I'm somewhat surprised this didn't get more discussion.
But then when you read the Guardian summary:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/15/roblox-allegations-ofcom-online-safety-act
Hindenburg Research claimed Roblox’s games exposed children to grooming, pornography, violent content and abusive speech. The company, which has stated that it is seeking to profit from a fall in Roblox’s share price by taking out a so-called “short” position on the company’s stock, added it had found multiple accounts named using variations of Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and child sexual abuser, and had been able to set up an account under the name of a notorious American paedophile.
*
Roblox content is not authored by its developers, but instead by players. It provides the tools for children and teens to create their own simple gaming scenarios, and then play through them with friends. One popular Roblox “experience” has players working in a pizza parlour, and another involves a game of cops and robbers.
- The article minimises the report by focusing on the short position.
- It choses the Epstein username information to highlight, something that is easy to dismiss as, oh well just kids being edgy.
- It focuses on 'children and teens' making innocent little games, but fails to acknowledge that of course, adults can make them too.
Why do you think the Guardian journalists (Dan Milmo and Keza Macdonald) didn't quote the part of the report about the paedophiles trading CSA images?
- We tracked some of the members of “Adult Studios” and easily found 38 Roblox groups – one with 103,000 members – openly soliciting sexual favors and trading child pornography.
-
The chatrooms trading in child pornography had no age restrictions. Roblox reports that 21% of its users are under the age of 9, a number that is likely underestimated given that Roblox has no age verification aside
- Since September 2nd, 2024, third-party monitor ‘Moderation For Dummies’ has reported ~12,400 erotic roleplay accounts on Roblox. These include everything from “rape/forceful sex fetishes” to underage users “willing to do anything for Robux”.
Something tells me the Guardian journalists didn't even read to the end of the report:
[15] Disk (“💿”) and ghost (“👻”) emojis on the Roblox platform appear to signify Discord and Snapchat, respectively. It is a primary way that Roblox users posting illicit content get other users to add them off the Roblox platform. The illicit content can then be shared elsewhere while users pay Robux on-platform.
[16] It should be noted that Roblox has actively taken steps to silence critics who point out safety deficiencies, like Ruben Sim. Sim runs a YouTube channel that has chronicled horrific content on Roblox for almost a . In one case, Sim found and shared allegations that one of Roblox’s professional developers may be a pedophile. The exposing the possible pedophile garnered 1.4 million views. In others, Sim flagged suspected child exploitation content on Roblox. Instead of thanking Sim for help protecting vulnerable children on Roblox’s platform, in 2021, Roblox sued Sim for $1.6 million, alleging he incited a ‘cyber mob’ and off-platform threats. []
And of course, the final word goes to the Roblox company spokesperson.