Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Identical twins DNA questions

12 replies

AllsAllie · 27/06/2024 21:16

Strange question but do identical twins have identical DNA? And in the case of females do their ovums (ova) have identical DNA? If they do, is your twin sister's offspring biologically kind of your offspring too as they'd share the same half genes.

This is the story that got me wondering.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13571805/identical-twin-surprises-woman-infertility-pregnancy-husband.html

OP posts:
AllsAllie · 27/06/2024 22:48

Bumping as curious about how it works. My op is probably horribly ignorant, please educate me.

OP posts:
Scarletttulips · 27/06/2024 22:56

I heard that story and it’s not the DNA that’s the issue here is it?

opalsandcoffee · 27/06/2024 22:56

yes, more or less

Neodymium · 27/06/2024 22:57

Yes if you did a dna test, then both twins should show up as being the parent of a baby. So they are kind of like your children. Children of identical twins who are cousins are also genetically half siblings. But there can be some minor differences in dna. Interesting though twins have different finger prints.

AllsAllie · 27/06/2024 23:03

That's really mind blowing to me, so interesting.

@Scarletttulips no it's not the issue in the article but it made me wonder.

OP posts:
MirrorMirror1247 · 27/06/2024 23:06

There's a theory that fingerprints come from the inside of the womb, when babies rub their fingers on it. I've no idea how true this is, though!

leeverarch · 27/06/2024 23:15

MirrorMirror1247 · 27/06/2024 23:06

There's a theory that fingerprints come from the inside of the womb, when babies rub their fingers on it. I've no idea how true this is, though!

Completely untrue!

MirrorMirror1247 · 27/06/2024 23:17

leeverarch · 27/06/2024 23:15

Completely untrue!

Fair enough! I heard it on a podcast, I forget which one, but I did think it was an interesting theory!

YouWillGetThere · 27/06/2024 23:28

Would it be okay if I attempt to explain it. Apologies if it makes no sense.

Here's the deal. Slightly simplifed:

Each human being has 46 chromosomes. That means 22 identical pairs. Then another pair which are the sex chromosomes - so either two X chromosomes for a woman, or an X and a Y for a man.

When I say 22 identical pairs, the pairs are actually not quite identical. For example each person would have two copies of chromosome 15, but they would not be completely identical copies. There would be some small differences, and mutations in the DNA in each copy of Chromosome 15.

You could say that each person has two slightly different copies of Chromosome 15 and if you were really pushing the boat out you could call them 15a and 15b.

You could go further and say that Mum has 15a:15b and Dad has 15c:5d

When a man and woman have a baby, the man contributes one copy from each of his pairs of chromosomes, and so does the woman.

So for example their DC1 might get:

Dad: chromosome 15d
Mum: chromosome 15b

but then DC2 might get:

Dad: Chromosome 15c
Mum: Chromosome 15a.

These two children would be biological siblings, but since they have no copies of chromosome 15 in common, they could be very very different people.

They could, by chance have the same thing happen with all the other chromosomes, and end up with no chromosomes in common at all.

Conversely, the siblings could all get the "a" chromosome from Mum and all the "c" chromosomes from Dad, and be born almost identical, inspite of not being twins.

Sorry this is getting terribly complicated but stick with me.

Coming to the twins who married the other twins,

Imagine that the Mum twins were a:c for all chromosomes.

and the Dad twins being from a totally different family were g:k for all chromosomes (very different from the Mum twins because they are from a totally different family., but identical to each other.)

When the Mum twins and the Dad twins produce babies, the babies could all be:

a : k for all chromosomes and so largely identical

But equally the babies of one couple ould be a : k while the the babies of the other couple could be c : g.

If this happened then the babies would be very very different from each other, but technically just as identical as siblings who also happen to
inherit a : k and c : g from their parents.

Sorry that turned out to be really complicated to explain. I hope it sort of made sense.

I'm an expert on fern sex, which is why I think a lot about this stuff.

DedicatedCakeEater · 27/06/2024 23:33

YouWillGetThere · 27/06/2024 23:28

Would it be okay if I attempt to explain it. Apologies if it makes no sense.

Here's the deal. Slightly simplifed:

Each human being has 46 chromosomes. That means 22 identical pairs. Then another pair which are the sex chromosomes - so either two X chromosomes for a woman, or an X and a Y for a man.

When I say 22 identical pairs, the pairs are actually not quite identical. For example each person would have two copies of chromosome 15, but they would not be completely identical copies. There would be some small differences, and mutations in the DNA in each copy of Chromosome 15.

You could say that each person has two slightly different copies of Chromosome 15 and if you were really pushing the boat out you could call them 15a and 15b.

You could go further and say that Mum has 15a:15b and Dad has 15c:5d

When a man and woman have a baby, the man contributes one copy from each of his pairs of chromosomes, and so does the woman.

So for example their DC1 might get:

Dad: chromosome 15d
Mum: chromosome 15b

but then DC2 might get:

Dad: Chromosome 15c
Mum: Chromosome 15a.

These two children would be biological siblings, but since they have no copies of chromosome 15 in common, they could be very very different people.

They could, by chance have the same thing happen with all the other chromosomes, and end up with no chromosomes in common at all.

Conversely, the siblings could all get the "a" chromosome from Mum and all the "c" chromosomes from Dad, and be born almost identical, inspite of not being twins.

Sorry this is getting terribly complicated but stick with me.

Coming to the twins who married the other twins,

Imagine that the Mum twins were a:c for all chromosomes.

and the Dad twins being from a totally different family were g:k for all chromosomes (very different from the Mum twins because they are from a totally different family., but identical to each other.)

When the Mum twins and the Dad twins produce babies, the babies could all be:

a : k for all chromosomes and so largely identical

But equally the babies of one couple ould be a : k while the the babies of the other couple could be c : g.

If this happened then the babies would be very very different from each other, but technically just as identical as siblings who also happen to
inherit a : k and c : g from their parents.

Sorry that turned out to be really complicated to explain. I hope it sort of made sense.

I'm an expert on fern sex, which is why I think a lot about this stuff.

Wait, what - fern sex? I'd love to know more.

Lorelaigilless · 27/06/2024 23:37

@YouWillGetThere what a clear and interesting explanation - thank you!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread