So responding to what you actually said, rather than what you think you said, or what you meant to say (but didnt) is "simplistic?"
You can get whatever enjoyment from having books you want. You can be sad if you don't have books. You do you.
Nobody is calling anyone snobbish or having pretensions of intellectual superiory just for reading. If you had bothered reading anyone else's posts, including mine, you will see that many of us are ALSO very frequent readers. I have a masters in literature and read daily.
In your original post you only said you feel sorry for people who don't OWN books. That is what is ridiculous.
It is also illogical (for most people owning books doesn't equal any additional enjoyment or knowledge than just reading them), materialistic, (as you are valuing the item itself rather than solely the contents), unempathetic and quite insensitive ( you are essentially judging people who might not have enough money to buy multiple books, who live in too small a house, who have housing insecurity, who are dyslexic, who is blind, who have moved from another country and wasn't able to transport multiple crates of books), not to mention patronising - be completely honest, how would YOU feel if someone said they "felt sorry for you" for not having something?
Once more for those in the back:
NOTHING WRONG WITH ENJOYING READING
RUDE AND STRANGE TO JUDGE OTHER PEOPLE ON WHETHER THEY PROMINENTLY DISPLAY PHYSICAL BOOKS IN THEIR MAIN LIVING SPACE FOR ALL VISITORS TO NOTE