Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

UK Farmers

327 replies

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 10:20

Can someone please explain to me what today is all about?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
poppymango · 19/11/2024 16:06

PowerTulle · 19/11/2024 11:35

I think the issue is that Labour have used a sledgehammer to crack a nut. And it comes from a lack of understanding about how rural businesses work. For every so called farmer who sits on a big house and 100 acres as a way to pass on a property tax free, there are many more small working family farms that will be screwed.

There was an interview* floating around online a few days ago with John McTernan, a former Labour strategist.

“We can do to the farmers what Thatcher did to the miners. It’s an industry we could do without. We don’t need small farmers.”

I have no idea whether his views are quietly shared by the current party, but it was nevertheless a very unsettling thing to hear.

*I think it was GB News, please don’t judge me 😂

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 16:09

poppymango · 19/11/2024 16:06

There was an interview* floating around online a few days ago with John McTernan, a former Labour strategist.

“We can do to the farmers what Thatcher did to the miners. It’s an industry we could do without. We don’t need small farmers.”

I have no idea whether his views are quietly shared by the current party, but it was nevertheless a very unsettling thing to hear.

*I think it was GB News, please don’t judge me 😂

Madness. Why do people become so vengeful like this

It's also going against the tide of needing food security and local produce

I value that, I don't want Labour to wreck it

grimupnorthnot · 19/11/2024 16:09

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 10:20

Can someone please explain to me what today is all about?

people who don't understand tax planning - any generational farm, just needs to hand the farm on 7 years before they die - no IHT issues.......... and you can see when idiots like Farage and Clarkson (who literally bought is farm originally to avoid tax) they're just beating a fake drum.....

Farage - who'se done more damage to UK farming than any other individual.

Proudtobeanortherner · 19/11/2024 16:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Scrowy · 19/11/2024 16:10

It seems this will impact on 70,000 of the 209,000 farms in the country.

Take out all the small tax dodge farms at the bottom that aren't really viable farms and I bet that is getting somewhere near most normal family farms operating currently will be impacted

Scrowy · 19/11/2024 16:12

grimupnorthnot · 19/11/2024 16:09

people who don't understand tax planning - any generational farm, just needs to hand the farm on 7 years before they die - no IHT issues.......... and you can see when idiots like Farage and Clarkson (who literally bought is farm originally to avoid tax) they're just beating a fake drum.....

Farage - who'se done more damage to UK farming than any other individual.

How will that work with reservation of benefit which will be the case for most farms handing it over before death.

Do YOU know anything about IHT and tax planning?

GrazeConcern · 19/11/2024 16:14

Farmers absolutely do work into their 80s, my grandad worked until 83 until he became bed bound. Farmers (the ones actually farming not necessarily landowners) have the most incredible work ethic, it’s a culture of its own.

ImNunTheWiser · 19/11/2024 16:20

grimupnorthnot · 19/11/2024 16:09

people who don't understand tax planning - any generational farm, just needs to hand the farm on 7 years before they die - no IHT issues.......... and you can see when idiots like Farage and Clarkson (who literally bought is farm originally to avoid tax) they're just beating a fake drum.....

Farage - who'se done more damage to UK farming than any other individual.

Have you read any of thread up to this point?

grimupnorthnot · 19/11/2024 16:21

Scrowy · 19/11/2024 16:12

How will that work with reservation of benefit which will be the case for most farms handing it over before death.

Do YOU know anything about IHT and tax planning?

clearly like most of the farmers I know they retire off the farm and the next generation takes over and runs the farm.....

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-neidle-labour-put-up-the-wrong-taxes/id1703785141?i=1000677192596

Dan Neidle: Labour Put Up The Wrong Taxes

Dan Neidle: Labour Put Up The Wrong Taxes

Podcast Episode · The Rest Is Money · 17/11/2024 · 45m

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-neidle-labour-put-up-the-wrong-taxes/id1703785141?i=1000677192596

grimupnorthnot · 19/11/2024 16:22

ImNunTheWiser · 19/11/2024 16:20

Have you read any of thread up to this point?

of course not

Suntree32 · 19/11/2024 16:23

@scrowy, what does 'small tax dodge farms' mean? All the tax dodging is being done by big businesses/ very wealthy people buying up very large parts of the countryside.

potatocakesinprogress · 19/11/2024 16:26

Papyrophile · 19/11/2024 14:14

@potatocakesinprogress your hope that closing the loophole might bring the price of agricultural land back to realistic levels per acre is the only silver lining I can see.

There are definitiely wealthy people using farmland to shelter wealth from IHT. I even know a few. I don't have a problem with their heirs taking a haircut.

The small dairy farmer across the valley from my office is not part of the hunting, shooting, fishing brigade.

I imagine Jeremy Clarkson is one of the dodgers. He seems the type.

Suntree32 · 19/11/2024 16:26

For most farming isn't just job you retire from. Most just carry on till their health means that they can't do it anymore. It's everything to them. The land, their land, which had often been in their family for generations, means everything, it's kind of ingrained.

Collaborate · 19/11/2024 16:28

Scrowy · 19/11/2024 15:51

Well, hang on.

