Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Washington DC Plane/Helicopter Collision

336 replies

ThatEllie · 30/01/2025 03:46

Is anyone awake and following this, or anyone in the States? It looks horrific. A US military Blackhawk helicopter collided with an American Airlines plane and both went down into the Potomac River.

You can see helicopters circling like mad on FlightRadar. I really hope they’re finding people.

www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/29/us/plane-crash-washington-dc

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
notimagain · 30/01/2025 07:42

Overtheatlantic · 30/01/2025 04:40

Flying at night in an urban setting and crashing into a massive jet flying at a low altitude. Very strange.

Not at all strange, there’s a military base that operates helicopters 24/7 fairly adjacent to DCA.

In response to other comments:

Yes hard to see other aircraft at night against a lot environment (e.g. city) and FWIW some of the electronic collision avoidance devices operate in a alightkybdegraded at very low level.

Can’t see how all the discussion about “Doomsday plane” is relevant to this at all.

Clearinguptheclutter · 30/01/2025 07:43

Awful tragedy

I just don’t understand why a helicopter was allowed to take off in such close proximity to a final approach path

notimagain · 30/01/2025 07:46

Itsalwaysfools · 30/01/2025 07:40

Nope. Crashing in to water is catastrophic and more likely to end in deaths, not less likely. The surface tension of water is as hard as concrete.

Ummm…not sure that’s quite correct TBH, certainly surface tension doesn’t really enter into it.

The big problem with the Potomac ATM will be water temperature.

TravellingTartan · 30/01/2025 07:49

Sky news reporting

Washington DC Plane/Helicopter Collision
NigelHarmansNewWife · 30/01/2025 07:49

There has been one landing of a commercial aircraft on water and nothing had crashed into it meaning the pilot had an opportunity to control things. This is very different.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549

Bjorkdidit · 30/01/2025 07:49

MaggieFS · 30/01/2025 06:42

Bloody hell, those poor people. Even if they survived the crash, that water will be freezing.

The speculation is nuts though.

Agree. Helicopters crash a lot, relatively. Often completely accidental, only in the last few days, the crash that killed the owner of Leicester City Football Club a few years ago was ruled to be an accident.

It also could be the case that the air disturbance caused by a jet coming into land could be enough to affect the flight stability of a nearby helicopter, although obviously these things should never get anywhere close enough to crash into each other.

Bjorkdidit · 30/01/2025 07:50

Itsalwaysfools · 30/01/2025 07:40

Nope. Crashing in to water is catastrophic and more likely to end in deaths, not less likely. The surface tension of water is as hard as concrete.

Plus if the water is freezing the time you survive if you can't get out is short.

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 30/01/2025 08:00

ShadowCalls · 30/01/2025 07:28

any reason why you can't google?

Absolutely this. People on a website unable to go to another website and type in “what is a doomsday plane?”🙄

Anonymouse27 · 30/01/2025 08:03

In my defence, I thought it was a metaphor rather than a type of aircraft. What website do yo7 t3commend to explore what I should make of it landing 45 m from the airport?

LimeGoose · 30/01/2025 08:04

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 30/01/2025 08:00

Absolutely this. People on a website unable to go to another website and type in “what is a doomsday plane?”🙄

Wouldn’t it be more useful to have the definition on here rather than everyone having to google individually, though?

crumblingschools · 30/01/2025 08:04

@MrsElijahMikaelson1 maybe posters also wanted to know why someone thought the domesday plane was significant in this scenario

Ineedashero · 30/01/2025 08:06

I dont understand how / why the helicopter just carried on after being told by air traffic control there was a plane nearby? And the helicopter seemingly didn't respond? I think that will need to be an area of focus - what was going on in that helicopter?

lilacsatin · 30/01/2025 08:07

Ineedashero · 30/01/2025 08:06

I dont understand how / why the helicopter just carried on after being told by air traffic control there was a plane nearby? And the helicopter seemingly didn't respond? I think that will need to be an area of focus - what was going on in that helicopter?

