Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Over 70s to face driving ban...

328 replies

FridgeJenga · 11/08/2025 10:35

if they fail mandatory eye tests.

What's your opinion?
Is 70 too "young", or about right?
Would 75 be a better compromise?
Currently there is no legal age at which you must surrender your driving licence.
Both my father and FIL voluntarily gave up their licences just before they turned 80. My mum at 76, and MIL is still driving at 78, though only very locally.

(Also in the same article, drink driving limits are under discussion to be lowered, in line with Scotland's laws. This one I fully agree with)

OP posts:
UnemployedNotRetired · 11/08/2025 12:31

The evidence is really clear that it's over 75s who are the issue, see chart below [chart 1 at Reported road casualties in Great Britain: older driver factsheet, 2023 - GOV.UK].

JudgeJ · 11/08/2025 12:32

frozendaisy · 11/08/2025 10:39

They are only proposing testing eyesight, which is essential for safe driving.

So don’t see a problem really.

Every driver should have to pass eyesight tests on a regular basis. We don't tolerate drink impairing driving so maybe we should also ban those who are found with drugs in their bodies.

blondiepigtails · 11/08/2025 12:33

Thank god for that. Way over due. My dad is late 80s but he's very conscious of his eyesight and goes yearly to make sure he passes a sight test for driving. I have too many friends who worry about elderly parents driving.
This should've happened years ago

MyDeftDuck · 11/08/2025 12:33

“MIL is still driving at 78, though only very locally” …….. the problem with local driving is that people become complacent, because they think they “know the route - there’s never a vehicle coming out of that junction - know every bend in the road………etc etc” but that can go horrible wrong all too often. Driver need to remain alert and focussed on familiar routes just the same as motorway routes.

mrsneville · 11/08/2025 12:34

Eyesight deteriorates with age. Good eyesight is also important for operating a vehicle. So no, I don't think it's unreasonable.

LongGinShortTonic · 11/08/2025 12:37

I'd be delighted if something happened legislatively that stopped my mother driving. She has eye tests every two years, but the problem isn't her sight, it's her reaction times. I've not let the kids get in the car with her for three years now, I've reported her, and so have two other people I know of.

Nothing has happened. It worries me incessantly. Plus the roads are so much busier now, and she gets tired.

My father gave up his license 4 years ago after a minor accident sparked by a medical incident, this year he had a pacemaker fitted and at the age of 86 they told him he could get his drivers license back, just had to fill in a form! Unbelievable.

Saucery · 11/08/2025 12:37

PollysPocketss · 11/08/2025 12:30

Wear glasses?

The standard really is surprisingly low. Even corrected with glasses. I don’t think a lot of people realise this. I didn’t, until recently.

JudgeJ · 11/08/2025 12:38

Pedallleur · 11/08/2025 11:28

I'm fine with it also revising the drink/drive limit

Drug testing too, alcohol isn't the only drug.

MrsSlocombesCat · 11/08/2025 12:38

ShyMaryEllen · 11/08/2025 10:51

I'd like to see compulsory eye tests for all drivers, with a form the optician has to complete and send to the DVLA. A simple yes/no to the question 'is this person's sight such that it is likely to impede their driving?' would do. I think it is discriminatory to bring it in for people at a certain age when younger people could be driving with far worse sight.

More people over 70 wear glasses than don't, so I don't think it's discriminatory at all. Eyesight fails as you get older.

MikeRafone · 11/08/2025 12:38

TennisLady · 11/08/2025 12:04

This is when people should plan ahead for their old age and face the reality that they won’t be safe to drive a vehicle as they get older, so need to think carefully about living out in the sticks.

über is probably cheaper than owning, maintaining and running a car

My next door neighbour sold his car for £5000, he saves £2500 a year on car insurance and £200 on car tax, £50 on MOT and £180 on service

He just gets an uber or taxi to take him everywhere he wants to go and as of yet - 2 years later hasn't got through the £10000 and tbh is never likely to as he only used the car to go to church and grocery shopping

spoonbillstretford · 11/08/2025 12:38

While I agree with the measures I think some people here are forgetting that it is legal to drive with glasses or contact lenses! Obviously it's mandatory to wear them if you need them for driving. DH has been shortsighted since childhood but obviously wears his glasses or contacts.

Unless you are saying only people with perfect 20/20 vision should be able to drive.

MikeRafone · 11/08/2025 12:39

spoonbillstretford · 11/08/2025 12:38

While I agree with the measures I think some people here are forgetting that it is legal to drive with glasses or contact lenses! Obviously it's mandatory to wear them if you need them for driving. DH has been shortsighted since childhood but obviously wears his glasses or contacts.

Unless you are saying only people with perfect 20/20 vision should be able to drive.

but some people, even with glasses - will fail the driving sight test

JudgeJ · 11/08/2025 12:39

mrsneville · 11/08/2025 12:34

Eyesight deteriorates with age. Good eyesight is also important for operating a vehicle. So no, I don't think it's unreasonable.

Not always the case, my prescription gets lighter every test I have, the optician says it's not usual but it does happen.

Beachtastic · 11/08/2025 12:40

ttcat37 · 11/08/2025 10:52

An eye test falls short of what should really be happening. The standard of driving in the elderly, generally, is fucking woeful. It’s not just eyesight but cognitive decline and we’re relying on them to be honest and declare when they shouldn’t be driving anymore. There should be a re-test every 3-5 years for over 70s.

