Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Winter fuel payments for pensioners scrapped

1000 replies

MidnightPatrol · 29/07/2024 16:05

Unless they are in receipt of pension credit or other benefits.

I suspect this will be the first of many benefits which will be restricted as part of cost-cutting measures.

What else might we see / should we see?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
IWanderedLonely · 29/07/2024 21:01

Well it's Labour, what did you expect? Hmm Stuff anyone who's worked hard in low paying jobs all their lives and scrimped and saved, but if you're a lifelong benefits scrounger, you're made.

Xyz1234567 · 29/07/2024 21:01

S0livagant · 29/07/2024 20:52

'Charity is a cold grey loveless thing. If a rich man wants to help the poor, he should pay his taxes gladly, not dole out money at a whim.' - Clement Attlee

My father has paid all his taxes, employed many people in highly paid careers and gives to charity They're not mutually exclusive.

PuddlesPityParty · 29/07/2024 21:02

MeouwCat · 29/07/2024 20:44

We paid in with our time and our labour.

Did you even read what the poster put? Embarrassing.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Christine1998 · 29/07/2024 21:02

My elderly mum now won’t get it. She is just over the pension credit limit due to her state pension and a widows pension from my dad’s company pension. She is by no means rolling in it. She has dementia, Alzheimer’s and bowel cancer and needs to be warm and comfortable in her home. Now she won’t get this, it’s her something else for her to have to fund. They worked hard to own their home. If it comes to it and she needs care we will have to sell the family home which is another issue. It’s really not fair for the people in the middle. It really boils my piss that it’s the elderly that suffer yet younger people that don’t work and probably never have qualify for loads and sit at home all day with loads of kids and get as much in benefits if not probably more than working families Yes I’m stereotyping but My parents worked all their life yet get no help. As usual it’s people that shouldn’t that suffer.

Papyrophile · 29/07/2024 21:02

So much of our economic woes is because of the distorted housing market which has lead to huge inter generational inequality.

At which point it seems appropriate to point out that the vast wealth achieved by the boomer generation is gradually going to be inherited by their children. Surely this is the moment to stfu and wait for the pay day?

upinaballoon · 29/07/2024 21:02

Off the top of my head, I think Labour (Gordon Brown?) introduced WFP because they'd once given pensioners 75p extra on their pensions and got a bit of flak. WFP increased under Labour. Tories/ Lib Dems came in, reduced WFP but continued to pay it as a universal benefit. Helen Mirren said she didn't need hers. Labour now in, zapping it completely from many, some of whom won't be so wonderfully well off. I'll go google. I wonder if Newsnight will interview Gordon Brown.

VJBR · 29/07/2024 21:02

All these labour supporters who’s parent were on cruises when they received their winter fuel allowance. Hard to believe.

Rosscameasdoody · 29/07/2024 21:02

Windymoore · 29/07/2024 20:57

I meant out of today's announcements: and I wouldn't disagree with the thrust of your point as I can see any one or two of those happening

Yes, sorry, I see what you meant.

Elphame · 29/07/2024 21:02

Miley1967 · 29/07/2024 20:55

I work with the elderly helping them to claim what they are eligible for. many don't want to claim means tested benefits because of the scrutiny of it. I had one client this week who is missing out on £40 of housing benefit because she wasn't willing to submit three months worth of bank statements to the council so they chose just to not claim. It happens again and again. They also don't want the hassle of constantly updating various benefit departments when savings rise and fall. I see a lot of elderly people in a real mess with benefits, bury their heads in the sand about things, don't want others to know what savings they have etc.

Edited

That is very much my experience, too.

SaxaSoLow · 29/07/2024 21:03

MrsSunshine2b · 29/07/2024 17:51

Everyone knows you need to save for retirement and have a good pension pot. Now employers auto-enrol you, there's not really much of an excuse to be relying on the basic state pension. Pensioners don't need as much money as younger people though. They've hopefully paid off their mortgage, their children are financially independent, they don't need to put money aside for their old age because they're already in it.

i don’t necessarily think this was ever a good benefit but I do have to pass comment on a post like this. The quote ‘the past is a foreign country, they do things differently there’ was never truer. It matters not that there is NOW auto enrolment and employer obligations, it’s what the situation was like decades back that is relevant. You may find this hard to believe but in the late
50s, early 60’S my father served for 11 years in the military. His pension? Nothing. There was no pension. Yes. That’s correct. That plus how serving abroad made him ineligible for housing too when he quit. Women working part time? Often ineligible too. So don’t take 2024 norms and apply them to people who are now retired.

StringMittens · 29/07/2024 21:04

AnnaMagnani · 29/07/2024 16:21

I think that is fair. Neither my DM or MIL actually need them and there must be a lot of pensioners in the same position.

Yes and there must be a lot of pensioners who do. I would rather some who don't need it get it than those who genuinely need it don't get it.

MeouwCat · 29/07/2024 21:05

Windymoore · 29/07/2024 20:57

I meant out of today's announcements: and I wouldn't disagree with the thrust of your point as I can see any one or two of those happening

I am emailing my (brand new) Labour MP to let her know how I feel about this. I vpted Labour, I feel cheated.

JoyousPinkPeer · 29/07/2024 21:05

SonicTheHodgeheg · 29/07/2024 16:18

I think that this one is fair enough. Lots of posts on here over the years where people have said that there ILs didn’t need the money but still received it.