There were two planes coming in. One further away, and the one the copter hit.

notimagain · 30/01/2025 08:09

Ineedashero · 30/01/2025 08:06

I dont understand how / why the helicopter just carried on after being told by air traffic control there was a plane nearby? And the helicopter seemingly didn't respond? I think that will need to be an area of focus - what was going on in that helicopter?

ATC, lookout etc will be of many many things the investigation will look at, you won’t get a credible answer to those sort of questions for months.

Bjorkdidit · 30/01/2025 08:10

Anonymouse27 · 30/01/2025 08:03

In my defence, I thought it was a metaphor rather than a type of aircraft. What website do yo7 t3commend to explore what I should make of it landing 45 m from the airport?

Well immediately after the crash the local airport was closed, and that was probably the next closest one.

I don't know about the 'doomsday plane' but having Googled, I see that it's nothing more than a mobile emergency response centre so no more remarkable than a hospital or fire engine.

notimagain · 30/01/2025 08:10

NigelHarmansNewWife · 30/01/2025 07:49

There has been one landing of a commercial aircraft on water and nothing had crashed into it meaning the pilot had an opportunity to control things. This is very different.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549

For info there have been several, e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GarudaIndonesiaFlight421

Sully wasn’t the first, but as you rightly mention you need an intact’ish aircraft to start with.

Garuda Indonesia Flight 421 - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garuda_Indonesia_Flight_421

Chersfrozenface · 30/01/2025 08:12

Ineedashero · 30/01/2025 08:06

I dont understand how / why the helicopter just carried on after being told by air traffic control there was a plane nearby? And the helicopter seemingly didn't respond? I think that will need to be an area of focus - what was going on in that helicopter?

According to the blog of an experienced helicopter pilot, military aircraft communicate via UHF, so on available recordings we would hear the tower talking to the helicopter, but not the helicopter talking to the tower.

HornyHornersPinger · 30/01/2025 08:15

Overtheatlantic · 30/01/2025 04:40

Flying at night in an urban setting and crashing into a massive jet flying at a low altitude. Very strange.

I thought that. From the cctv footage of the collision it looks like the helicopter followed then flew in to it

alittleprivacy · 30/01/2025 08:20

TravellingTartan · 30/01/2025 07:41

Rumours circulating that some young US figure skaters, parents and their Russian coaches were on the flight.

That appears to be confirmed. I skate and am in some online skating groups and people there pretty much knew immediately. They initially hoped the were wrong about which flight it was but it's since been confirmed behind the scenes as families have been contacted.

notimagain · 30/01/2025 08:21

HornyHornersPinger · 30/01/2025 08:15

I thought that. From the cctv footage of the collision it looks like the helicopter followed then flew in to it

I’d caution trying to guesstimate flight paths at night especially from CCTV.

Hedgerow2 · 30/01/2025 08:24

I see Trump is helpfully blaming the control tower on social media. Never misses an opportunity to dish out blame and stir up hatred. No need to wait for the facts.

Chersfrozenface · 30/01/2025 08:24

Overtheatlantic · 30/01/2025 04:40

Flying at night in an urban setting and crashing into a massive jet flying at a low altitude. Very strange.

According to a professional forum, Helicopter Low Level Routes are standardized throughout the DC area. It even provides a map of them.

And the plane's path was also standard.

notimagain · 30/01/2025 08:25

Chersfrozenface · 30/01/2025 08:12

According to the blog of an experienced helicopter pilot, military aircraft communicate via UHF, so on available recordings we would hear the tower talking to the helicopter, but not the helicopter talking to the tower.

From a comms/ recordings POV that’s credible..

alittleprivacy · 30/01/2025 08:27

Hedgerow2 · 30/01/2025 08:24

I see Trump is helpfully blaming the control tower on social media. Never misses an opportunity to dish out blame and stir up hatred. No need to wait for the facts.

No he isn't. He's saying that the plane was exactly where it was supposed to be, which is true. And that there is a question around why the helicopter was where it shouldn't have been. Also true.

Your post literally does what it's accusing him of.

crumblingschools · 30/01/2025 08:28

Should Trump be commenting on social media apart from condolences until all the facts are known