Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What happens when the baby boomers die?

692 replies

LargeSquareRock · 08/09/2024 09:57

Sorry about the title, but that’s literally it. I’ve wondered this since I was a child.

Obviously we are about to enter a 20 year spike when a smaller number of tax payers support a higher number of elderly people in healthcare and elder care.

What happens in 20 years when the spike is over? Do we have empty care homes, plentiful housing and easily available health care?

I really have no evil agenda asking this- demographics has always fascinated me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
ALovelyCupOfNameChange · 14/03/2025 12:15

Let’s also not forget cash in hand jobs were everywhere
needed some cash, look after your neighbours kids, you’d get an evening job in a pub or cleaning. They don’t really exist anymore.

anyolddinosaur · 14/03/2025 12:48

@Shakenandstirredup It's from the same HMRC study that sky news quoted. It was in my history yesterday but I delete that often, you'll have to find it yourself.

Badbadbunny · 14/03/2025 13:09

chaosmaker · 14/03/2025 11:00

Boomers were also the post war generation. Far more jobs, less people and the luxury of being able to leave a job in the morning and get a new one in the afternoon. I don't like the work for work's sake rubbish. Being in a job just to earn money is NOT good for you and you should actually gain something for yourself out of it that isn't monetary.

Interesting in the light of NHSE being dismantled for providing jobs that aren't needed as they are duplicated elsewhere. Where are they going to put all those people? Reminds me of the 80's teenage dig a hole in the road and fill it in again YTS'.

It really shouldn't be "optional" as to whether you work or not unless you're seriously disabled or too young/too old or can genuinely provide for yourself. If you don't like your job, you apply for others and put up with it in the meantime. Living on benefits whether for a week, a month, a year or a decade shouldn't be a lifestyle choice if you're able to work.

As for the "dig a hole" thing, isn't that exactly what successive governments have done by expanding the public sector with so much duplication, so many "none" jobs, etc. There was a time before NHS England when the NHS seemed to function better. There was a time before all the NHS Trusts were created where the NHS seemed to function better. We really shouldn't be creating "paper shuffling" nor "manager arranging endless meetings" types of jobs in the public sector just for the sake of giving people jobs. It's really no different to the dig a hole type of madness.

As for "get a new job in the afternoon", did that time ever exist? Try telling that to miners, shipbuilders, car factory workers, and in fact basically all "manual" productive workers (mills, factories, etc) in the 70s and 80s when the vast majority of our manufacturing base collapsed and entire villages, towns and cities were plunged into massive levels of unemployment. Good luck if you were a miner in a mining village in the 70s or 80s to try to find another job the day after your mine closed down! Decades later, such places still have massive unemployment and social problems!

WearyAuldWumman · 14/03/2025 13:15

@Badbadbunny

I graduated in '83, at the same point that Dad was coming up for retirement. I recall trying to get onto management training programmes for various retail outlets who wanted graduates, only to be told that I was overqualified: they only wanted people with ordinary degrees.

I went to my local Job Centre to seek help (a coalmining area) and the pinstripe suited manager asked in his plummiest voice "Doo yooou have any qualifications?"

"Yes..."

"What dooo yoooou have?"

"An honours degree in..."

"Jesus Christ, hen! We cannae dae onything fur you!"

I was fortunate. I managed to get onto a PGCE course at the last minute and my Local Authority had an opening for me. (In those days, you were given preference in your home region.)

Papyrophile · 14/03/2025 13:40

For @Shakenandstirredup

Seymour5 · 14/03/2025 13:45

Shakenandstirredup · 14/03/2025 11:01

I've always read that boomers have got more out of the system the they put in which makes sense.

Take the state pension for example which is 11k ish a year. So 20 years of that is 222k. Which means you would have to have earned 52k or the equivalent for 20 years to have paid enough tax & NI. But we know that only 3.5% paid 40% tax rate In 1991–92. And that's before you factor in healthcare, education, police etc.

Now obviously there isn't a pot and the money is paid forward but with the changing demographics it's becoming a real
issue. We already have more over 65s than under 15s.

The state pension for those retiring prior to 2016 isn’t £11k. It’s £169.50 a week, or just under £9k. Younger pensioners £221 a week. Around £50 a week more.

As an older pensioner I seem to have to point this out every time state pensions get a mention.

www.gov.uk/browse/working/state-pension

Rosscameasdoody · 14/03/2025 13:48

Seymour5 · 14/03/2025 13:45

The state pension for those retiring prior to 2016 isn’t £11k. It’s £169.50 a week, or just under £9k. Younger pensioners £221 a week. Around £50 a week more.

As an older pensioner I seem to have to point this out every time state pensions get a mention.

www.gov.uk/browse/working/state-pension

That poster also appears not to know that policing comes out of council tax.

MrsPeregrine · 14/03/2025 13:48

chaosmaker · 14/03/2025 12:02

ChatGP is a writing ai thing, isn't it? not a source of knowledge......

It isn’t actually. You should try using it and then maybe you will find out…

Rosscameasdoody · 14/03/2025 13:51

ALovelyCupOfNameChange · 13/03/2025 20:06

It’s going to be housing benefit because of the lack of council houses and private rental costs.

It will also be UC because supplementary benefit and income support were far less generous as income top ups for the low paid than UC.