Yes, just give the non-workers, benefit scroungers more and the elderly, who have paid massive taxes all their lives and had bugger all back ... nothing whatsoever! And so say all of us (Not)!!

Hangingupnow · 29/07/2024 21:06

Well it's Labour, what did you expect? Stuff anyone who's worked hard in low paying jobs all their lives and scrimped and saved, but if you're a lifelong benefits scrounger, you're made.

I just dint understand this attitude. I don’t begrudge people in social housing or who get UC or pension credit. And the fact some people get benefits doesn’t deter me from working or saving.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 29/07/2024 21:07

Whatabonkersworld · 29/07/2024 20:11

Hasn't she already pointed her laser guidance at private pension schemes suggesting the £800m safely and sensibly invested to provide an income to pensioners be utilised to 'kickstart' growth by investing in the many dodgy building projects the govt want to get going? So wouldn't you believe t? another raid on pensioners incomes coz I can't see the govt guaranteeing the investment.

Indeed…just as private sector pensions had started to recover from the Blair/Brown sabotage. We are truly on a road to a two tier system under this government…who would have thought that it would a Labour government that made the gap between the poor and better off bigger. And they’re only a quarter of the way through their first 100 days. Still, the rebuild trust and public service mantra have gone out of the window as quickly!

Rosscameasdoody · 29/07/2024 21:07

Burnbaby · 29/07/2024 20:57

There is no cap on Child Benefit!!!! The cap is on tax credits and UC element!

Martin Lewis tweeted about again last week complaining about the wording of Child Benefit by the press

Yes, sorry - and apologies to the original poster. Got my facts the wrong way around !!

Hangingupnow · 29/07/2024 21:08

It really boils my piss that it’s the elderly that suffer yet younger people that don’t work and probably never have qualify for loads and sit at home all day with loads of kids and get as much in benefits if not probably more than working families Yes I’m stereotyping but My parents worked all their life yet get no help. As usual it’s people that shouldn’t that suffer.

Have you seen the birth rates? There really aren’t many people doing nothing popping out dc. Most people who receive benefits are working.

upinaballoon · 29/07/2024 21:09

StringMittens · 29/07/2024 21:04

Yes and there must be a lot of pensioners who do. I would rather some who don't need it get it than those who genuinely need it don't get it.

Edited

I think the late Frank Field was ok with a universal benefit, on those grounds. If he wasn't, I apologise.

PuddlesPityParty · 29/07/2024 21:09

MeouwCat · 29/07/2024 21:05

I am emailing my (brand new) Labour MP to let her know how I feel about this. I vpted Labour, I feel cheated.

Why do you feel cheated?

ObsidianTree · 29/07/2024 21:10

I think it's fair. My parents are a lot better off as pensioners than families with children. They really dont need that money. It should always have been for poorer pensioners only really.

Seems silly that pensioners with mortgages paid off and private and state pensions were getting this when single parents/low earning families can't afford to put heating on etc.

S0livagant · 29/07/2024 21:12

Xyz1234567 · 29/07/2024 21:01

My father has paid all his taxes, employed many people in highly paid careers and gives to charity They're not mutually exclusive.

I didn't mean that he didn't. You could see the government stopping the payment to those who don't need it as a 'tax', as that money can then be used elsewhere. That's better imo than those people choosing to donate it to the worthy cause or deserving poor of their choice. I don't see the Salvation Army losing the payment being a problem. I want a society where charity is not necessary.

Windymoore · 29/07/2024 21:12

Papyrophile · 29/07/2024 20:52

On IHT, my opinion depends entirely on how the rules are changed and applied.

I know some very wealthy people who have ploughed money into agricultural property, buying any cheap farm that was for sale to place it outwith the IHT rules so their kids will get it intact, the whole kit and kaboodle.

The burden isn't going to hit them, but our single family home will get much harsher treatment. Our DC aren't going to suffer under the current rules, but it's the rewriting I fear.

I don't have a problem with DC paying tax at 40% over £1 million, because you are allowed to amass that in a pension fund, but to take a much higher % from the sensible savers is to deter the sensible savers coming behind them. Enough will think, the government will take it in tax so I may as well spend it and go on that cruise. And that will seriously impede the country's capacity for long term capital formation.

Quite. Also, why save when inflation is making your savings worth less? I know it's 2% at the moment,but I think that may be going north soon

Hangingupnow · 29/07/2024 21:12

At which point it seems appropriate to point out that the vast wealth achieved by the boomer generation is gradually going to be inherited by their children. Surely this is the moment to stfu and wait for the pay day?

@Papyrophile What a stupid comment.

Let’s just ignore that we have a distorted housing market, wage stagnation, ageing population, increased pressure on public services, etc. it’s all ok because some people will inherit loads. What about those that don’t inherit?

It’s far better for work to pay and allow some financial security rather than rely on an inheritance in your 50s/60s.

Hangingupnow · 29/07/2024 21:13

But presumably that’s why they will look at IHT.

Papyrophile · 29/07/2024 21:15

Yes, @ObsidianTree , but almost all of them paid off their own mortgages from their own money. It is ridiculous to expect them to pay again to subsidise younger generations when their pensions are below the NMW x 40 hours.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.