Most 'owned' farms have massive mortgages on them going back generations. It's often no different to paying rent it's just the landlord is the bank

In that case the net value of the estate is even less. IHT is paid on the net value of the estate. Not sure how this changes the point I made, which is that if someone inherits a 300 acre farm they won’t have to pay the rent you’re paying. And have you ever stopped to think why you can’t afford to buy? Might it have something to do with millionaires and billionaires buying up farmland to avoid IHT and driving up the prices?

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 17:12

potatocakesinprogress · 19/11/2024 16:26

I imagine Jeremy Clarkson is one of the dodgers. He seems the type.

Of course he is!

OP posts:
Crikeyalmighty · 19/11/2024 17:22

Ok - if we take Clarkson as an example- I doubt his kids will want to continue farming- so it's likely it would be sold off- in that case - inheritance tax should be paid and in full. Why should it not be applicable ? and yet is applicable to jim smith whose family say sell off his hotel ( as an example) and not at a beneficial rate that farmers get.

My own personal view is that if the family continue to own and farm then really it makes more sense to split the ownership up at some point in your 60s - I realise as others have said 'that isn't done' - well traditions sometimes need to be looked at if they are illogical . Another option would be farmers who continue to farm ( not just buy to land hoard) pay an annual land tax based on acreage , rather than any IHT -

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 17:35

Crikeyalmighty · 19/11/2024 17:22

Ok - if we take Clarkson as an example- I doubt his kids will want to continue farming- so it's likely it would be sold off- in that case - inheritance tax should be paid and in full. Why should it not be applicable ? and yet is applicable to jim smith whose family say sell off his hotel ( as an example) and not at a beneficial rate that farmers get.

My own personal view is that if the family continue to own and farm then really it makes more sense to split the ownership up at some point in your 60s - I realise as others have said 'that isn't done' - well traditions sometimes need to be looked at if they are illogical . Another option would be farmers who continue to farm ( not just buy to land hoard) pay an annual land tax based on acreage , rather than any IHT -

Yes or a taper relief so that if it continues as a farm IHT is reduced. What I take issue with is the farmers selling farmland in droves for housing - it doesn’t seem justified that they avoid IHT on the basis it’s a farm to then get a massive windfall from a commercial sale.

OP posts:
ClaudiaWankleman · 19/11/2024 18:57

StandingSideBySide · 19/11/2024 14:11

If farmers were given 7 years to prepare like everyone else it wouldn’t be so bad.
As it is the Treasury have even refused a compromise re 80plus year olds. They still think that’s fare.
No it isn’t.

Labour should be considering other ways of making and saving money

Why not save £101,712,000 / year by not giving prisoners tuck money for example.

The number of farmers who will lose out is minuscule. The number of millionaires who will now pay more tax is higher.

Radged · 19/11/2024 19:00

So OP starts a thread pleading ignorance to bait arguments knowing funn well what its all about. Isnt that a bit frowned upon?

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 19:16

Radged · 19/11/2024 19:00

So OP starts a thread pleading ignorance to bait arguments knowing funn well what its all about. Isnt that a bit frowned upon?

What’s led you to that conclusion?

OP posts:
Chocolateteabag · 19/11/2024 19:22

1dayatatime · 19/11/2024 12:50

All it will mean is that more farmers are forced to sell their farms to investment firms (like in the US).

In the long term this will create a shift from farmers owning and running their own farms to tenant farmers running farms on a contract for investment firms.

Not owning the farm reduces the incentive to put in long term measures (tree planting, hedge repairs, drainage, new tractor etc etc) that will only see a return in the very long run. Instead tenant farmers will be incentivised to focus on generating the maximum money during the period of their tenancy (which still won't be that much) at the long term cost of the stewardship of the land.

If you live in a city then I can fully understand that tax revenues trump consideration of land stewardship but it's a very short sighted approach.

Bumping this as it's so true

We are blindly stumbling in to handing over our countryside to massive conglomerate farms and overseas investors who will not have UK food security as a priority
Short term profits over long term planning
Good arable land turned into carbon capture fields

But hey - we can just import our food - who needs farmers anyway

SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 19:32

Well that’s a really interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing.

OP posts:
SunQueen24 · 19/11/2024 19:34

Chocolateteabag · 19/11/2024 19:22

Bumping this as it's so true

We are blindly stumbling in to handing over our countryside to massive conglomerate farms and overseas investors who will not have UK food security as a priority
Short term profits over long term planning
Good arable land turned into carbon capture fields

But hey - we can just import our food - who needs farmers anyway

Interestingly the article above states the exact opposite:-

Guy Singh-Watson,

“Don’t be fooled”, he writes, “those who are pushing the hardest against this change to inheritance tax… don’t represent farmers.”
“They represent the super-rich who don’t want to contribute their fair due, and are simply buying up our country to keep more money and assets for themselves.”

OP posts:
38thparallel · 19/11/2024 19:54

“Don’t be fooled”, he writes, “those who are pushing the hardest against this change to inheritance tax… don’t represent farmers.”

So the only people who are objecting to this tax are the super-rich?
Was everyone on the protest today super rich? Presumably so as according to Guy Singh-Watson ordinary farmers don’t care about it.