Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Who broke Britain?

410 replies

User32459 · 08/08/2025 09:58

Who do you most blame for our downfall as a nation?

A) Tony Blair and New Labour (97-2010)

B) The Tories (2010-2024)

C) The current Labour government

D) Brexit and Nigel Farage's lies

I think the answer is all of the above and the current government are an absolute disaster, but to be fair to them they've come in at the end when the damage is done. It's not 1997 anymore when they can get away with Blairite policies.

Labour have a lot to answer for but i'd probably go B. The Tories just about got everything wrong. Did they do anything good at all? And ultimately their shocking governance led to Brexit as well.

And the failures of the lot of them will need to Nigel Farage as Prime Minister.

OP posts:
waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:18

OAPs are costly. But they did generally contribute through their lives. We now have mumpers and dole bludgers reaching old age and who haven’t paid in.

No they didn't which is the point!
mumpers & dole bludgers (whatever they are) exist in every generation..,

Skybluepinky · 08/08/2025 15:22

Greedy business owners who don’t pay staff fair wages and expect the state to top up people wages.

the5thgoldengirl · 08/08/2025 15:23

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Typicalwave · 08/08/2025 15:25

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 08/08/2025 15:15

OAPs are costly. But they did generally contribute through their lives. We now have mumpers and dole bludgers reaching old age and who haven’t paid in.

Nope. No more than generation X have been contributing.

Except X face things like the triple lock being erased for theif pension whilst many have struggled to save for my thing private and on top of NI contributions are having to pay a workplace pension too - today’s pensioners are utterly dependant on the tax payer on a promise that was set to break our backs and futures.

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:28

What are the realistic options for that age group though? What would you want to see happen

I would lower the threshold of household income of winter fuel, 75k is pointless

I would temporarily pause the triple lock as it's not affordable at the moment.

Care in the home needs to be funded (along the lines of Theresa Mays proposal) with a charge on the home. I would change the proposed cap on care costs to a % as otherwise you have some losing virtually everything vs those who hardly feel it.

We need to do something about the upcoming pensioners who have higher numbers of renters, maybe a social housing programme to concentrate on that demographic.

Incredibly controversial but waiting lists for NHS treatments and operations need to prioritise younger people. I'm not young.

I don't think any of the suggestions are realistic hence why we are stuck in a downward spiral now.

Typicalwave · 08/08/2025 15:31

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 15:17

What are the realistic options for that age group though? What would you want to see happen

What would I want to see happen? Means testing of the state benefit for a start off, means testing of winter fuel, means testing of free bus passes, borrowing on yheir homes where they are under occupied.

This idea that all pensioners are a sacred cows who have had the yolk around their necks for decades to pay into a pot and now with their haunches sharply poking through their skin because they’re practically starving to death needs to stop.

There is no magic pension fund - our taxes are paying it.

Means test everything .

PerhapsaSillyQuestion · 08/08/2025 15:31

A because it was Tony Blairs lifting of workers rights that saw the country flooded with eastern europeans which negatively impacted many communities due to sheer volume of people.
It was not implemented properly ,they had no idea how many people came in , and unfortunately it laid the bedrock for Brexit and has sparked an anti immigration stance since.

Edited to add ...obviously the EE who came here ,who wouldn't !! Not blaming anyone for seizing opportunity etc

UrgentScurryfunge · 08/08/2025 15:32

Gove's (and his successors') reforms of education have been a disaster, and the curriculum is not fit for the range of human ability and aptitude or the needs of employers across the ecomomy.

Failures to meet the needs of SEN pupils cost parents their jobs or trigger underemployment.

So many secondary students switch off because the dry "academic" curriculum does not meet their needs. Practical and vocational subjects have been massively devalued and often dropped forcing students to flounder in inappropriate GCSE courses and emerge with poor employability, and no aspiration.

The Blair years were better. Subject choices were more diverse and there was replacement of crumbling infrastructure. However the PFIs were often unnecessarily costly in the long term, and they also kept walking down the path of toxic OFSTED and league table culture and started the academies which have brought their own issues. Post-2010, that's become worse, but it wasn't a uniquely Conservative vision.

