Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Question about sexuality when you are straight

31 replies

namesanewnow · 16/01/2025 19:34

Random and hopefully not rude and offensive to anyone here.

I am a tired parent carer so no offended intended here Grin I am curious

I am married to a man. Like men.

Pretty sure I have a fleeting, intense crush on a female friend when I was still in primary school!

Anyway, I have been watching a TV series and the actress is a Trans Lady.

I really fancy this person and wonder if this means I am not straight after all? Or is it that my brain subconsciously knows she is a biological male?

In saying that, I definitely have a bit of a crush on Salma Hayek and feel intensely embarrassed about it because I feel very self conscious if I see her on telly!

OP posts:
Soontobe60 · 17/01/2025 16:43

heyhopotato · 17/01/2025 16:30

You could be pansexual, where the person's sex or gender is irrelevant to you and you just fancy a person because you fancy the person.

AKA bisexual

Daisyvodka · 17/01/2025 16:44

Could be bi! Welcome
I respect the opinion of people further upthread about not needing to label yourself, and that is an okay attitude to have, but just wanted to chime in and say it is also okay to feel like you want to label yourself! There is no right or wrong way. I'm sure it's not how the other posters on this thread have intended, but just to maybe warn you if you've never come across it - some people get a bit... I don't know, weirdly annoyed at you wanting to label yourself a certain way? Like 'why do you have to make it a Thing' sort of attitude. People have fought for a long time to have their relationships recognised and protected in law, because unfortunately the world around us has not historically been (and unfortunately continues to be) a not wholly positive place if you are anything other than straight. So I just want to reiterate that its okay for this to be a big deal, a medium sized deal, a tiny deal, or not a second thought at all to you! But don't let anyone feel like you are being silly or making a fuss over nothing for taking time to think about it.

Frostine · 17/01/2025 16:55

I class myself as straight , married to a man and never had any inclination to lay my hands on a woman or have had any experience of being with a woman sexually .
However , I have often wondered if a women / woman relationship would be more intense and fulfilling because
You'd know what makes them tick , and the relationship would be more on an even keel .
I have met women who I admire and think it would be an amazing relationship to be in if you were both gay . A fab friendship with added benefits I guess .

EBearhug · 18/01/2025 01:11

You'd know what makes them tick

Would you? That's a personality thing more than a sex thing. I have little idea what makes some women tick.

DalzielOrNoDalzielAndDontPascoe · 18/01/2025 01:19

StarlightLady · 17/01/2025 07:40

I don’t know how emotions work with someone who’s trans. Are you attracted to other women as well?

What l do know is that l thought l was straight until my early 30s, when someone showed me that l had, what many would call, a bi side. Like a PP though l don’t think labels are necessary or indeed beneficial. These days l simply regard myself as “sexual” rather than “bisexual”.

OP, you might want to look up the Kinsey scale quiz to help you discover a little more.

Not wanting to derail, but I wouldn't remotely trust anything associated with Kinsey one tiny bit.

He was a disgusting child abusing monster who supposedly studied the 'sexual response' of little children in ways and with beliefs which are far too vile to mention here, loosely dressed up as 'science'. Even hearing or reading his name makes me feel sick.

StarlightLady · 18/01/2025 06:12

DalzielOrNoDalzielAndDontPascoe · 18/01/2025 01:19

Not wanting to derail, but I wouldn't remotely trust anything associated with Kinsey one tiny bit.

He was a disgusting child abusing monster who supposedly studied the 'sexual response' of little children in ways and with beliefs which are far too vile to mention here, loosely dressed up as 'science'. Even hearing or reading his name makes me feel sick.

I mentioned Kinsey in good faith from the little l knew. I was not aware of this and apologise for citing it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread