad taste. Overall, the late Queen didn't put much of a foot wrong. We don't know what she knew and what she didn't. Maybe she was protected from much of it by the courtiers and her family."

It's quite sad how deluded and swayed by propoganda the general public seems to be. It never ceases to amaze me in this day and age. The Queen had a extraordinarily firm grip on everything that went on around her, especially in matters of the "The Firm". This is the woman who personally had 123 laws changed in her and her family's favour including employment rights, animal welfare, environmental issues and finance. The idea that she was some sort of sweet, simple soul is absolutely laughable. Her main objective, and that of all members of the RF, is to protect their literally unfathomable wealth and privilege at all costs. However, the net is closing in as we gradually peel away from the hitherto 1950's mindset of blind and slavish devotion. Andrew will only be the tip of the iceberg.

She was squirrelling money away into offshore accounts

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/05/revealed-queen-private-estate-invested-offshore-paradise-papers

The duchy money belongs to the Nation.

Revealed: Queen's private estate invested millions of pounds offshore

Paradise Papers reveal Duchy of Lancaster invested in retailer criticised for exploiting thousands of poor families

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/05/revealed-queen-private-estate-invested-offshore-paradise-papers

tempname1234 · 06/11/2025 19:27

The queen was also his mother. He her favourite child. Andrew likely spun a story and like any mum, the queen, would be prone to want to believe her child.

It is also a family that has many salacious rumours spun in tabloids. So was reasonable to take the stance she did.

keep in mind, the information we have today is not the information we (and the queen) were privy to.

Pedallleur · 06/11/2025 19:28

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:08

So just badges then (not earned - just for show).

Does have the Falklands service and poss something else from his helicopter days but the others are part of the job with his HRH style and any honorary military association eg The Guards. Phillip was Colonel in Chief of a Guards Regiment but I think Andrew got refused due to his publicity.

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:35

billysboy · 01/11/2025 17:19

Surely the personal protection officers have some responsibility as they must have known what was going on

Yes it will be interesting to see who they told and what was done about it (covered up). I hope there will be a full investigation.

ginasevern · 06/11/2025 19:39

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:26

She was squirrelling money away into offshore accounts

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/05/revealed-queen-private-estate-invested-offshore-paradise-papers

The duchy money belongs to the Nation.

Yep, the RF is the definitive model of self preservation and the Queen was actually one of the worst of the bunch. Their wealth amounts to waaay more than the public are led to believe - and that's bad enough.

Aethelredtheunsteady · 06/11/2025 20:12

ginasevern · 06/11/2025 19:39

Yep, the RF is the definitive model of self preservation and the Queen was actually one of the worst of the bunch. Their wealth amounts to waaay more than the public are led to believe - and that's bad enough.

Highly recommend Norman Baker’s ‘And what do you do’ or Graham Smith’s ‘Abolish the Monarchy’ for anyone interested in learning more about Royal finances and all the other myths that get peddled (tourism, the utility of them as patrons, that they don’t have any influence on government etc).

ginasevern · 06/11/2025 20:23

Aethelredtheunsteady · 06/11/2025 20:12

Highly recommend Norman Baker’s ‘And what do you do’ or Graham Smith’s ‘Abolish the Monarchy’ for anyone interested in learning more about Royal finances and all the other myths that get peddled (tourism, the utility of them as patrons, that they don’t have any influence on government etc).

Yes, read them and also recommend. Personally I think both should be compulsory reading in schools.

BeeWitchy · 06/11/2025 21:05

FluentOP · 06/11/2025 19:08

So just badges then (not earned - just for show).

I do laugh when they give each other medals and ribbons. .

It’s like playing dress up for adults.

“Here Son, for having been born my son, and been my son now for 30 years, you get this medal.”

“Here daughter in law, you get this medal for being my husband’s wife for 20 years, well done you.”

It is all a little bit mad.

BeeWitchy · 06/11/2025 21:17

“Last month, the German magazine Der Spiegel said it had found state papers documenting how the queen had asked for two horses as a gift while on a state visit to West Germany in 1978. The country’s president approved the gift in the interests of good relations, despite it being the most expensive gift given to a visiting head of state since the end of the second world war.”

In regard to the grift, Andrew has grown up with it. Seen it all his life.

Royals made almost £2m from sale of horses received as gifts from prominent figures

Palace insists horses given to late queen, including 34 from emir of Dubai, were ‘personal gifts’

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/07/royals-made-almost-2m-from-sale-of-horses-received-as-gifts-from-prominent-figures

Allseeingallknowing · 06/11/2025 21:27

Aethelredtheunsteady · 06/11/2025 20:12

Highly recommend Norman Baker’s ‘And what do you do’ or Graham Smith’s ‘Abolish the Monarchy’ for anyone interested in learning more about Royal finances and all the other myths that get peddled (tourism, the utility of them as patrons, that they don’t have any influence on government etc).

Agree. Norman Baker’s book is a real eye opener!

RainbowBagels · 06/11/2025 21:33

BeeWitchy · 06/11/2025 21:05

I do laugh when they give each other medals and ribbons. .

It’s like playing dress up for adults.

“Here Son, for having been born my son, and been my son now for 30 years, you get this medal.”

“Here daughter in law, you get this medal for being my husband’s wife for 20 years, well done you.”

It is all a little bit mad.

To be fair, a medal for lasting 20 years beginning treated like a painted doll and brood mare for the RF seems like small compensation!

Swipe left for the next trending thread