Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Are kids really trained from preschool to pass exams at 11+ and ebteabce

38 replies

Purpledragonz · 12/03/2024 23:34

Just that really
A friend told me that
They said it might sound OTT but data shows it give kids a massive advantage in the future

I'm not familiar with the British educational system (went to French schools), but how accurate is that? Or is it nomsense?

OP posts:
Justpontificating · 13/03/2024 09:59

AnotherNewt · 13/03/2024 09:29

Pre-school, no

Not reception either.

But in private schools, there will be little tests in KS1 and a start to summer exams no later than year 3 (age 7-8)

It means that the DC get really used to sitting exams - they're nowhere near such a big deal if you do them often.

State schools, aside from SATS, are unlikely to have exams in primary (and may not have testing at all, other than spellings and times tables)

How much cramming/drilling depends very much on the school. It can be very bad in the state system, with a Yr6 taken over by SATS drills. It can be very light in the private sector, with a broad curriculum and only one revision week then the exams themselves.

Agree.
Ours always had end of year exams from prep onwards. That’s age 8/9.

The exams were in all subjects based on the curriculum throughout the year.
I did the same every year at my state comp from age 11. I was surprised to hear that my dh and friends at other schools didn’t do this and the first exams they sat were the Olevel mocks.

My kids didn’t do verbal and non verbal reasoning though or anything to do with the 11plus. It was just end of year exams.

Wingham · 13/03/2024 10:02

Lanawashington · 13/03/2024 09:54

Completely off topic but what's ebteabce?

Yes.
Thanks for asking
What is that ?!

3WildOnes · 13/03/2024 12:12

Wingham · 13/03/2024 10:02

Yes.
Thanks for asking
What is that ?!

I assumed a typo for entrance

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Loulo6098 · 13/03/2024 12:13

I live in an area with super selective grammars. This is a traditionally poor area, many 'working class' families and many immigrant families. Official, more intense, 11+ prep starts in Year 4, but many children are tutored in English and Maths from Year 2, be it at home, 121 sessions or group tutoring like Kumon.

Most secondary schools here have dire outcomes. For obvious reasons, the only decent school is harder to get into. People choose to optimise their school choices by prepping their child for the 11+, regardless of how innately intelligent the kid is.

Caravaggiouch · 13/03/2024 12:14

Not in the normal world. For people targeting the top private schools and most selective grammars, I’m sure it is but it sounds miserable. Frankly I’d be moving as soon as I was pregnant if I lived in a grammar area. Most of the country doesn’t have grammar schools and most children don’t go to private schools.

NewName24 · 13/03/2024 22:34

In the sense that a good pre-school will do early phonics, yes.

that's a subjective, personal opinion about pre-school education, which isn't shared by all people.

NewName24 · 13/03/2024 22:37

x2boys · 13/03/2024 08:47

Regardless of what you read on mumsnet most of the UK don't have Grammar school and haven't since the 1970,s so obviously not.

But there are some LAs, which are not 'grammar school areas' where 20% (?? 25% ??) go to grammar schools, but that do have a handful. By default, those grammars then become 'super selective' and therefore "training" dc to pass the selection exams does become much more of 'a thing'.
Then there are parts of the UK that do still have grammars.

NewName24 · 13/03/2024 22:39

ZippyGoose · 13/03/2024 09:01

But the question is are they ‘trained’. And I think the answer to that is in private schools, they are. At 3 they start a full reception curriculum so by the time they’re in regular reception they’re onto year 1 stuff and it just snowballs so they’re always ahead.

in theory! In practice of course some kids aren’t developmentally ready

Yes, this.

LostMySocks · 13/03/2024 22:45

We live in a grammar area. The 11+ in September of Y6 covers material not taught until later in Y6.
Most kids are tutoring but there is a lot of group tutoring as well as the odd one or two doing 4hours a week in Y4 plus homework.
For standard 11+ with a 'deemed selective ' pass mark then standard selection criteria (looked after, distance etc) then a bright kid could pass with just minimal tutoring or practice papers with family. However for the super selectives you have to come above other kids. Hence the crazy tutoring.

x2boys · 14/03/2024 10:34

NewName24 · 13/03/2024 22:37

But there are some LAs, which are not 'grammar school areas' where 20% (?? 25% ??) go to grammar schools, but that do have a handful. By default, those grammars then become 'super selective' and therefore "training" dc to pass the selection exams does become much more of 'a thing'.
Then there are parts of the UK that do still have grammars.

There is something like 163 grammar schools in England and 66 in Northern Ireland compared with 4000 secondary schools so again most kids don't go to Grammar schools ,and in most towns they haven't been around since the 1970,s
I'm 50 and remember doing the education reforms in history at My comprehensive

Yes I know a few places still have the Grammar system but it isn't the norm.

NewName24 · 14/03/2024 18:45

I agree @x2boys that most dc don't go to grammar schools.

However, if you are in one of the Counties that do have them, then that is 'most' in terms of the schools available to you.

Then if you live where I do, which is not a 'grammar school area' but which does have half a dozen grammar schools in the City, then the whole tutoring from infancy is rife, because there are over 10x the people who take the exams, than there are places. The fact that it is so difficult to get in, (because there aren't many places compared with the people who want a place) does create this frenzy amongst those that can both afford it, and are willing to put their dc through it.

I'm out of touch with the figures now but when I went in the 70s, apparently the grammars took the top 2% of 11 yr olds (if you define 'top' by 'highest scoring on the tests you had). That is clearly a very different prospect from an 11 yr old in Kent where it seems 25 - 26% of 11 yr olds go to grammar schools.

MiserableMarch · 14/03/2024 18:49

@heatherwithapee same, is got books and very loosely got dd to do some but nothing formal or forced.

We used u tube for non verbal reasoning.. She just got over the line but out of her friend ls she's scoring much higher and the head of year told us she is very high in her entire cohort year. At the moment she's looking at a 9s flush.

mitogoshi · 14/03/2024 19:21

@Purpledragonz

Most children don't take the 11+ so no that's not the case.

My dc were 16 when they took their first exams. GCSEs

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread