The “Pro-Palestine” students on college campuses can swear up, down, and sideways that they are “anti-war” and “anti-genocide,” but when some of the most commonly heard chants at the encampments are “intifada, intifada,” “globalize the intifada,” “there is only one solution, intifada revolution,” and “from water to water, Palestine is Arab,” those are not anti-war, anti-genocide slogans; that’s incitement to violence. When we hear “Hamas, we love you and your rockets too!” or “we say justice, you say how? Burn Tel Aviv to the ground!” these are not peace protests. When Jewish students who don’t fall in line are assaulted, when death threats against Jews are everywhere, when support for the Islamic Republic and its murderous proxies is widespread…well, it doesn’t matter how you describe your protests. These are protests organised by groups with long-established ties to terror organisations and support for massacres of Israelis, including October 7. Like the isolationists of the 1930s and 1940s (those American student activists who argued against getting involved in Europe’s war, pre- Pearl Harbour), the current crop of protestors are packaging their support for genocidally antisemitic groups in “anti-war” language.
My take: You can claim to be “anti-imperialist” all you want, but when you are supporting the biggest imperialist force in the Middle East, the Islamic Republic of Iran, your words ring just as hollow as those of the students during the 1979 Iranian Revolution who helped Ayatollah Khomeini come to power. Those same students later came to deeply regret their actions (I can provide you with some insight on this example if you’re interested).
The students can claim these are “pro-peace” protests, but we see them assaulting Jewish students: with fists, with sticks, with tasers, with water bottles, and more. We see the militarism and radicalisation and though we hope it never reaches that point, the Red Guards (the student group mobilised by Mao Zedong in 1966) are a prime example of where this can lead.