Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

America and the threat to global health - what happens next?

31 replies

somethingnewandexciting · 28/08/2025 11:41

I see Trump has fired the head of the CDC because she won't sign off on non-scientific waffle and is therefore "not aligned" with Trump's vision for American health. My worry, as we saw with Covid, is how quickly communicable diseases can spread across the world. I read last month America had a case of the plague, yesterday it was flesh eating screw worms... At what point do we start quarantining people from countries with dubious healthcare practices? Am I the only one worrying about this?

OP posts:
somethingnewandexciting · 28/08/2025 14:33

Yes I agree measles is a more immediate issue, especially since anti-vaxxing went crazy here too via social media and now so many kids are at risk because they aren't protected. So yes that will likely be what we see first affecting us. Again though, we at least have free healthcare.

I mentioned the worst case scenario's because I can see a time when they become more rampant if US healthcare trajectory doesn't change. Densely populated areas like American cities with big tourism and business links could spread these very quickly around the globe. It leaves them very vulnerable to bio security threats too.

OP posts:
BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 28/08/2025 15:30

Rallentanda · 28/08/2025 14:30

It's easy to read a headline and know nothing of the history or of the norms. The US has always had forms of plague, but they aren't spread person to person, they tend to come from contact with wild animals.

What's happening with monitoring is an absolute disaster, global-healthcare-wise.

And to whoever said "there are far worse countries than the US for healthcare', that's much less true than you think. The US has a cohort of people with excellent healthcare, and a massive number of people with next to none. 100% a symptom of the commercialisation of healthcare that they cling to.

I'm honestly not interested in plague but if you ask about HIV or mpox then people at the top are saying those are going to be the next most troublesome diseases, simply because there is no longer much monitoring or reporting of cases and they take intensive involvement in communities to keep at low levels.

Much as I hate the decisions being made by this administration, the plague thing is a non-story. Plague still exists as a vector-borne disease in many parts of the world, including the US. The concern is human-human transmission of the most serious type (pneumonic) and there hasn't been a case of that for a long time (the 20's was the last recorded case in the US). Plague is just a headline grabber because it's scary.

Firearms represent a much bigger immediate public health risk in America than plague or measles (though obviously it's a huge worry that a vaccine preventable disease that has been eradicated is back).

publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/guns-remain-leading-cause-of-death-for-children-and-teens

RingoJuice · 28/08/2025 16:50

BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 28/08/2025 15:30

Much as I hate the decisions being made by this administration, the plague thing is a non-story. Plague still exists as a vector-borne disease in many parts of the world, including the US. The concern is human-human transmission of the most serious type (pneumonic) and there hasn't been a case of that for a long time (the 20's was the last recorded case in the US). Plague is just a headline grabber because it's scary.

Firearms represent a much bigger immediate public health risk in America than plague or measles (though obviously it's a huge worry that a vaccine preventable disease that has been eradicated is back).

publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/guns-remain-leading-cause-of-death-for-children-and-teens

Yeah like we’ll never get rid of rabies, plague, hanta virus, etc because our wildlife will always carry it. Couple of people annually die of rabies, mostly from bats

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Newbutoldfather · 28/08/2025 17:13

@somethingnewandexciting ,

‘Yes but now they are slashing budgets and departments in epidemiology and going away from the proven methods, we can't trust them to monitor outbreaks. Which is why it's more of a worry because they may not even know there is an epidemic until they've spread it all over and abroad.’

Seriously?!

I suspect even with the cuts, the U.S still spends more on disease monitoring per capita than 95% of the World.

The CDC is the top of a monitoring pyramid that starts at hospital and doctor level and is also done at state level.

Are you proposing we quarantine people from 95% of the world? And for how long, and where?

Even at the height of various epidemics, we have only quarantined people with active disease. And you want to quarantine people just because you don’t like the health policies,!

Vaccines are another issue. A lot of the world still requires evidence of a yellow fever vaccine. Can you imagine the outcry if people in the U.K. were refused entry (or quarantined) in the U.S without evidence of a measles vaccine?

somethingnewandexciting · 28/08/2025 17:51

Newbutoldfather · 28/08/2025 17:13

@somethingnewandexciting ,

‘Yes but now they are slashing budgets and departments in epidemiology and going away from the proven methods, we can't trust them to monitor outbreaks. Which is why it's more of a worry because they may not even know there is an epidemic until they've spread it all over and abroad.’

Seriously?!

I suspect even with the cuts, the U.S still spends more on disease monitoring per capita than 95% of the World.

The CDC is the top of a monitoring pyramid that starts at hospital and doctor level and is also done at state level.

Are you proposing we quarantine people from 95% of the world? And for how long, and where?

Even at the height of various epidemics, we have only quarantined people with active disease. And you want to quarantine people just because you don’t like the health policies,!

Vaccines are another issue. A lot of the world still requires evidence of a yellow fever vaccine. Can you imagine the outcry if people in the U.K. were refused entry (or quarantined) in the U.S without evidence of a measles vaccine?

If they aren't tracing disease or curing it, yes. They will become a danger to global health largely because they are a nation that can afford to travel, in many cases before becoming symptomatic even. If we don't know what they have because they lack the basic structure of healthcare - CDC not fit for purpose - they are not on the same page as the rest of the world and become an active threat as incubators of disease.

OP posts:
somethingnewandexciting · 28/08/2025 17:59

I'm not alone in worrying, it turns out:

America is threat to global health due to not recognising science's importance in healthcare https://www.bmj.com/content/390/bmj.r1692/rr

https://www.yahoo.com/news/epidemiologist-flags-dangers-donald-trump-091239053.html - global stage

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/health/trump-state-health-grants-cuts.html - in US state health budget cuts

Trump doesn't want to be monitored on global standards https://thedoctor.bma.org.uk/articles/health-society/incredibly-alarming-trumps-usa-steps-away-from-global-health-role/ so effectively encouraging disease in other countries which will end up unchecked in America where they won't track it.

From Medieval Obscurantism to the Darkness of Trump’s America Against Science

https://www.bmj.com/content/390/bmj.r1692/rr

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page