Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Over 70s to face driving ban...

328 replies

FridgeJenga · 11/08/2025 10:35

if they fail mandatory eye tests.

What's your opinion?
Is 70 too "young", or about right?
Would 75 be a better compromise?
Currently there is no legal age at which you must surrender your driving licence.
Both my father and FIL voluntarily gave up their licences just before they turned 80. My mum at 76, and MIL is still driving at 78, though only very locally.

(Also in the same article, drink driving limits are under discussion to be lowered, in line with Scotland's laws. This one I fully agree with)

OP posts:
Comefromaway · 11/08/2025 13:32

ShesTheAlbatross · 11/08/2025 12:27

It is easy. They ask for info you may not have, but it’s not required. Name and address plus a description of the medical issues is the only required information. I have done it before. It took one report with just name and address and they contacted the person about it. It was all anonymous.

Well it took several submissions over the course of a year and the form would not submit without certain info.

Comefromaway · 11/08/2025 13:32

I don't want to go into further details as my family know my username and as far as anyone else knows it was probably a neighbour

notnorman · 11/08/2025 13:33

From my experience of family- older people have lots of bumps - walks, bollards, other cars in car parks - which are never reported, and they don’t drive far and they’re slow so people/other cars can get out of their way.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 11/08/2025 13:34

Snorlaxo · 11/08/2025 13:31

Are eye tests not mandatory in the UK when (initially) applying for a driving licence??

When you take your driving test, you have to read a number plate from a certain distance. I can’t remember if you declare whether or not you wear glasses or lenses when you apply for a provisional license.

Okay.... Interesting. Just a number plate? We have to go to an optometrist that decides whether you're allowed to drive with corrections (aka glasses or lenses), without corrections or not at all.

After 75 seniors have to get a medical test every 2nd year to test whether they're still fit to drive. Although there are debates whether somebody's primary care physician wouldn't be biased (in favour of their patient) AFAIK🤔

Yachtingaroundtheworldiwish · 11/08/2025 13:35

It makes more sense if everyone can see clearly to drive.

C8H10N4O2 · 11/08/2025 13:40

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 11/08/2025 13:27

Are eye tests not mandatory in the UK when (initially) applying for a driving licence??

Anyhow: Eye sight tends to worsen with age. The likelihood of somebody's sight decreasing to dangerous levels that make driving (even with the appropriate sight correction) unsafe will therefore also increase with age. So why wouldn't one make those tests mandatory?

One could argue that everyone's sight should be tested regularly. But I would assume that the cost would massively outweigh the benefits...

The only testing done by the examiner is “read that number plate over there”. There is little more they can do.

There is no reason why an eye test certificate couldn’t be a requirement of the initial test and each ten year renewal. For everything else the legislation is in place - people are choosing not to use it.

JamieCannister · 11/08/2025 13:40

frozendaisy · 11/08/2025 10:39

They are only proposing testing eyesight, which is essential for safe driving.

So don’t see a problem really.

100%.

But I would go further. IMHO driving is not a "right" it is a "privilege" that is available to all of those who meet certain criteria.

I think that we should be much tougher in terms of demanding high standards of driving and driver eyesight / reaction times / spatial awareness / cognitive abilities. We should be much more willing to stop people driving if they are not up to it due to failing health, poor behaviour, or simple lack of competence.

LikeABat · 11/08/2025 13:41

@nomas He is waiting for a DVLA vision test and/or hospital appointment with a specialist not a standard sight test. The DVLA tests are only available at some Specsavers branches so there may well be a wait.

He could stop driving whilst waiting. Lots of people with glaucoma can drive legally.

prelovedusername · 11/08/2025 13:42

If the issue had been reaction times I might be more sympathetic but everyone I know over 70 uses specs if they need them. The only people I know who don’t, and should, are middle aged women who don’t want to wear them out of vanity.

So no, I think it’s a pointless and ill thought out move.

RosesAndHellebores · 11/08/2025 13:43

I'm 65. I don't have an issue with this proposal. However, I hope that nobody who needs cataract surgery will be expected to wait for so long for it that they have a period when they are unable to drive.

