Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

How much would pay for Quality Street to be how it used to be?

13 replies

Healingsfall · 15/11/2024 19:48

I'd imagine a tin from the 80s would cost £20 - £30 in today's money, if they reverted the sweets back to how a tin was would you pay it?

I remember them being such a luxury, even the wrappers were luxury! Now they're just cheap, tacky, and taste awful 😔 I'd definitely pay a premium to have a luxury item at Christmas!

Is this a result of the consumer not willing to pay more despite the costs to make the product going up or is this the result of a company putting profits before product quality? (No pun intended 😆)

OP posts:
sprigatito · 15/11/2024 19:50

I'd pay £20 for a tin. I'd resent it, but I'd pay it and enjoy every mouthful (and save the lovely glinty wrappers)

NuffSaidSam · 15/11/2024 19:52

I probably wouldn't pay that much, but I would love to see/smell one of the old style tins with the proper wrappers and everything.

U13579 · 15/11/2024 19:53

I would hate for the wrappers to come back, so disappointed people really don't seem to care about positive environmental changes companies are making. It will be more expensive for the company too so isn't for their benefit it has been done for environmental benefits

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 15/11/2024 19:55

Less than I would pay for 80s Roses which were better and are shite now

MrsClatterbuck · 15/11/2024 19:55

When clearing out my mum's house I found 2 old tins one is really large. I used to use it for taking my ingredients to school for my domestic science class.

TheBigSalami · 15/11/2024 19:56

Nothing. I would never buy them. They seem a throwback to my childhood.

Healingsfall · 15/11/2024 19:57

I'd pay £20 for a tin if the chocolates were a real luxury. Maybe it is the consumers fault for wanting the same quality at the same price, even though the product is more expensive to make?

OP posts:
Tina159 · 15/11/2024 20:03

Well I'd pay the prices they're asking now - whereas I won't be buying the disgusting cheap chocolates in little tubs for £6 that they are currently.

Anonym00se · 15/11/2024 20:05

In the late 70s a tin of Quality Street weighed 5.5lbs (2.5Kg) and cost £4.99 which is about £26 in today’s money.

Today a 600g tub is around £6, so it’s roughly 1/4 of the size and 1/4 of the cost. But generally a similar overall price, which is surprising.

MiscellaneousSupportHuman · 15/11/2024 20:15

I'm OK with the new wrappers. But would like to see all the old chocs back (even the cracknell) plus of course all the caramel ones that seems to have vanished

Healingsfall · 15/11/2024 20:20

Anonym00se · 15/11/2024 20:05

In the late 70s a tin of Quality Street weighed 5.5lbs (2.5Kg) and cost £4.99 which is about £26 in today’s money.

Today a 600g tub is around £6, so it’s roughly 1/4 of the size and 1/4 of the cost. But generally a similar overall price, which is surprising.

That's interesting. Maybe they should have kept the chocs the same but do it as a pic n mix like you get in John Lewis so the customer can pay as little or as much as they like.

OP posts:
Speedweed · 15/11/2024 20:20

I'd pay £26 and more for the lovely big metal tin, actual chocolate so that when you opened the lid you got that distinctive lovely festive smell of chocolate, foil and cellophane, the old selection and the old style wrappers. Such a glorious memory.

I don't bother buying them now, it's too disappointing.

SprinklesSparkles · 15/11/2024 20:38

about £20, i don’t buy them now as hate the wrappers

New posts on this thread. Refresh page