Flawless I am having this argument with my LA. My chikd is starting eotas, that has been agreed still arguing security in section F. Partly because I am saying they must provide the adult required for safeguarding
My child is actuslly gave 2 sdults/tutors due to his profile of needs, this is at home 3hrs 3 timesa week. Aiming to add in another provider for another 8 hours.. and forest school one day.
But even WITH their being 2 adults the LA are insisting there must be "a responsible adult" in the home whikst tutoring/education takes place at home. I am a solo parent so it effectively means I cant work, cant leave the house.
I have a stage 2 complaint open with LA over this. And tribunal (cancelled 2 days before it was due as the LA failed to submit working document...) is now next spring. I have stated in want ALL provision for the eotas package to be specified including resources ie equipment and staff for supervision.
I have got lots specified but some things they are refusing saying it doesn't need to be specified. No reason just refusing.
I am hoping I can get it at tribunal saying that children and families act makes LA responsible, send code of practice states specified, clear and unambiguous and imo the Equality act means requiring me to supervise is indirect disability discrimination.
Have been trying to find case law to back me up, if you know any relevant stuff I would be grateful for links!
Op sorry for derail the dchool should have a medical needs policy and they and the LA shoukd be working together to ensure supoort. Your updates make it sound like EHCPs may be wiryg pursuing as he clearly has SEMH needs related to his physical needs and he needs support for all of it to enable him to access his education.
Keep everything is email everyone they phone I would be emailing and say as per phone call today... when he goes home are they marking this as authorised, unauthorised, illness etc. I would find out. He needs a medical care plan.