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:32

All those people of our grandparents and parents age paid in and what do they get now? '

We have to stope this rhetoric that people paid in enough because they haven't. Think logically about it!!!!

The state pension is 12k a year so 240k over 20 years. To pay that in tax you need to earn more than 50k for 20 years!! We know most people don't earn that or the equivalent & that's before health care costs, education costs etc.

It's not usual to have not paid in enough and when you have pyramid demographics it works. It doesn't when you don't.

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:35

unusual

Needlenardlenoo · 08/08/2025 15:36

My PIL are lovely, kind people. FIL retired at 55 (with a full pension as he'd started at 16). MIL has not worked since her mid 20s. Both are mid/late 80s. My parents are similar although my DM has a successful self-employed business for most of her life (but DF preferred her to keep it under taxable levels: tbf he has paid heaps of tax and given a lot away).

Although all 4 are in good nick, fingers crossed, there is absolutely no way 3/4 of them will end their lives as net contributors.

Life expectancy leaped ahead of work expectations (on average of course - not all areas).

Needlenardlenoo · 08/08/2025 15:39

I think it would have been very difficult for MIL to work professionally and FIL would have found it a slight that he couldn't "keep" a wife. My DM could have kept operating her business for profit if she'd wanted and needed to.

Needlenardlenoo · 08/08/2025 15:40

The ironic thing is that PIL plus other inlaws live in a deprived part of the country that is a net recipient - but blame London.

UrgentScurryfunge · 08/08/2025 15:40

PerhapsaSillyQuestion · 08/08/2025 15:31

A because it was Tony Blairs lifting of workers rights that saw the country flooded with eastern europeans which negatively impacted many communities due to sheer volume of people.
It was not implemented properly ,they had no idea how many people came in , and unfortunately it laid the bedrock for Brexit and has sparked an anti immigration stance since.

Edited to add ...obviously the EE who came here ,who wouldn't !! Not blaming anyone for seizing opportunity etc

Edited

Immigration has often been used as a sticking plaster. It has its uses, particularly to temporarily cover skills gaps, but various governments have used it to dodge long term planning for training and recruitment for at least 20 years.

To get the domestic population into specific careers, the courses need to be appropriately accessible, affordable and the working conditions need to be sustainable to be retained in the profession. Recruitment processes also need to be practical.

Cuts and staffing reductions have left workers on a knife edge of survival mode and little slack to accomodate additional issues (such as sick leave)

Alexandra2001 · 08/08/2025 15:44

bombastix · 08/08/2025 15:08

Yes. Our workers are diminishing. They cannot fund this welfare state. You either tax them to try to do that or you cut those benefits.

Labour has tried and failed to manage disability benefits. It has failed. It will not have the appetite to engage with pensions or age dependent spending. A tougher government will do that, I think.

Labours savings on benefits amounted to 5 billion, a tiny % of whats needed.

We will need to tax property & assets, both Germany and France, among others tax the profit when a house is sold.

Reverse the NI cut, thats costing us 11bn per year

I think it may fall upon Reeves to start taxing us all a little more, most can afford it.

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:46

I think it may fall upon Reeves to start taxing us all a little more, most can afford it.

Can they?

Lower & middle income paye earners are taxed less here vs other European countries but here they spend a higher % on housing.

JamesMacGill · 08/08/2025 15:46

Alexandra2001 · 08/08/2025 15:44

Labours savings on benefits amounted to 5 billion, a tiny % of whats needed.

We will need to tax property & assets, both Germany and France, among others tax the profit when a house is sold.

Reverse the NI cut, thats costing us 11bn per year

I think it may fall upon Reeves to start taxing us all a little more, most can afford it.

No they can’t.

Do you work? How much do you earn? Do you have kids?

I feel like people on benefits are so used to getting everything free or discounted, and money just ‘appearing’, and their social housing being cheap, that they are massively out of touch with how expensive life is when you pay a mortgage and have zero financial help other than the money you earn.