C8H10N4O2 · 11/08/2025 13:43

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 11/08/2025 13:34

Okay.... Interesting. Just a number plate? We have to go to an optometrist that decides whether you're allowed to drive with corrections (aka glasses or lenses), without corrections or not at all.

After 75 seniors have to get a medical test every 2nd year to test whether they're still fit to drive. Although there are debates whether somebody's primary care physician wouldn't be biased (in favour of their patient) AFAIK🤔

Where are you? In the UK there is no culture of regular medicals for preventative care of the type I’ve had in countries with state backed insurance models. For an HGV/PSV licence you need a medical but not for driving a standard vehicle.

Honestly I’d say everyone driving a vehicle on the road ought to be monitoring their health, not just those over a certain age.

Comefromaway · 11/08/2025 13:43

My husband voluntarily gave up his driving licence for 3 years because he was not fit to drive due to a medical condition. It impacted our lives massively and impacted his work as public transport could not get hi to work on time. He didn't apply to a job that was perfect for him and where they approached him due to travel.

But he did it because it was the right thing to do. Driving as PP said, is a privilege, not a right.

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 11/08/2025 13:44

ttcat37 · 11/08/2025 11:02

Young drivers continue to improve, and quickly. Elderly drivers continue to decline, quickly, and refuse to accept it.

If it's the young people who cause the most accidents and the most fatalities, it does argue that they should be given much more training and supervision. Or allowed to drive only when they are older. "Improving out of it" doesn't alter the fact we're talking about deaths, devasted families and a large economic impact.

Although regular tests for everyone are a good idea anyway. The standard of driving is awful.

Iloveeverycat · 11/08/2025 13:44

I think all drivers should have a compulsory eye test every 2 years. Can you imagine how many people are driving who have bad eyesigh. It won't stop people driving as they can get glasses. I had to have glasses for driving when I was 45 from routine test.

the5thgoldengirl · 11/08/2025 13:44

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

countrygirl99 · 11/08/2025 13:45

rickyrickygrimes · 11/08/2025 13:24

I completely agree that it needs to be controlled and that unsafe drivers need to be off the road.

At the same time it’s a lot more than an ‘inconvenience’ for people to make the change. My parents have lived in this rural community for nearly 60 years, and in their home (which they built themselves) for nearly 40 years. This is where their entire support network is, it’s where all their friends are. My sister and I don’t live close by, so the friends and the supportive community they live in is a huge part of their lives. It’s a very, very big deal for them to contemplate moving in their 80s, to a completely different kind of place (town), not knowing anyone, and to go from being surrounded by trees and fields, to being in a town. It’s going to break their hearts. Maybe they should have sacrificed it all earlier in anticipation of this happening - but I’m not blaming them for staying put as long as they can, I would too. They will of course do whatever is legally required, and of that means they stop driving, so be it. But the fall out for our family is going to be as lot more than an ‘inconvenience’ .

Being killed or injured by someone who shouldn't be driving is bloody inconvenient too.
Inconvenient/upheaval because you are unfit to drive. Tough shit, deal with it and plan ahead.

AnybodyAnywhere · 11/08/2025 13:45

I’m 70 and drive a lot and it would completely change my life if I couldn’t - but I’d rather that than kill myself ot, even worse, somebody else because of my failing eyesight.

Everyone who has a licence should have their eyes tested at regular intervals, longer when younger and shorter when older. Surely it would be simple for the optician to just tick a box on your DVLA record? If you don’t get ticked or your eyesight is deemed too poor then your licence is suspended.

One thing I would do is to ‘discourage’ older people from driving at night. As you age your night vision deteriorates and nothing can be done to improve it. I restrict myself to well known and well lit roads after dark as much as I can.

I have over 50 years of driving experience and a good, well maintained car. I even did a bit of motor sport ‘back in the day’. If I was in charge (!) I’d make attending a very hard hitting ‘speed awareness’ style course an essential element of the driving test.

TreadSoftlyOnMyDreams · 11/08/2025 13:47

No one should be able to self certify their own eyesight and the drivers licence should state whether glasses are required. End of.