Rosscameasdoody · 14/03/2025 13:55

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 13/09/2024 15:51

I was born in the early 1960s and when I was growing up I had the impression that it was fairly normal for women to stay on at work after marriage but leave towards the end of the first pregnancy. I remember a teacher at my school leaving because she was getting married and we all thought it was rather odd, although I have a hazy memory that she was moving away too, possibly because of her new husband's job. That would have been the mid 1970s. Not long after that the first teacher took maternity leave after it became a statutory entitlement. It felt quite revolutionary when she returned a few months later.

I know there were some big changes in employers' policies around forcing women to leave on marriage from the mid 1950s on, but were these as a result of changes in the law or was it a social change that employers either did or didn't adopt? I imagine the change in the civil service must have come from government. My MIL was forced to leave her job at the Post Office Savings Bank, then an outpost of government, when she married in the early 1950s. She got another office job in the City until my husband was born and much later went back to the Civil Service as part of a concerted drive to get former women employees back by offering part-time work.

I also imagine that women from strong union backgrounds were far more likely to fight against antediluvian atittudes to women working after marriage. I expect it varied a lot by industry, whether the woman lived in a big city noted for Radical or left-wing politics or in a sleepy backwater, and so on.

That would have been the mid 1970s. Not long after that the first teacher took maternity leave after it became a statutory entitlement. It felt quite revolutionary when she returned a few months later.

There was no statutory entitlement to maternity pay until 1987.

TheCompactPussycat · 14/03/2025 13:58

MrsPeregrine · 14/03/2025 13:48

It isn’t actually. You should try using it and then maybe you will find out…

Although it is certainly not a source of "knowledge" anyone should consider accurate without thoroughly checking its results against established reliable sources.

Rosscameasdoody · 14/03/2025 14:01

Iwasafool · 12/09/2024 19:49

My grandmother married in 1921, my grandfather worked in a government job and told her she had to give up work as in his job wives weren't allowed to work, so she did. The Monday after their wedding he went back to work, as he was eating his breakfast he told her she could have anything she wanted, she just had to ask. He came home and while eating his dinner she told him she didn't have to ask for anything as she'd been to see her old boss and had her job back.

The marriage bar started to be lifted in the 1940s and for local government ended in 1954. Did she have to resign or did she just expect to give up work. When you think about it how would her employers know she was married unless she told them?

Well she would have to have told them wouldn’t she ? Otherwise how would they have been able to pay her tax and NI?

Rosscameasdoody · 14/03/2025 14:06

Judetiff · 10/09/2024 18:07

What article? Where is the article? Is it a left wing publication supporting Labour’s actions?

And does it include putting back into the system every asset they own to pay for elderly care when they need it ?

pursuitOfSomething · 14/03/2025 14:11

I read they'd be a slow % decrease in housing costs year on year as deamnd fell - but that was before they were predicting another 5-10 million in population from immigration in next decade.

It's not a one shot issue - every generation got smaller - plus as parental age has got older the gap between generations has increased as well. Plus as PP have said next geneation poor pensions and fewer home owners. It's also happen world wide at a more rapid pace - so how that affetc immigration levels - and geopoltical poltics will also factor in.

We had kids slightly later - but still relatively young - plus given house prices and rent kids more likley to boomerag back - so we'll have fewer children free years to build savings - though same time expect to work much longer. Whether unlike parent generation employers will have caught up with that - or if we too will be facing career changes post reducancy in mid 50s as our parents did.

Over 20 years though hard to predict.

Birth rates seem on a decline so schools and child/maternity service will decline and may have to travel further to access - hard to say what immigration will be as that depends on world factors and government polices. Tax system depends on government policy - which partly depends on world factors and partly on what electroate will tolerate - that will impact a lot including birth rates.

pursuitOfSomething · 14/03/2025 14:16

I'm not sure if NHS will still be a thing or if we'll shift to some insurance and safety net thing like Europe/most of the world.

I've started to see articles and public musings about making state pension means tested - no idea if that will happen.

No idea what industry/services the UK will have - two areas we grew up in had differenet manufactoring bases and one of our parents worked for biggest local employer - and not even by end of their working lives that was all gone.

Onemorenamechangeagain · 26/03/2025 17:40

Badbadbunny · 14/03/2025 10:57

When I was at school, my school friends were "claiming" to leave school at the end of term in fifth year, somehow managed to get themselves a council funded flat for the Summer, and then they started college or sixth form in September (which was always the plan) and had to vacate their council funded flat because they were back in education. So, there WERE benefits and abuses of benefits back then. I knew several of my school friends who did it. In fact my first boyfriend did it, and we "enjoyed" a Summer in his flat until he had to vacate it and go back home to live with his parents! Funny how he engineered a fake massive argument with his parents (or so he told the DHSS/Council) to get the flat as he couldn't possibly continue living at home, but then funnily enough as soon as he lost his eligibility for his flat (started college), the fake massive argument was completely forgotten and he moved back in with the parents, happy ever after. It was the same then as it is now, people know how to play the system, people talk, and soon the abuse becomes widespread.

I vaguely remember a couple of girls in school who would get pregnant towards the end of year 11, spend a few months in a mother and baby hostel and soon enough they'd get a council flat. As soon as they'd secured the council flat they'd them sign over guardianship rights to their parents (baby's grandparents) because they "couldn't cope". Then they'd have a 2 bedroom flat all to themselves. No bedroom tax in those days either.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page