Most cannot afford it. Or they could, in theory, but would have to go without and live life utterly on the breadline and they would give up on work completely. And if people on benefits should be able to live a comfortable life with treats and holidays, why can’t they?

PerhapsaSillyQuestion · 08/08/2025 15:47

@UrgentScurryfunge no country needs a sudden influx of hundreds of thousands .

LizTruss · 08/08/2025 15:47

Don't look at me for this one! 🤣🤣🤣

JamesMacGill · 08/08/2025 15:48

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:46

I think it may fall upon Reeves to start taxing us all a little more, most can afford it.

Can they?

Lower & middle income paye earners are taxed less here vs other European countries but here they spend a higher % on housing.

Agree.

These people have no clue.

Absolutely none.

Happyher · 08/08/2025 15:48

You missed out Thatcher. She decimated the steel and mining industries I’m my region and did nothing to replace the jobs. She also started the curs to public services

Namitynamename · 08/08/2025 15:48

StarlightRobot · 08/08/2025 10:42

I also think the British public need to carry the blame for this. The current government was elected on a mandate that didn’t make sense- that taxes won’t be raised and they will secure growth, without any credible growth plans. They public cries in horror at any attempt to tinker with the NHS or welfare related. But we are all in denial if we fail to recognise the need for very significant structural change so that the welfare state remains affordable and does not collapse. The public want everything- low tax but generous benefits and healthcare free at the point of use. It’s not sustainable.

I also blame Osborne and Cameron for how they approached austerity- they just cut budgets everywhere but did not reform the scope of what the state would offer. It was doomed to fail. The public would have been open to genuine reform at that point because there was a general acceptance that the deficit had to be addressed. They completely messed this up.

I don’t believe labour will ever be honest about the changes that need to be made but I completely understand why they were the better option to the conservatives.

I would love to see a new voice in politics which is utterly focused on building the economy and also willing to tackle the ballooned public sector from a systemic approach. New ideas are needed and wholesale change is necessary.

Edited

The huge jump in the National debt wasn't because of the welfare state causing a welfare deficit. It was because the banks artificially creating a housing bubble through excessive lending to the point where the loans could never be repaid. When this inevitably hit the fan, it was necessary for the UK government (among others) to spend unbelievably huge amounts to stop the whole banking sector collapsing. The banks went back to paying huge bonuses to their top employees almost immediately. Austerity continued for ordinary people for over a decade. Private equity now owns an unprecedented amount of land, property and businesses in the UK and elsewhere

We kicked the can down the road in 2008 but never addressed the key problems. So that would be
a) Labour- for loosening regulations and allowing the banks to get out of control in the first place
b) Conservatives for blaming the poor/welfare and stirring up resentment against immigrants for austerity rather than getting to grips with the issue
c) Labour for still failing to address this reality
d) Farage and the shower of bankers in his party who made everything worse through Brexit and who basically sees the chance to asset strip the UK down to the copper wires.

EasternStandard · 08/08/2025 15:48

waitingforpost · 08/08/2025 15:46

I think it may fall upon Reeves to start taxing us all a little more, most can afford it.

Can they?

Lower & middle income paye earners are taxed less here vs other European countries but here they spend a higher % on housing.

Mn goes strong on tax more, for other people. But I agree there isn’t more there. Labour will have to find another way, it’s due to the earlier NI tax after all.

autienotnaughty · 08/08/2025 15:50

It started with Blair although we didn’t feel it at the time. Then the tories and leaving the eu and also COVID.

bombastix · 08/08/2025 15:50

I am not persuaded on income tax. The reality is that unless you are a higher rate tax payer now, you are not contributing. Income tax would have to increase across all tax paying strata to make any kind of meaningful difference. I am a centre left person but pretending that there is a class of exclusively very rich people who can bear these increases is not realistic (I believe that Labour know that too). They will leave because they can. Our tax system is a mess. We have ended up with a system where most working people do not contribute. You cannot run a country with an increasing need for welfare and pensions like that. Yet we have.