Milly Dowler was a child of 13, not an adult woman as you say (let's get the facts right). As I said, there is evidence to suggest Claudia Lawrence was abducted early morning, not mid-afternoon as you've said twice now.
The original post is about 2 things: safety in an area that is generally considered safe as it is leafy and nice (Ascot) and walking to work early hours of the morning and the safety in doing that.
It is not therefore that "odd" as you keep implying to recall to mind 2 examples where neither point has been safe - nice, leafy Walton-on-Thames in Milly's case and an early morning walk to work in Claudia's. I think it more odd not to remember incidents like these when doing a risk assessment on your safety, which is what the OP was doing with her post.
You're being ridiculous and antagonistic with your little barbs about me not walking mid-afternoon. How stupid. Of course I do. "Presumably, that's where the evidence points!" What a superior, nasty little thing to say - I don't have extreme anxiety that leaves me incapable to leave the house but what if I did? Your nasty remark plus the earlier one "You should look into that" wouldn't exactly be helpful or nice, would it? So why try and put me down?
I've explained twice now my thought process of why I thought of Milly and Claudia. Read Catnipandcupcakes' post on page 3 to aid your understanding. What we're both saying is no matter how nice an area, no matter what time of day women are never guaranteed to be safe and you should consider these things in doing a risk assessment.
Optimism shouldn't play a part in doing an assessment on your safety - more fool you if it does.
Now please stop picking at me. It shows you up as not being a very nice person.