Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Is this sentence correct?

34 replies

Thunderpunt · 17/04/2024 13:28

Dubai Airport said it was facing "very challenging conditions" on Wednesday. It advised passengers not to turn up as runways were inundated with water.

Just sitting in a restaurant waiting for some food to arrive and was reading the news headlines.

Does the second sentence in the passage above make sense?

OP posts:
fromaytobe · 17/04/2024 14:38

Bullshots · 17/04/2024 13:33

'With water' is redundant. The runways are inundated.

You can't just say 'inundated', you have to qualify it, otherwise people can only make a guess.

Having said that, I assume that most people reading the message would already be well aware of the problem.

cardibach · 17/04/2024 15:51

BoredZelda · 17/04/2024 13:56

No, it needs water. You can be inundated with other things.

One specific definition of inundate is to flood.

Yes. But not the only one. So it helps to clarify they aren’t shut because they are inundated with something else.

BoredZelda · 17/04/2024 16:02

Yes. But not the only one. So it helps to clarify they aren’t shut because they are inundated with something else.

Not how language works, but if you want to see it dumbed down, fair enough.

TheCatOnTheBedIsAllMineAllMine · 17/04/2024 16:02

It should say the runways are flooded x

cardibach · 17/04/2024 16:10

BoredZelda · 17/04/2024 16:02

Yes. But not the only one. So it helps to clarify they aren’t shut because they are inundated with something else.

Not how language works, but if you want to see it dumbed down, fair enough.

It’s exactly how language works. It’s not dumbing down to clarify. One meaning of inundated is flooded (with water) a further meaning is overwhelmed by something else - diverted planes or passengers for eg.
English teacher for 35 years here.

60andsomething · 17/04/2024 16:57

but you can also be flooded with other things beside water, so using the word flooded instead would not change anything

ThisIsTheGreatestShow · 17/04/2024 17:47

Like a previous poster indicated the Spanish, inondations is flooded in French

NeverEnoughPants · 17/04/2024 19:05

BoredZelda · 17/04/2024 16:02

Yes. But not the only one. So it helps to clarify they aren’t shut because they are inundated with something else.

Not how language works, but if you want to see it dumbed down, fair enough.

Of course it's how language works!

If it was clear from the context, the 'with water' wouldn't be needed. It wasn't clear, so in this specific instance, it was needed.

cardibach · 18/04/2024 11:18

ThisIsTheGreatestShow · 17/04/2024 17:47

Like a previous poster indicated the Spanish, inondations is flooded in French

Edited

Interesting etymological links, but not really relevant to clarity in English, where flooded means flooded and inundated has additional meanings…

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread