I'd be very grateful for some advice on this - I've never claimed on car insurance before and something isn't quite sitting right with me.
On Sunday another driver ran into the back of me while I was waiting to enter a roundabout - lot of damage to the back of my car and moderate damage to the front of his. I also have a witness who saw the accident and gave me her number. So all in all, I'm confident it's a pretty clear case of him being at fault.
I phoned the insurance straight away, car has been carted off to a garage. I'd be extremely surprised if it's not a write off (old car which now has a massive dent in the back). My question is about the options the insurance company offered to me:
- I go through my underwriter. I pay my excess but should be able to claim it back. I'd get a hire car (not sure how long for, policy suggests 28 days), probably through Enterprise.
- The whole thing goes through Enterprise, they handle getting me a hire car and dealing with the repair of old car (though as I say I don't think it's repairable - I'd be delighted if it was, I loved my knackered old car) and claim it all back from the at fault drivers insurance. I don't have to pay my excess.
The guy I spoke to seemed to really be pushing the second option and I'm not sure why. I checked and he was definitely from my insurance company, not one of these dodgy companies which supply hire cars at exorbitant costs. I don't want to be part of the problem of massively inflated insurance payouts (which push up premiums for everyone) but equally, I don't feel it's solely on me to solve that problem and I do need to get it sorted.
Is there a catch I can't see? Do I need to ask more questions? (and if so, what?) Is one option more likely than the other to lead to my premiums going up next year?
Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this.