The headline is a bit of a joke. Anyone should lose their licence for driving with inadequate sight, it's a no brainer. It just so happens that 70 is the threshold after which people are asked to renew their licences and answer these questions again, which is fair given so many will be on medication and have health issues.

tartyflette · 11/08/2025 13:49

beachwalkx · 11/08/2025 10:42

I don’t get why he can’t get one - I got one the same day at specsavers and there’s so many opticians you can go to

Was he perhaps trying to get a free eye test and was either ineligible or found the usual places, opticians' premises etc, were unwilling to do it for free?

C8H10N4O2 · 11/08/2025 13:49

countrygirl99 · 11/08/2025 13:45

Being killed or injured by someone who shouldn't be driving is bloody inconvenient too.
Inconvenient/upheaval because you are unfit to drive. Tough shit, deal with it and plan ahead.

That would assume for someone in their 80s in a rural area that they were both able to predict the trashing of public transport and had the money to move somewhere more expensive. I know people who did move to the nearest small town in their 60s only to find transport links cut ten years later.

Removing someone from their support network is also a contributor to decline. I don’t want unsafe drivers on the road but the issues of rural transport are genuine and needs addressing, both for people trying to work and for those not able to drive.

C8H10N4O2 · 11/08/2025 13:52

RosesAndHellebores · 11/08/2025 13:43

I'm 65. I don't have an issue with this proposal. However, I hope that nobody who needs cataract surgery will be expected to wait for so long for it that they have a period when they are unable to drive.

My DM ended up going private for exactly this reason. The wait was so long (years) that the second eye started developing and she wasn’t happy driving even with one declining eye, it was out of the question once the second was clouding.

Many older people use their life savings to pay for cataract/hip type surgeries due to lengthy waits, despite the evidence showing that quick treatment of these types of conditions can result in longer good health and mobility ie lower overall cost to the state.

LikeABat · 11/08/2025 13:53

@tartyflette probably a special DVLA vision test that's not available everywhere or appointment with hospital opthalmology department.

nmsi · 11/08/2025 13:53

Good.
If they fail the test and the issue can't be corrected with glasses or contacts then they should be off the roads because it's unsafe. Of course it will make life harder for them but it's not ok for anyone, of any age, to be driving away with poor eyesight.
I think everyone should have to have compulsory eye tests every few years. Declining vision creeps up on people and often they don't realize how bad it is if they aren't having regular tests.

I'm in an EU country where you have to provide a statement from an optician about your eyesight or, in some cases, from an opthamologist who will do field vision tests among other things, before you start driving lessons. Opticians in this country only prescribe glasses, they don't do tests or examine the eye like UK opticians do.
In any case, if you have to wear glasses or contacts to drive that is recorded on the back of the driving licence and you can get points/be fined/be banned for driving without them.
I had cataracts a couple of years ago (quite young), they developed very quickly and I stopped myself from driving until they were operated on. The surgeon told me there are people driving around all over the place with far worse eyesight than mine was. That's very scary.
After the operation I no longer needed glasses and it was a right rigamarole to get the "glasses or contacts" symbol removed from the back of the licence, with lots of opthalmologist tests first.

Some things in this country are stricter than the UK system regarding eyesight and driving but we still haven't got to the point where you have to have regular tests and I really think we should.

I don't understand why the man in the article couldn't get an optician's appointment or am I missing something?

Tiredjusttired · 11/08/2025 13:55

The testing of elderly drivers has come up many times before in parliament over a few decades. Nothing has been done. So, It is unlikely that anything will be done now.

Firstly, the medical profession will object, on the grounds of confidentiality, to be made to inform the dvla about an elderly person’s poor eyesight.

Secondly, the elderly are a majority voting block, so will never agree to this. They will have hige support from local councillors, ministers and large organisations/lobby groups like Age UK. Cue soecial pleading on channel 4 news as an elderly person living in the sticks tells the nation about lack of bus services.

Thirdly, it can only really be enforced when an elderly person has an accident or kills someone through poor eyesight induced driving. There simply aren’t the police officers around to do stop and checks of the elderly.

We will simply continue with self cert and elderly people saying they’re fine, or that their past unblemished record is proof of perfect driving in the future.

LikeABat · 11/08/2025 13:57

@Iloveeverycat Lots of the eye conditions that are more likely to affect older people such as cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration aren't corrected by glasses. Makes it even more important to have your eyes regularly tested at an optician when you get older.