I guess it’s addressing value of the day at school and productivity above presenteeism. I see enforced infection, with some long term implications (or even just an excessive amount of working with low level illnesses) as an unnecessary barrier to that.
Improved public awareness of long term impacts of illness e.g. long covid in children, even if asymptomatic. (DfE and a number of other bodies were going to highlight ways it presents in children to schools, but nothing actually happened). Consider the impact of illnesses on e.g. children with asthma, how it will mean more recurrent chest infections for others, or ear infections/hearing loss for others, how some illnesses make you more susceptible to other illnesses and infections, impact of trying to fight off too many viruses at one time, removing some of the myths about immunity etc. A secondary impact is illnesses picked up at school aren’t just limited to term time, which means some kids aren’t getting a real break for months.
Recognising that for some children, whether they have a physical or mental illness, it’s a marathon and not a sprint. Pushing too hard for fuller attendance can mean increasing health issues - a poor outcome for school and the families.
Considering impacts of high levels of illness on overall class absence, on results, on health, on families.
Children and teachers with contagious illnesses such as covid should not be in school, even if they feel ok.
Air quality in classrooms could be improved - with ventilation and cheap plug in HEPA filters to help with reducing spread inc. asymptomatic illness (and help children with asthma, improved results, cost offset by lower illness levels in teachers requiring fewer supply teacher days)
Remove practices such as child going home after registration because they are ill, but tick the attendance box.
Reduce things like whole school assemblies when there are a lot of viruses around.
An extra short break in the morning - good for kids and a chance to air classroom out.
Obviously with these measures, there will still be illness in schools, but I don’t think we need to encourage such high levels of viruses in schools or dismiss the short and longer term impacts of them.
Obviously illness in schools doesn’t stop there as kids don’t live alone. It costs so much in productivity loss in the workplace (from people who attend when ill), why would schools be different?
It’s about acknowledging there will be illness in schools, but trying to reduce the impacts and prevalence. The lion’s share of absence is due to illness, and depending on school, some won’t even authorise illness.
Blimey, I’ve gone on a bit especially for a lighthearted thread, but hope you get the gist!!