I'm following the revelations about 'Raynor Winn' and the alleged crime and deception covered up in her books with great interest, as someone who was greatly comforted and inspired by her writing, and her and 'Moth's' supposed journey. I've commented on the threads on here several times. I've name changed for this post.
One aspect of the whole affair that keeps cropping up is, why none of this came out sooner. One suggestion is that the people who'd been conned by the Winn's wouldn't have necessarily known how to go about exposing them, who to contact, or were afraid of not being believed and the potential repercussions, or simply that they had made contact with a journalist or somebody in the past but didn't get anywhere.
This leads me to think of a couple of situations I'm aware of, both known about by many people but somehow not in the wider public domain, and the perpetrators have never been held to account.
One concerns a large organisation causing widescale and totally unnecessary environmental harm. There have been protests up and down the country and there's been a bit of local news coverage. Solicitor friends of mine have devoted a lot of time to this and are totally satisfied that the company is acting unlawfully. I actually emailed the environmental investigative journalist George Monbiot but never received a reply.
The second regards appalling misconduct and very likely sexual abuse involving an MP and local government leaders. I don't have any hard evidence but I've seen disgusting photos and messages and it's pretty well known in my social circles.
How does one go about exposing matters of these types? I'd love an investigative journalist to get onto both case but I'm sure they're inundated with requests/ suggestions.