No. It's more that we are sitting facepalming and saying "That thing we said would happen? This is it, happening." It's not "glee" it's more "despondency at the refusal of Leavers to acknowledge that they voted for this".
We are not "suffering at the hands of the EU" any more than China, Japan, Morocco, or any other country outwith the single market is "suffering at the hands of the EU". The EU is making laws to protect its citizens from shoddy and dangerous goods and we are being treated like every other country that has chosen not to be subject to the rules of the single market.
Norway and Switzerland are not in the EU. Brexit did not have to be like this.
We could have opted to be in the single market. Our govt chose not to negotiate that option.
As for this new legislation, there should be exceptions for countries with equally strong product safety legislation.
Without a binding treaty between the 27 EU countries and the "country with equally strong product safety legislation", the EU27 have no assurance that our (or China's, or Ghana's, or anyone else's) product safety legislation will stay equally strong. Single market membership involves a binding treaty that obliges the non-EU countries to keep regulatory lockstep with the EU concerning all products produced. "All products" because the definition of a single market is the ability to trade freely without any distinction (on paper or in practice) between products made for the domestic market and those made for export.
I recall at the time considerable rightist opposition to any kind of requirement for regulatory lockstep that would affect products made for the domestic market. I remember the Tory press exhorting our politicians to reject any "half-in, half-out" or "all pay, no say" deal in favour of total independence from the EU.
The EU choose not to do this because they behave like a criminal gang who punish members for leaving. These decisions are merely to prevent other member countries from doing the same.
Nope. The EU are treating us exactly like they treat any country who is not in the single market. Your post is reminiscent of a man who divorces his wife and then complains that she won't hoover his new flat or do his laundry for him any more.
These are not the actions of an ethical or benevolent organization.
They are benevolent towards the citizens of 27 EU countries. They are not obliged to be benevolent towards any other country's citizens and should not be if doing so would be detrimental to EU citizens.p
Also, Etsy are damaging the rights of Northern Irish people by going against the Good Friday agreement.
Tell me that you don't understand how treaties work without telling me that you don't understand how treaties work.
The Good Friday Agreement is a treaty between two sovereign nations: Ireland and the UK. The GFA binds the governments of two sovereign nations: Ireland and the UK.
Etsy are not a sovereign nation but a private company. Etsy did not sign the GFA. Etsy are not bound by the terms of the GFA.
Etsy are bound by UK laws. Please find the UK legislation that requires Etsy to implement a feature that allows sellers to make a distinction between Great Britain and Northern Ireland when declaring where they will ship to. I'll wait.
Honestly, there ought to be an exam on treaties and international law before people are allowed to post online about Brexit.