My payment included both the life assurance element and the investment element, as was the case for others I knew at the time.
I was more than happy with my Endowment Mortgage. Makes a lot of sense if you understand it and work with it.
For me, I would never have taken out a mortgage without understanding what it was I was signing up to. I used to read the 'Money Supplements' in the 'heavy' Sunday papers. I got mortgage advice from more than one provider - including people who weren't trying to sell me their product.
I understood the "anticipated" return at the end of the policy was a figure worked out on the interest rates at the time, so clearly, when the interest rates I was paying on the mortgage started dropping, then obviously the interest rates on the investment side would be dropping too. So used the money 'saved' by no longer paying 15% interest on the mortgage, to start paying down the amount owed. SO, ultimately, when the endowment policy matured at a lower than predicted amount, it wasn't an issue, as the amount owed on the mortgage was much less too. That's how they worked.
The issue was, too many people signed up either without understanding that, or conveniently 'forgot' that. When interest rates started coming down, we had to do something to compensate for the fact interest rates on both investments and lending will go up or down together. You can't "gain" by no longer having to pay so much interest on the loan part, and expect the investment part to continue at the high rates that were there at the start.