I never said the virus did not exist, or the jabs did not have benefits. (I think I may have caught the virus in 2019, before the government hit the panic button. So do many other people I have talked to.)
I do think restrictions were excessive, but I won’t go so far as to say they shouldn’t have happened at all. Even I would concede that. However, they went on far too long.
My main issue is the way everything was communicated, in a way, this was almost worse than the restrictions themselves. The infantilising language “don’t kill granny”, the three-word slogans, the gaslighting, the fear porn, moving the goalposts, deliberately pitting groups of people against each other, encouraging people to snitch on each other, lack of Parliamentary scrutiny, things being made up on the spot (eg one hour limit), implied permanence of restrictions with phrases such as “new normal”, labelling children as “vectors of transmission”, bullying, bribing and coercing people to be vaccinated, coming dangerously close to vaccine passports, deliberately confusing those who died “of covid” and “with covid”, cherry picking experts to be interviewed who would stick to the government script (it was obvious they were doing this), interrupting those who were in danger of letting something slip, actively censoring debate, and I haven’t even got on to Partygate there. Because of the highly oppressive nature of the methods the government used to talk to the public, all this made it look as if the government was “up to something”, and many people such as myself considered it vital to fight back.
If the government had treated the public as intelligent people who could make their own decisions, presented them with facts rather than fear porn, people such as myself might be respecting the government much more now. But that ship has long sailed.