Agree! I remember when I was a kid, my dad moaning about an accident up the road where a young motorcyclist had been killed by an elderly driver who just pulled out without looking. Dad was vehement about how dangerous old people are behind the wheel of a car.

FF to him in his 80s, and he'd be cursing "that bloody road sign" that somehow suddenly appeared at the side of a long straight country road to rip his wing mirror off in passing. A friend commiserated that her own father was regularly mounting the kerb on the opposite pavement when turning a corner.

Everyone ages differently, but decline in driving ability can become very obvious in later years.

spoonbillstretford · 11/08/2025 12:40

MikeRafone · 11/08/2025 12:39

but some people, even with glasses - will fail the driving sight test

Yes, quite, and this does quite rightly need picking up.

MrsSlocombesCat · 11/08/2025 12:41

Shellyash · 11/08/2025 12:17

I think a basic competency test should be mandatory every 5 years also. The amount of drivers that i see daily not keeping left unless overtaking. Also illegal immigrants should never be allowed to drive in the UK.

Illegal immigrants can't get a license so that doesn't make sense.

PollysPocketss · 11/08/2025 12:41

@FridgeJenga Did you genuinely not understand the news on this?

That's how it comes over from your post.

Or were you trying to be provocative?

It's not about drivers over 70 being banned, as you really ought to understand.
It's about drivers over 70 being made to have a compulsory eye test.

OnARainyDay2012 · 11/08/2025 12:41

citychick · 11/08/2025 10:46

My family members live in the countryside with no bus routes. They are in their 80s. Still driving, getting regular eye tests. If they can't drive they cannot access anything. So, for as long as they pass their eye tests, they will drive.

They dread the day they cannot use their car. Not everyone lives in the city or has access to public transport.

This is totally irrelevant. They should only drive if its safe for them to do so! It doesn't matter how inconvenient it would be, they could be putting someone else's life at risk.

mrsneville · 11/08/2025 12:42

JudgeJ · 11/08/2025 12:39

Not always the case, my prescription gets lighter every test I have, the optician says it's not usual but it does happen.

Then you are the exception, not the rule. For much of the population, eyesight gets worse with age. There's a word for it, it's called presbyopia.

MrsSlocombesCat · 11/08/2025 12:42

JudgeJ · 11/08/2025 12:39

Not always the case, my prescription gets lighter every test I have, the optician says it's not usual but it does happen.

You're a medical miracle then.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 11/08/2025 12:42

I think that on a public health basis, the start date for mandatory testing should be 40. Not only would that embed it as normal practice for decades, it's a natural point where vision can be deteriorating and, most of all, it could potentially save thousands from losing their sight or being in terrible pain from diseases as a result of early detection of things such as glaucoma, AMD (too late but better than nothing in respect of diabetic complications where the T2 hasn't been diagnosed).

I am sure that it would be met with howls of rage, but that way its not just for the benefit of others, it would benefit them as well. Bet it would be easier to get eyetests if there was suddenly a guaranteed income from everybody over 40 instead just the smaller number who notice changes, look like they're playing the trombone when given a leaflet or are aware of what medical conditions they have or family members suffered from.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 11/08/2025 12:43

ttcat37 · 11/08/2025 10:52

An eye test falls short of what should really be happening. The standard of driving in the elderly, generally, is fucking woeful. It’s not just eyesight but cognitive decline and we’re relying on them to be honest and declare when they shouldn’t be driving anymore. There should be a re-test every 3-5 years for over 70s.

I wholeheartedly agree.

A friend was killed by a driver who admitted he had a moment where he forgot how to use the pedals so accelerated at a busy junction with a crossing.

We are currently trying to get my nan to retire from work, because she has to drive between 3 different cities, however it's happened often when in the car together, especially at lighted roundabouts, she will see another flow of cars moving and automatically accelerate, and one of us has to shout stop. She swerves between lanes because she forgets which lane to be in. She has been assessed and the doctor says there's no sign of a cognitive illness, just age related cognitive decline, and the only thing she had to declare to the DVLA when renewing her license was myopathy for which she wears corrective lenses.

I really think there should be a mandatory retesting and a full medical check.

PollysPocketss · 11/08/2025 12:43

My family members live in the countryside with no bus routes. They are in their 80s. Still driving, getting regular eye tests. If they can't drive they cannot access anything. So, for as long as they pass their eye tests, they will drive.
They dread the day they cannot use their car. Not everyone lives in the city or has access to public transport.

@citychick so if the time comes when they can't drive, then you or other people will have to step in - with lifts, online shopping and home delivery , or they can take a taxi.

How do you think the millions of elderly people manage if they can't drive or don't own a car?

Nothing to do with being in a village.

LuckyBluePhoton · 11/08/2025 12:48

Speed Freaks & Slow Coaches ruin the roads for Bus Drivers

nomas · 11/08/2025 12:49

beachwalkx · 11/08/2025 10:42

I don’t get why he can’t get one - I got one the same day at specsavers and there’s so many opticians you can go to

Yes, sounds like he is looking for an excuse.

Swipe left for the next trending thread